Re: 2.2: can't see source preview

On 04/15/2016 06:58 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 04/14/2016 09:16 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >>> Guillaume Munch wrote: >>> >>>> Le 14/04/2016 13:59, Neal Becker a écrit : >>>>> Problem is, I use black text on white

Re: 2.2: can't see source preview

On 04/14/2016 09:16 AM, Neal Becker wrote: Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 14/04/2016 13:59, Neal Becker a écrit : Problem is, I use black text on white background. The source preview is unreadable because it's dark text with a black background. I went to preferences/colors and tried changing

Re: 2.2.0rc1 tar balls are available

On 04/13/2016 05:45 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 13/04/2016 11:23, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: It compiles fine on gentoo x86. BTW why is tarball 2x bigger than for 2.1? Pavel >>> >>> Why 2X bigger? I see a change from 20.8 to 32 from LyX 2.1.4 to >>>

Re: master is locked for 2.2.0rc1 preparation

On 04/13/2016 05:20 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> B) Branch 2.2.x from master and continue "unstable" development on master. >> >> To me it does not feel right that the commits in-between 2.2.0rc1 and 2.2.0 >> final would not *necessarily* be in master's commit history. > I

Re: master is locked for 2.2.0rc1 preparation

On 04/12/2016 03:33 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:23:07PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: On 04/12/2016 03:09 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 12/04/16 20:19, Pavel Sanda a �crit : Scott Kostyshak wrote: It is your call, anyway. It or something similar seems like a good

Re: master is locked for 2.2.0rc1 preparation

On 04/12/2016 03:09 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 12/04/16 20:19, Pavel Sanda a �crit : Scott Kostyshak wrote: It is your call, anyway. It or something similar seems like a good idea to me. I just want to make sure I understand the details. One detail you should also understand is

Re: master is locked for 2.2.0rc1 preparation

On 04/12/2016 04:42 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 12/04/2016 04:09, Richard Heck a écrit : >> I propose to create a 2.3.staging branch so development can proceed. We >> did this with this 2.1 cycle. Alternatively, we could create a >> 2.2.0.fixes branch, from which

Re: master is locked for 2.2.0rc1 preparation

On 04/11/2016 10:19 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:09:32PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 04/11/2016 09:49 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 07:05:55PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>>> Dear all, >>>> >&

Re: master is locked for 2.2.0rc1 preparation

On 04/11/2016 09:49 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 07:05:55PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> Please do not commit to master. I am doing some final compilation tests >> and checks and will soon tag and tar 2.2.0rc1. > Compilation tests and other checks went

Re: Regression in saving of flex insets in beta2?

On 04/11/2016 02:25 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 11/04/2016 19:02, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 04/11/2016 12:57 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: >>> Le 11/04/2016 17:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >>>> Le 11/04/2016 17:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>

Re: Regression in saving of flex insets in beta2?

On 04/11/2016 12:57 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 11/04/2016 17:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> Le 11/04/2016 17:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>> I can confirm that I do not see the problem in 2.1.4 and I do see it >>> with 2.2.0dev. >>> >>> I suppose this is a dataloss bug, and that

Re: Regression in saving of flex insets in beta2?

On 04/11/2016 12:28 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 11/04/2016 17:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> I can confirm that I do not see the problem in 2.1.4 and I do see it >> with 2.2.0dev. >> >> I suppose this is a dataloss bug, and that there is a rule of not going >> to an RC with a known

Re: Layout Files for Incompatible Class Files

On 04/10/2016 03:53 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 09:16:32PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> I believe, >> >> * there is no point in providing a new layout for an obsoleted class file, > +1 Just to be clear: There's no point providing a NEW layout for an obsolete class

Re: Misnumbering of subsections across chapter boundary

Thanks On 04/09/2016 06:05 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > On 10/04/2016 9:12 a.m., Richard Heck wrote: >> On 04/09/2016 05:02 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: >>> The attached png and (not quite) MWE lyx document show a subsection >>> inheriting its numbering

Re: Misnumbering of subsections across chapter boundary

On 04/09/2016 05:02 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > The attached png and (not quite) MWE lyx document show a subsection > inheriting its numbering across a chapter boundary, rather than > starting anew. This is with a recent reinstall of beta2, standard book > class, with none of my preferences etc.,

Re: [PATCH] Re: po-files with trailing

On 04/09/2016 11:36 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 07.04.2016 um 23:37 schrieb Richard Heck: > >> Then maybe the solution is to disable the writing of native line >> endings. Apparently, we can do this by opening the output files in >> binary mode. The attached patch doe

Re: Layout Files for Incompatible Class Files

On 04/08/2016 12:01 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 11:39:55AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 08:19:59AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: On 2016-04-07, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Still, the noncontroversial

[PATCH] Re: po-files with trailing

On 04/07/2016 05:21 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: >> I think the problem may not be that gettext works differently but, >> perhaps, that it works the same. I am guessing that what happens is this. >> First, lyx_pot.py writes the po files with native line endin

Re: po-files with trailing

On 04/07/2016 04:26 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: >> Using autotools, this is done via the msguniq program. I cannot tell how >> it is done with cmake, but I suspect that this is where the error >> occurs, and that this is why you get "\r" in the midd

Re: po-files with trailing

On 04/07/2016 03:13 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >> Pavel Sanda wrote: >>> Georg Baum wrote: python script we should forbid .po file remerging on windows IMHO. >>> Except it is Uwe who took the burden to be recipient of po updates sent to >>> po-upda...@lyx.org and care for

Layout Files for Incompatible Class Files

It seems to me that, despite Guenter's recent change of mind, there is a clear majority in favor of the policy that was proposed some time ago, discussed on the list, and then documented, in draft form, in Development.lyx, namely: > Every now and then, there are changes to LaTeX document classes

Re: acmsiggraph layout: update or new version?

On 04/05/2016 01:06 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-04-05, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 04/05/2016 04:36 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: >> >> +1 no new document class cluttering the selection list >>(especially as this is an "exotic&quo

Re: acmsiggraph layout: update or new version?

On 04/05/2016 06:15 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 10:41:42PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: >> Guenter Milde wrote: >> >>> On 2016-04-05, Richard Heck wrote: >>>> On 04/05/2016 04:36 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: >>>>>>> For the

Re: po-files with trailing

On 04/05/2016 06:17 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 5. April 2016 um 11:45:50, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > >> Le 05/04/2016 11:10, Kornel Benko a écrit : You mean by using a .gitattributes file? >>> Yes, but maybe there are better possibilities. >>> I checked

Re: patch for aastex6

On 04/05/2016 04:36 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-04-05, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: --] >> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:45:17AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >>> For the other patch (acmsiggraph.layout with incompatible version but same >>> cls file name), I

Re: patch for aastex6

On 04/04/2016 11:23 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:45:17AM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > >> For the other patch (acmsiggraph.layout with incompatible version but same >> cls file name), I would wait for an agreement whether to update the layout >> (file format change

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 04/03/2016 08:42 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: > Dear Richard and all, > > On 2016-04-02, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 04/02/2016 04:33 AM, Georg Baum wrote: >>> Guenter Milde wrote: >>>> I tried to start a chapter about new and updated layouts in >>>> D

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 04/02/2016 03:55 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > On 3/04/2016 5:11 a.m., Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2016-04-02, Andrew Parsloe wrote: >>> On 2/04/2016 8:17 p.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:23:05PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: > "Add a template and/or example file

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 04/02/2016 04:33 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: > >> I tried to start a chapter about new and updated layouts in >> Development.lyx. Of course, this is a biased view based on my experiences >> and ideas, so please correct and amend before this can be the base for a >> consensus.

Insert LyX Separator

Is there a menu entry for inserting LyX separators and paragraph breaks? I would have thought I'd find it under Insert> Formatting. Richard

Re: Bleeding-edge LyX

On 04/02/2016 05:26 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > Hullo Peter, > I've tried twice now to get a working bleeding-edge LyX (on a windows > 7 machine), since there have been occasions recently when it would > have been helpful to have someone testing latest commits on a windows > machine. Everything

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 04/02/2016 05:16 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > > > On 2/04/2016 8:17 p.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:23:05PM +, Guenter Milde wrote: >>> "Add a template and/or example file to lib/templates/ respectively >>> lib/examples/." >>> --> >>> (just a suggestion that sounds

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 04/01/2016 01:29 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 01/04/2016 18:15, Richard Heck a écrit : >> I do not know how to do the LaTeX part, but I am assuming someone else >> will. Once we have that, the idea would be to have a layout tag like: >> >> If

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 03/31/2016 05:35 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 12:53:15PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > >>> How about a "LyX layout repository" with supported¹ layouts at an >>> "official" URL (something like www.lyx.org/ressources/layouts/ or &

Re: patch for aastex6

On 03/31/2016 03:45 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: > >> For a safe "last minute commit", it would be good if somone could check >> the code itself, and the notes in the updated template and example file >> and then give an explicit +1 or not. > I did not test anything, but I looked

Re: patch for acmsiggraph

On 03/31/2016 02:27 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: > >> Thinking about it while writing aastex6.layout, there is a major >> disadvantage of the "old loads new" approach: >> >> * aastex6.layout inputs aastex.layout and currently only changes the name >> and referenced LaTeX class

Re: patch for acmsiggraph

On 03/30/2016 11:26 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: > Dear Lyxers, > > the "acmsiggraph" document class has been a source for headaches recently due > to an incompatible new version under the old name. > > I propose a patch which I ask you to review also under the perspective that > this may become an

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 03/29/2016 04:10 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-03-28, Richard Heck wrote: > > >> It would be nice, though it isn't essential, if there were some way to >> help people who needed it get the new layout. I'm not sure it is worth >> doing the whole auto-downlo

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 03/28/2016 05:34 PM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 03/28/2016 04:49 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2016-03-28, Richard Heck wrote: >>> On 03/28/2016 03:36 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: >>>> On 2016-03-28, Richard Heck wrote: >>>>> On 03/28/2016 06:50 AM, Ge

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 03/28/2016 04:49 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-03-28, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 03/28/2016 03:36 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: >>> On 2016-03-28, Richard Heck wrote: >>>> On 03/28/2016 06:50 AM, Georg Baum wrote: >>>>>>> 3bii. It is not

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 03/28/2016 03:36 PM, Guenter Milde wrote: > On 2016-03-28, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 03/28/2016 06:50 AM, Georg Baum wrote: >>>>> 3bii. It is not just that new styles have been added. >> I think it is going to be dang-near impossible to reach consensus on this &g

Re: Static member initialization ordering bug

On 03/28/2016 03:50 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > >> On 03/27/2016 03:09 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Therefore, if can happen than plain_insetlayout_ is initialized before >>> sane_font and inherit_font have been initialized, which creates the

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 03/28/2016 06:50 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > > On 03/25/2016 02:34 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > [This is about the case of a NEW class file, i.e., with a new name.] >> I don't myself see why we shouldn't add the new layout file, which is >> thi

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/27/2016 06:05 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 02:14:23PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > >> For now, then, let's just change the naming scheme so people have some >> better idea what these files are. OK? > +1 Committed. rh

Re: Static member initialization ordering bug

On 03/27/2016 04:43 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sonntag, 27. März 2016 um 16:33:12, schrieb Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> >> On 03/27/2016 03:09 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> Le 27/03/2016 19:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >>>> I suspect a compiler

Re: Static member initialization ordering bug

On 03/27/2016 03:09 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 27/03/2016 19:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> I suspect a compiler bug. What is your compiler? Can you try another >> one? > > I think I know what happens: in TextClass.cpp, we have > InsetLayout DocumentClass::plain_insetlayout_; > >

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/27/2016 01:13 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 27/03/2016 19:01, Richard Heck a écrit : >> Yes, that would be possible. Could this be done at program >> configuration? Don't we set up some version.h file at that time into >> which this could go? I don't rea

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/27/2016 12:52 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 27/03/2016 18:29, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 03/27/2016 03:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> We could have a dialog with a "don't show me again thing. And maybe >>> a way to disable the feature. &g

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/27/2016 03:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > We could have a dialog with a "don't show me again thing. And maybe a way to > disable the feature. > > Do we have a way to obtain the real world version number (2.1). This would be > easier to understand than 437. I think we'd just have to

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/27/2016 06:03 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > wrote: >> We could have a dialog with a "don't show me again thing. And maybe a way to >> disable the feature. >> >> Do we have a way to obtain the real world version

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/26/2016 11:35 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 11:32:40PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 03/26/2016 10:46 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: >>>> Also, do we mention this in Abo

Re: 2.2beta sometimes saves documents like *-347.lyx

On 03/26/2016 10:46 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Liviu Andronic wrote: >> Also, do we mention this in About > Release notes? I couldn't spot any >> reference to this... > Good idea. What do you think of the attached patch? That looks good to me. I'm not

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

Comments interspersed. Let me say right away that, as far as this goes, it all seems sensible. But, as I'll say below, it doesn't address what has always been the most serious problem. On 03/25/2016 02:34 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > 3. The LaTeX class file associated with the layout have been

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

On 03/25/2016 05:13 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > We should select different layout naming to be prepared for the case > that someone creates later a new foo1.cls file. Maybe our new layout > file names could have versioning independent of the underlying cls. Any such scheme will face some version of

Re: Proposal for a guide on updating layouts

I will comment on the rest later (which all seems fairly sensible), but for now On 03/25/2016 02:34 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > 2. We might find a bug in a layout file. > - [what do we do here? Any previous examples of this case?] This is not uncommon, and our policy, so far as I

Re: Handling of \SpecialChar

On 03/24/2016 06:16 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:27:32AM +1300, Andrew Parsloe wrote: >> I notice (in 2.2 beta2 on windows7) on typing LyX, TeX, LaTeX, LaTeX2e, that >> these strings are *not* converted to the logos. Nor does saving, closing and >> reopening the document

SSL Certificates

Hi, all, I've renewed our SSL certificates and thought I'd at least better explain how it's done. I've set up a very primitive ACME client for doing this, which is found at /home/rgheck/letsencrypt.sh/. The account key can be found there, too. To renew the certificates, you just have to do:

Re: inconsistent labeling of collapsed branch insets

On 02/29/2016 12:03 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:56:14AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 29/02/16 10:30, Liviu Andronic a écrit : >>> I have a document with a dozen branches, many of them collapsed... >>> Needless to say visually it's a mess. A more consistent

Re: New versions of LyX always hang multiple times. OS X

On 02/26/2016 05:30 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Feb 26, 2016, at 3:27 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Le 26/02/2016 11:09, Jerry a écrit : >>> On Feb 25, 2016, at 6:52 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes >>> wrote: >>> Le 25/02/2016 10:01, Jerry a écrit : >

Re: two ways to crash LyX 2.2 (Document Settings dialog open)

On 02/21/2016 10:35 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote: > On 02/20/2016 11:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote: >> One solution would be to have Buffer::collectChildren make sure the >> Buffers exist. > > I can confirm that your patch fixes the problem. Thanks, Richard! > > Scott, do you st

Re: two ways to crash LyX 2.2 (Document Settings dialog open)

On 02/20/2016 07:21 PM, PhilipPirrip wrote: > - 2 - > download and unpack > https://bitbucket.org/amiede/classicthesis/downloads/classicthesis-LyX-v4.2.zip > (it might 'work' with simpler master/child documents, I don't have > time to test it) > > > start lyx2.2 from terminal > > start a new

Re: two ways to crash LyX 2.2 (Document Settings dialog open)

On 02/20/2016 07:46 PM, PhilipPirrip wrote: > On 02/20/2016 07:40 PM, Richard Heck wrote: >> There's a missing test somewhere on whether the dialog needs a view, >> which this one does. The dialog should really be closed when the last >> view disappears. > > That's onl

Re: two ways to crash LyX 2.2 (Document Settings dialog open)

On 02/20/2016 07:21 PM, PhilipPirrip wrote: > Hey guys, I need you to confirm this (my config is Fedora Linux, fresh > master 89985beb, Qt 5.5.1): > > > - 1 - > start lyx2.2 from terminal > start a new document (ctrl-n) > open Document Settings dialog > close the new document (ctrl-w or

Re: two ways to crash LyX 2.2 (Document Settings dialog open)

On 02/20/2016 07:36 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 07:21:31PM -0500, PhilipPirrip wrote: >> Hey guys, I need you to confirm this (my config is Fedora Linux, fresh >> master 89985beb, Qt 5.5.1): > I confirm both. I will look into the first one. Hopefully the second one is >

Re: Disappearing borders in main window

On 02/20/2016 02:24 PM, Andrew Parsloe wrote: > I notice when beta2 has no document opened so that one is looking at > the "naked" LyX that the separator lines between the main window and > the outliner, and the main window and the source pane, have > disappeared (in windows 7); see the attached

Re: Enhancement Suggestion: Preamble Fixed-width Font

On 02/17/2016 09:09 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 18/02/2016 01:58, Richard Heck a écrit : >> On 02/17/2016 05:11 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >>> Guillaume Munch wrote: >>>> The attached patch copies code from the source panel, so it is safe. >>> I don't know wh

Re: Enhancement Suggestion: Preamble Fixed-width Font

On 02/17/2016 05:11 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: >> The attached patch copies code from the source panel, so it is safe. > I don't know what is the current beta policy, if Scott is fine with that it > has my +1. Tested? If so, has my +1, too. (No time myself right now.) rh

Re: [LyX/master] Preparing a helper script to creat md5sum of a file.

On 02/15/2016 09:25 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > +# Use-example in some CMakeLists.txt > +# > +# set(md5out ...) > +# set(fileToCheck ...) > +# add_custom_command( > +# OUTPUT ${md5out} > +# COMMAND ${CMAKE_COMMAND} > +# "-DFILE_TO_HANDLE=${fileToCheck}" > +# "-DMD5_OUTPUT=${md5out}" >

Re: Printer missing in 2.2.0beta1

On 02/12/2016 03:46 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 12/02/2016 09:38, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> But this doesn’t solve the problem how to print individual chapters. > > What do you mean? > > BTW Richard, what happened with the idea of reusing the Ctrl+P binding > for some printing-like

Re: [PATCHES] Tabular in collapsable inset improvements

On 02/03/2016 06:41 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Here is a series of patches that came from frustration with bug #9955. The main idea was to have different mouse cursor when clicking would select a tabular row/column. This would make the feature much more discoverable. 0001: the

Re: #9794: inset-modify tabular commands are incorrectly disabled

On 01/28/2016 07:11 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 um 13:03:02, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > >> Le 27/01/2016 18:55, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >>> I > have found the motivation to re-do the format increase and the patches >>> are now committed. >>

Re: new boost warning in LyX 2.1.x

On 01/24/2016 07:04 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> After the recent boost update in 2.1.x branch I get now many of these >> warnings: >> >> GraphicsCache.cpp >> CL : warning : Boost.Signals is no longer being maintained and is now >> deprecated. Please switch to Boost.Signals2. To

Re: [patch] fix bug 9925

On 01/24/2016 08:55 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > The date inset does currently not produce any output. This is a regression > of http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/f09a9fe2/lyxgit. Before that change it > did work only by accident: compare_timestamps() is called with two temp > files which both have

Re: [LyX/master] Do not allow paralist + enumitem modules

On 01/22/2016 03:57 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > commit cb2fe78a64e96aef1251096ab886adb8746e7b55 > Author: Georg Baum > Date: Fri Jan 22 21:55:40 2016 +0100 > > Do not allow paralist + enumitem modules > > As discussed on the list. The two modules can only be used together

Re: Development.lyx uncompilable

On 01/23/2016 05:47 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Samstag, 23. Januar 2016 um 21:22:02, schrieb Kornel Benko >> Latest version does not compile. >> All latex variants (pdflatex, lualatex, xelatex) fail. >> > Apparently lyx does not handle underscore in string specifying longest

Re: [PATCH] Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

On 01/21/2016 04:07 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> So is it a problem that compiling in C++11 mode is broken with gcc 4.6? I >> would guess not. > I guess it also depends how much space for error we have... > Richard, do you plan to release one intermediate 2.1.x or you

Re: What does new module paralist do?

On 01/18/2016 08:30 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hi Georg, you added a new module "paralist". What is this for? Do you have a documentation how to use this module? I would like to have at least a small example files in our examples folder. This assures that the module will be usable in future (e.g.

Re: What does new module paralist do?

On 01/18/2016 08:30 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hi Georg, you added a new module "paralist". What is this for? Do you have a documentation how to use this module? I would like to have at least a small example files in our examples folder. This assures that the module will be usable in future (e.g.

Re: What does new module paralist do?

On 01/19/2016 05:28 AM, Richard Heck wrote: On 01/18/2016 08:30 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hi Georg, you added a new module "paralist". What is this for? Do you have a documentation how to use this module? I would like to have at least a small example files in our examples folder. Th

Re: [LyX/master] Fix typos in paralist module. The correct command is not compactdescr, etc, but compactdesc. At least this is true in the most recent version on CTAN.

Since Uwe asked for an example file, I took it that he'd implicity +1'd it, so I went ahead and committed it. In creating it, I also ran into the problem fixed here. Seems like the request for an example file served its purpose! Richard On 01/19/2016 06:52 AM, Richard Heck wrote: commit

Re: [patch] - GIT - version control for LyX documents not detected

On 01/16/2016 05:27 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:13:23PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote: Perhaps a better fix is to disable QFileInfo caching or to call fi.refresh() every time in FileName::isFileEmpty()? Is anybody aware of other places having this kind of problem? Yes, I

Re: [LyX/master] Add \save_transient_properties parameter (#9841)

On 01/12/2016 04:36 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > > diff --git a/lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_2.py b/lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_2.py > index 5a639cd..5361420 100644 > --- a/lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_2.py > +++ b/lib/lyx2lyx/lyx_2_2.py > @@ -2184,6 +2184,23

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On 01/12/2016 06:53 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:49:54PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:04:33AM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> >>> For the symbol itself, my suggestion was a very elongated version of ⌟, >>> meant to recall the plain

Re: Windows: release with Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6?

On 01/12/2016 06:32 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Dear all, > > There is a question of whether we should release our binary for Windows > compiled against Qt 5.5.1 or 5.6.0. > > My opinion is that we should release it with 5.5.1, unless there is a > known, significant issue that affects LyX for

Re: Basic test of alpha1 tar

On 01/11/2016 05:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > At some time, I convinced my self that there is as much time spent in > toolbar updates than in painting itself. The reason is (would be) that > it uses BufferParams::isExportable which does a full graph search in > converters for each icon

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On 01/09/2016 05:24 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:34:47AM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> Le 11/12/2015 22:47, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 06:52:19PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > [...] • Defect: They tend to accumulate and they are

Re: beta release

On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1: >> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org >> >> JMarc did you have any other concerns with it? Does anyone else? > >

Re: "Splitting of consecutive environments has been reworked and enhanced"

On 01/09/2016 05:29 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 06:57:23PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> I also have another bug to report (very subtle and better seen in >> combination with the view source panel). There seems to be two cursor >> positions before and after the

Re: Tentative schedule for 2.2.0 release

On 01/08/2016 12:24 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:33:01AM -0800, José Matos wrote: >> On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 06:56:12 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> Yes file format freeze is before RC. Feature freeze will be before beta. >>> For discussion see: >>>

Re: Update boost in 2.1 branch?

On 01/08/2016 05:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Currently we use boost 1.53 in 2.1 branch. Would it be a good move to > update it to 1.60? I am getting loads of warnings with gcc 5.1. Fine with me, and I see the same warnings. Richard

Re: [PATCH] minor visual improvements for paper and foils classes

On 01/04/2016 08:44 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:59:02AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Here is a small patch that fixes small annoying things in two classes >> * for paper, show properly on screen starred section with sans serif font >> * for foil,

Re: #9794: inset-modify tabular commands are incorrectly disabled

On 01/03/2016 02:25 PM, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 03/01/2016 09:46, Georg Baum a écrit : >> Guillaume Munch wrote: >> >>> Regarding http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9794, I had two questions >>> below >>> before making the requested changes: >>> >>> Le 29/12/2015 00:27, LyX Ticket Tracker a écrit

Re: Style question

On 01/03/2016 10:59 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 02:37:23PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 03/01/2016 10:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Attached patch OK? If so, I would put it in at the beginning of the 2.3.0 cycle. From

Re: [patch] Display the correct horizontal alignment in AMS environments

On 01/03/2016 08:30 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 03/01/2016 12:04, Georg Baum a écrit : >>> Yes , sort of. I cannot tell that it really works, but if it does not, >>> it would not be too dangerous :) >> >> Really? The amount of code changes is big, and I cannot see from the >> patch >>

Re: Request for DIFFERENT reset button in LyX: Text Style window.

On 01/02/2016 02:32 PM, Michael Cwikel wrote: > > Dear Developers: > > I currently use LyX 2.4.1 under Windows 8.1. > > Please consider developing the following feature: > > A new reset button in the LyX: Text Style window to instantly change all > seven 'entries' in that window to all become "No

Re: #9794: inset-modify tabular commands are incorrectly disabled

On 01/03/2016 04:46 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> Regarding http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9794, I had two questions below >> before making the requested changes: >> >> Le 29/12/2015 00:27, LyX Ticket Tracker a écrit : >>> #9794: inset-modify tabular commands are incorrectly

Re: Questions for Uwe?

On 01/03/2016 04:40 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Uwe will be back in a few days. It would be nice to release beta1 soon > after he is back so it would be nice to consolidate some questions we > might have for him so he has just one email that he needs to look at. Do > you have any questions for

Re: Style question

On 01/03/2016 11:18 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:01:42AM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 01/03/2016 10:59 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 02:37:23PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>>> Le 03/01/2016

Fwd: fr.po for master

Please see below about a compilation error. Richard Forwarded Message Subject:fr.po for master Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 09:17:57 + From: Jean-Pierre Chrétien Reply-To: jeanpierre.chret...@free.fr To: po-upda...@lyx.org

[PATCH] Bug 9907: Master-Child Closing Crash

rom d749c635dce01418b8623710d4287d1c9fd62cb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 11:50:18 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fix bug 9907. The problem was that, when closing one Buffer, we were closing all of its children, even if they were open as children of some other Buffer. --- src/B

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >