[PATCH] Make the export of macros thread-safer

In general, the metrics() functions should not change the Buffer; we have updateBuffer/updateMacros for that purpose. --- src/mathed/MathMacroTemplate.cpp |8 ++-- src/mathed/MathMacroTemplate.h |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Georg Baum georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.dewrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:49:44PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I tried to use QThreadStorage, which works on Windows, but on Linux I keep getting segmentation faults

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

The other difference I noticed is that on Cygwin and Solaris I get \renewcommand instead of \newcommand. That is, applying your patch, on Debian exporting from the GUI or from command line, produces the same result, but lyx segafaults on exit. On Cygwin and Solaris, exporting from the GUI

Re: Datalosses

Op 4-10-2013 10:51, Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Pavel Sanda wrote: It was trimmed or with garbage like in #8854? Trimmed. As said, it stopped at the beginning of a tabular inset. No garbage. Jürgen Hi Jurgen, How do you feel about this ? Time to investigate further, or is it relatively

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Georg Baum <georg.b...@post.rwth-aachen.de>wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:49:44PM +0200, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > >> > >> I tried to use QThreadStorage, which works on Windo

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

The other difference I noticed is that on Cygwin and Solaris I get > \renewcommand instead of \newcommand. That is, applying your patch, > on Debian exporting from the GUI or from command line, produces the > same result, but lyx segafaults on exit. > On Cygwin and Solaris, exporting from the GUI

Re: Datalosses

Op 4-10-2013 10:51, Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Pavel Sanda wrote: It was trimmed or with garbage like in #8854? Trimmed. As said, it stopped at the beginning of a tabular inset. No garbage. Jürgen Hi Jurgen, How do you feel about this ? Time to investigate further, or is it relatively

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 8-10-2013 14:30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: 08/10/2013 14:24, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: 07/10/2013 23:24, Georg Baum: I don't remember the mutex story, however the problem is surely due to the static output buffer in iconv_convert. The question is: why was it made static? For performance

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 8-10-2013 14:30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: 08/10/2013 14:24, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: 07/10/2013 23:24, Georg Baum: I don't remember the mutex story, however the problem is surely due to the static output buffer in iconv_convert. The question is: why was it made static? For performance

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 6-10-2013 18:09, Richard Heck schreef: I just wanted to call everyone's attention to this bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8854 It appears to be a very nasty dataloss bug in 2.1-beta1. What seems to be happening is that, on save, the LyX file is corrupted in very weird ways, with random

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 7-10-2013 21:05, Enrico Forestieri schreef: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause, and, indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along. Actually, all my files are converted correctly. But

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 7-10-2013 21:05, Enrico Forestieri schreef: So, the bug also depends on the structure of the document, somehow. Is the registered trademark symbol on line 460 and 480 of the lyx file the problem maybe ? Vincent

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 7-10-2013 21:18, Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: Op 7-10-2013 21:05, Enrico Forestieri schreef: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause, and, indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 6-10-2013 18:09, Richard Heck schreef: I just wanted to call everyone's attention to this bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8854 It appears to be a very nasty dataloss bug in 2.1-beta1. What seems to be happening is that, on save, the LyX file is corrupted in very weird ways, with random

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 7-10-2013 21:05, Enrico Forestieri schreef: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause, and, indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along. Actually, all my files are converted correctly. But

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 7-10-2013 21:05, Enrico Forestieri schreef: So, the bug also depends on the structure of the document, somehow. Is the registered trademark symbol on line 460 and 480 of the lyx file the problem maybe ? Vincent

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 7-10-2013 21:18, Vincent van Ravesteijn schreef: Op 7-10-2013 21:05, Enrico Forestieri schreef: On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 02:28:18PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: It is very strange that I can't reproduce, if this is the cause, and, indeed, that people haven't been seeing this bug all along

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 6-10-2013 18:09, Richard Heck schreef: I just wanted to call everyone's attention to this bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8854 It appears to be a very nasty dataloss bug in 2.1-beta1. What seems to be happening is that, on save, the LyX file is corrupted in very weird ways, with random

Re: 2.1.0 Blocker

Op 6-10-2013 18:09, Richard Heck schreef: I just wanted to call everyone's attention to this bug: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8854 It appears to be a very nasty dataloss bug in 2.1-beta1. What seems to be happening is that, on save, the LyX file is corrupted in very weird ways, with random

Re: Make distclean failure

Op 30-9-2013 17:49, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: 29/09/2013 17:57, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 17-8-2013 11:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: It stops at .deps/AppleSpellChecker.Po and other .deps/*.Po which are unknown. Jürgen This still fails for me. Is anyone around who knows how to fix

Re: Make distclean failure

Op 30-9-2013 17:49, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: 29/09/2013 17:57, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 17-8-2013 11:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: It stops at .deps/AppleSpellChecker.Po and other .deps/*.Po which are unknown. Jürgen This still fails for me. Is anyone around who knows how to fix

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

Op 27-9-2013 23:53, Stephan Witt schreef: Regarding the details: * BufferEncoding.cpp is a manual copy of Encoding.cpp - that's why the wrong comment - that's why the name of the file - that's why the superfluous includes * CharInfo was a private struct - I've made a class to make it more

Re: Make distclean failure

Op 17-8-2013 11:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: It stops at .deps/AppleSpellChecker.Po and other .deps/*.Po which are unknown. Jürgen This still fails for me. Is anyone around who knows how to fix this ? Vincent

Re: Make distclean failure

Op 29-9-2013 18:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: This still fails for me. Is anyone around who knows how to fix this ? Last time, removing subdir-objects from AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE in configure.ac helped. Jürgen Well, I just added this again. So.. does this mean we

Re: Make distclean failure

Op 17-8-2013 11:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: It stops at .deps/AppleSpellChecker.Po and other .deps/*.Po which are unknown. Jürgen The culprit seems to be the following line in the output of make distclean: rm -rf ../.deps ../graphics/.deps ../insets/.deps .deps while being in the

[PATCH] Fix make distclean

This only cleans the .deps directories that won't be needed later on. --- This fixes it for me. Any comments on this ? Vincent src/support/Makefile.am |4 src/tex2lyx/Makefile.am |4 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/support/Makefile.am

Re: [PATCH] Fix make distclean

Op 29-9-2013 22:16, Stephan Witt schreef: Am 29.09.2013 um 21:48 schrieb Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org: Stephan Witt wrote: I cannot imagine how a rm -f can fail, so the leading minus is not needed. If DEPDIR doesn't exists it will fail. P No. It will not fail. That's the effect of -f. Stephan

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

Op 27-9-2013 23:53, Stephan Witt schreef: Regarding the details: * BufferEncoding.cpp is a manual copy of Encoding.cpp - that's why the wrong comment - that's why the name of the file - that's why the superfluous includes * CharInfo was a private struct - I've made a class to make it more

Re: Make distclean failure

Op 17-8-2013 11:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: It stops at .deps/AppleSpellChecker.Po and other .deps/*.Po which are unknown. Jürgen This still fails for me. Is anyone around who knows how to fix this ? Vincent

Re: Make distclean failure

Op 29-9-2013 18:50, Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: This still fails for me. Is anyone around who knows how to fix this ? Last time, removing subdir-objects from AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE in configure.ac helped. Jürgen Well, I just added this again. So.. does this mean we

Re: Make distclean failure

Op 17-8-2013 11:38, Jürgen Spitzmüller schreef: It stops at .deps/AppleSpellChecker.Po and other .deps/*.Po which are unknown. Jürgen The culprit seems to be the following line in the output of "make distclean": rm -rf ../.deps ../graphics/.deps ../insets/.deps .deps while being in the

[PATCH] Fix make distclean

This only cleans the .deps directories that won't be needed later on. --- This fixes it for me. Any comments on this ? Vincent src/support/Makefile.am |4 src/tex2lyx/Makefile.am |4 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/support/Makefile.am

Re: [PATCH] Fix make distclean

Op 29-9-2013 22:16, Stephan Witt schreef: Am 29.09.2013 um 21:48 schrieb Pavel Sanda : Stephan Witt wrote: I cannot imagine how a "rm -f" can fail, so the leading minus is not needed. If DEPDIR doesn't exists it will fail. P No. It will not fail. That's the effect of "-f".

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

- The commit about splitting the encoding stuff and moving helper functions into a new class, should really have some explanation why this is needed, and why we would need a new class for this. The construction around CharInfo becomes rather strange. It is defined in Encoding.cpp, which

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

- The commit about splitting the encoding stuff and moving helper functions into a new class, should really have some explanation why this is needed, and why we would need a new class for this. The construction around CharInfo becomes rather strange. It is defined in Encoding.cpp, which

Re: LyX unit testing

Op 19-9-2013 8:37, Hashini Senaratne schreef: Hello Vincent, But in general, I would like to introduce unit testing, yes. Currently, is there any guide that I can follow, how the suggested testframe work can be set to the LyX environment? Thanks Hashini Hi Hashini, I'm not sure what

Re: LyX unit testing

Op 19-9-2013 8:37, Hashini Senaratne schreef: Hello Vincent, But in general, I would like to introduce unit testing, yes. Currently, is there any guide that I can follow, how the suggested testframe work can be set to the LyX environment? Thanks Hashini Hi Hashini, I'm not sure what

Re: LyX unit testing

Op 16-9-2013 8:16, Scott Kostyshak schreef: Hi Vincent, Do you have any plans to merge the gtest code http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/vfr/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/tests into master after the 2.1 release? Does it still need a lot of work before it should be merged? Hashini has expressed

Re: LyX unit testing

Op 16-9-2013 8:16, Scott Kostyshak schreef: Hi Vincent, Do you have any plans to merge the gtest code http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/vfr/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/tests into master after the 2.1 release? Does it still need a lot of work before it should be merged? Hashini has expressed

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

Op 6-9-2013 11:59, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: 28/08/2013 22:45, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Hi all, I think it's time to start thinking about what is needed before we can release beta2. Please reply if you know about any issues so that I won't be able to overlook them. I would like to merge

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote: 10/09/2013 09:01, Vincent van Ravesteijn: I had a look at the branch, and I have the following comments: - In the commit logs, it is nowhere mentioned why the cleanups are necessary. Indeed... But removing

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

Op 6-9-2013 11:59, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: 28/08/2013 22:45, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Hi all, I think it's time to start thinking about what is needed before we can release beta2. Please reply if you know about any issues so that I won't be able to overlook them. I would like to merge

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org>wrote: > 10/09/2013 09:01, Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > I had a look at the branch, and I have the following comments: >> >> - In the commit logs, it is nowhere mentioned why the cleanups are &g

Re: Fix make distcheck

Op 8-9-2013 19:40, Georg Baum schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Ok, thanks for having a look at it. I came up with a rather basic version. I did not test the new targets with anything else than GNU make and GNU bash, but since they are mainly for our own use I don't consider

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

Op 9-9-2013 11:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: 06/09/2013 14:35, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Are you asking me? This is too much autotools for me to say something wise about it. All I can do is to ask people to test. If no-one reports a problem, it will be ok. Well, I pushed it for maximal

Re: Fix make distcheck

Op 8-9-2013 19:40, Georg Baum schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Ok, thanks for having a look at it. I came up with a rather basic version. I did not test the new targets with anything else than GNU make and GNU bash, but since they are mainly for our own use I don't consider

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

Op 9-9-2013 15:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: 28/08/2013 22:45, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Hi all, I think it's time to start thinking about what is needed before we can release beta2. Please reply if you know about any issues so that I won't be able to overlook them. What is the status

Re: Fix make distcheck

Op 9-9-2013 1:55, Pavel Sanda schreef: Georg Baum wrote: OK to go in? I tested this patch helps here. We are still having the problem I registered some time ago with cleaning up the tree from new pot files: It works for me. Vincent

Re: Fix make distcheck

Op 9-9-2013 21:47, Pavel Sanda schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 9-9-2013 1:55, Pavel Sanda schreef: Georg Baum wrote: OK to go in? I tested this patch helps here. We are still having the problem I registered some time ago with cleaning up the tree from new pot files: It works

Re: Fix "make distcheck"

Op 8-9-2013 19:40, Georg Baum schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Ok, thanks for having a look at it. I came up with a rather basic version. I did not test the new targets with anything else than GNU make and GNU bash, but since they are mainly for our own use I don't consider

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

Op 9-9-2013 11:05, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: 06/09/2013 14:35, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Are you asking me? This is too much autotools for me to say something wise about it. All I can do is to ask people to test. If no-one reports a problem, it will be ok. Well, I pushed it for maximal

Re: Fix "make distcheck"

Op 8-9-2013 19:40, Georg Baum schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Ok, thanks for having a look at it. I came up with a rather basic version. I did not test the new targets with anything else than GNU make and GNU bash, but since they are mainly for our own use I don't consider

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

Op 9-9-2013 15:50, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: 28/08/2013 22:45, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Hi all, I think it's time to start thinking about what is needed before we can release beta2. Please reply if you know about any issues so that I won't be able to overlook them. What is the status

Re: Fix "make distcheck"

Op 9-9-2013 1:55, Pavel Sanda schreef: Georg Baum wrote: OK to go in? I tested this patch helps here. We are still having the problem I registered some time ago with cleaning up the tree from new pot files: It works for me. Vincent

Re: Fix "make distcheck"

Op 9-9-2013 21:47, Pavel Sanda schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 9-9-2013 1:55, Pavel Sanda schreef: Georg Baum wrote: OK to go in? I tested this patch helps here. We are still having the problem I registered some time ago with cleaning up the tree from new pot files: It works

Re: back from vacation

Op 6-9-2013 22:50, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Dear clooeagues, sorry for my silence. I am now back but will not have much time until the German election September 22. I try to commit the docs stuff I received and also the po-files. Anything I need to know, deadlines etc.? I'm now wrapping up to

Re: back from vacation

Op 6-9-2013 22:50, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Dear clooeagues, sorry for my silence. I am now back but will not have much time until the German election September 22. I try to commit the docs stuff I received and also the po-files. Anything I need to know, deadlines etc.? I'm now wrapping up to

Re: back from vacation

Sounds good. Should we switch the default UI language to de_DE before beta 2 is out then? Pavel Sorry, I don't like this kind of last-minute changes. Can you postpone this patch till after beta 2? Vincent

Re: back from vacation

Sounds good. Should we switch the default UI language to de_DE before beta 2 is out then? Pavel Sorry, I don't like this kind of last-minute changes. Can you postpone this patch till after beta 2? Vincent

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote: 06/09/2013 07:53, Pavel Sanda: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Please reply if you know about any issues so that I won't be able to overlook them. #8783 Here is a patch for this one. OK? JMarc Are you

Re: LyX + Qt5 + CMake + XCode - attached files (1/1)

Is this for branch 2.0.x or for master? Indeed it seems that the Qt5 porting missed the Q_WS_xx defines, that need to be reevaluated one by one. Vincent, what is your take on this? I indeed read that the Q_WS_* defines were replaced, but at the same time, it still seemed to work so I assumed

Re: Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org>wrote: > 06/09/2013 07:53, Pavel Sanda: > > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> >>> Please reply if you know about any issues so that I won't be able to >>> overlook them. >>>

Re: LyX + Qt5 + CMake + XCode - attached files (1/1)

> > Is this for branch 2.0.x or for master? Indeed it seems that the Qt5 > porting missed the Q_WS_xx defines, that need to be reevaluated one by one. > Vincent, what is your take on this? > > I indeed read that the Q_WS_* defines were replaced, but at the same time, it still seemed to work so I

Re: Fix make distcheck

Op 3-9-2013 21:12, Georg Baum schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Is there any volunteer that wants to fix the Autotools distcheck target ? This basically comes down to stripping the new tests from the check target and to introduce a different target to run the tests. I'm

Re: Fix "make distcheck"

Op 3-9-2013 21:12, Georg Baum schreef: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Is there any volunteer that wants to fix the Autotools "distcheck" target ? This basically comes down to stripping the new tests from the "check" target and to introduce a different target to

Re: PATCH: automatic copying and migration of elder user config directories Was: LyX user directory path on Mac contains PACKAGE

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: Am 02.09.2013 um 16:42 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.org: 01/09/2013 20:06, Stephan Witt: What is the status on this work ? Do you still want to get it in beta 2 ? Yes, please. I've answered already in

Fix make distcheck

Is there any volunteer that wants to fix the Autotools distcheck target ? This basically comes down to stripping the new tests from the check target and to introduce a different target to run the tests. I'm not that experienced with Makefiles, that's why I'm asking. Vincent

Re: PATCH: automatic copying and migration of elder user config directories Was: LyX user directory path on Mac contains PACKAGE

On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 02.09.2013 um 16:42 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > > 01/09/2013 20:06, Stephan Witt: > >>> What is the status on this work ? Do you still want to get it in beta > 2 ? > >> > >> Yes, please. I've

Fix "make distcheck"

Is there any volunteer that wants to fix the Autotools "distcheck" target ? This basically comes down to stripping the new tests from the "check" target and to introduce a different target to run the tests. I'm not that experienced with Makefiles, that's why I'm asking. Vincent

Re: getting bibtex-database-name via LFUN

Op 31-8-2013 1:42, newslet...@semiotikon.de schreef: Hi, i am currently working on a bibliography management tool based on XULRunner. Right now i'm about to implement the pushing of citations to lyx. I have read the code of Petr Simon the first developer of lyz. What he did to manage

Re: cmake build: man pages

Op 25-8-2013 13:31, Kornel Benko schreef: Am Dienstag, 20. August 2013 um 15:12:48, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org Am Freitag, 16. August 2013 um 10:04:15, schrieb Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org Kornel Benko wrote: This can be overridden by call to cmake. It's a default only.

Re: [PATCH] Add outline-{up,down} to alt-{up,down} binding

Op 7-8-2013 9:01, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 06/11/2013 12:21 AM, Pavel Sanda

Re: PATCH: automatic copying and migration of elder user config directories Was: LyX user directory path on Mac contains PACKAGE

Op 31-7-2013 15:46, Richard Heck schreef: On 07/30/2013 04:34 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 30.07.2013 um 15:56 schrieb Stephan Wittst.w...@gmx.net: Am 29.07.2013 um 10:05 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüllersp...@lyx.org: Stephan Witt wrote: Please no. Why not make it a parameter to lyx:

Re: [PATCH] Re: feature request: allowing Update Master Document command in master document

Op 17-7-2013 11:25, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 16/07/2013 06:48, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: OK, let's keep it as it is right now. Shall I commit it somewhere now or wait? I would put it into master. P Vincent, can I commit this somewhere? JMarc I put it in.

Re: getting bibtex-database-name via LFUN

Op 31-8-2013 1:42, newslet...@semiotikon.de schreef: Hi, i am currently working on a bibliography management tool based on XULRunner. Right now i'm about to implement the pushing of citations to lyx. I have read the code of Petr Simon the first developer of lyz. What he did to manage

Re: cmake build: man pages

Op 25-8-2013 13:31, Kornel Benko schreef: Am Dienstag, 20. August 2013 um 15:12:48, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Freitag, 16. August 2013 um 10:04:15, schrieb Pavel Sanda > > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > This can be overridden by call to cmake. It's a

Re: [PATCH] Add outline-{up,down} to alt-{up,down} binding

Op 7-8-2013 9:01, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Richard Heck wrote: On 06/11/2013 12:21 AM, Pavel

Re: PATCH: automatic copying and migration of elder user config directories Was: LyX user directory path on Mac contains PACKAGE

Op 31-7-2013 15:46, Richard Heck schreef: On 07/30/2013 04:34 PM, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 30.07.2013 um 15:56 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 29.07.2013 um 10:05 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: Stephan Witt wrote: Please no. Why not make it a parameter to lyx:

Re: [PATCH] Re: feature request: allowing "Update Master Document" command in master document

Op 17-7-2013 11:25, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef: Le 16/07/2013 06:48, Pavel Sanda a écrit : Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: OK, let's keep it as it is right now. Shall I commit it somewhere now or wait? I would put it into master. P Vincent, can I commit this somewhere? JMarc I put it in.

Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

Hi all, I think it's time to start thinking about what is needed before we can release beta2. Please reply if you know about any issues so that I won't be able to overlook them. Vincentl

Lyx2.1.0beta2 issues ?

Hi all, I think it's time to start thinking about what is needed before we can release beta2. Please reply if you know about any issues so that I won't be able to overlook them. Vincentl

Re: Test

Re: Test

Re: role of export tests in 'make test'

Op 7-8-2013 9:01, Scott Kostyshak schreef: Should 'make test' run export tests at all? If so, which LaTeX I think it shouldn't. If you insist on them they should be skipped not err if tex class is missing. I don't have a preference here. You, Vincent, and Kornel should decide and I will read

Re: role of export tests in 'make test'

Op 7-8-2013 13:24, Kornel Benko schreef: I've come to the conclusion that export tests should NOT be in make check. +1, but I could not find the place where 'make check' does export? I was just answering Scott's question whether export tests should be or should not be in make check.

Re: role of export tests in 'make test'

Op 7-8-2013 9:01, Scott Kostyshak schreef: Should 'make test' run export tests at all? If so, which LaTeX I think it shouldn't. If you insist on them they should be skipped not err if tex class is missing. I don't have a preference here. You, Vincent, and Kornel should decide and I will read

Re: role of export tests in 'make test'

Op 7-8-2013 13:24, Kornel Benko schreef: > I've come to the conclusion that export tests should NOT be in make check. +1, but I could not find the place where 'make check' does export? I was just answering Scott's question whether export tests should be or should not be in make check.

Re: [PATCH] CMake: tests now fail if no default_output_format

Op 4-8-2013 22:23, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: About the patch... why do we care

Re: [PATCH] CMake: tests now fail if no default_output_format

Op 5-8-2013 13:07, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org wrote: Op 4-8-2013 22:23, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn v

Re: [PATCH] CMake: tests now fail if no default_output_format

Op 5-8-2013 14:37, Kornel Benko schreef: Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:22:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:01:08, schrieb Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org On Mon, Aug

Re: [PATCH] CMake: tests now fail if no default_output_format

Op 3-8-2013 9:54, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org wrote: Am Freitag, 2. August 2013 um 20:06:40, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn v...@lyx.org Why should we update? This is also the test for lyx2lyx, isn't it? No, this is not the way to test

Re: [LyX/master] * cs.po

Op 5 aug. 2013 22:21 schreef Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org het volgende: Pavel Sanda wrote: -POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-05 13:08-0700\n +POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-05 13:11-0700\n BTW Vincent, what version of gettext you use? Got lot of merge conflicts last time. Pavel Default of Ubuntu

Re: [PATCH] Fix Viewing of XHTML with Math as Images

Op 5 aug. 2013 23:25 schreef Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org het volgende: On 08/04/2013 05:43 PM, Richard Heck wrote: The attached patch explains the problem and offers a simple solution. This is master-only, and it needs to go into 2.1. OK? Someone want to approve this? or not? Richard

Re: [PATCH] CMake: tests now fail if no default_output_format

Op 4-8-2013 22:23, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote: On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> wrote: On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: About the

Re: [PATCH] CMake: tests now fail if no default_output_format

Op 5-8-2013 13:07, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> wrote: Op 4-8-2013 22:23, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> wrote: On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 5:58 AM,

Re: [PATCH] CMake: tests now fail if no default_output_format

Op 5-8-2013 14:37, Kornel Benko schreef: Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:22:19, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Montag, 5. August 2013 um 08:01:08, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > >

Re: [PATCH] CMake: tests now fail if no default_output_format

Op 3-8-2013 9:54, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Kornel Benko <kor...@lyx.org> wrote: Am Freitag, 2. August 2013 um 20:06:40, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn <v...@lyx.org> Why should we update? This is also the test for lyx2lyx, isn't it? No, this is

Re: [LyX/master] * cs.po

Op 5 aug. 2013 22:21 schreef "Pavel Sanda" het volgende: > > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > -"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-05 13:08-0700\n" > > +"POT-Creation-Date: 2013-08-05 13:11-0700\n" > > BTW Vincent, what version of gettext you use? > Got lot of merge conflicts last time. > Pavel

Re: [PATCH] Fix Viewing of XHTML with Math as Images

Op 5 aug. 2013 23:25 schreef "Richard Heck" het volgende: > > On 08/04/2013 05:43 PM, Richard Heck wrote: >> >> >> The attached patch explains the problem and offers a simple solution. This is master-only, and it needs to go into 2.1. OK? > > > Someone want to approve this? or

Re: [LyX/master] tex2lyx roundtrip: expand diff to bu usefull to files created by lyx

Op 4-8-2013 16:20, Kornel Benko schreef: commit d3245d4cd20b54701af2465a825183cd105b1f56 Author: Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org Date: Sun Aug 4 15:57:01 2013 +0200 tex2lyx roundtrip: expand diff to bu usefull to files created by lyx Otherwise the comparision used by

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >