Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-08-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Stephan == Stephan Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephan I think so. The find command on Solaris 2.7 prints all files Stephan otherwise. I'm not sure if this makes sense in any case, but Stephan it is like that. Old BSD find did nothing when no action like Stephan -print or -ls was missing.

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-08-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> I think so. The find command on Solaris 2.7 prints all files Stephan> otherwise. I'm not sure if this makes sense in any case, but Stephan> it is like that. Old BSD find did nothing when no action like Stephan> "-print" or "-ls"

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Stephan == Stephan Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephan as far as I know I would do it like that: Stephan find path-name-list \( -name foo -o -name bar \) -print Indeed, thanks. Nirmal, would find src \( -name '*.[Cch]' -or -name '*.C.in' \) work? If it does, I will use that. JMarc

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 15, 2004, at 9:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Stephan == Stephan Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephan as far as I know I would do it like that: Stephan find path-name-list \( -name foo -o -name bar \) -print Indeed, thanks. Nirmal, would find src \( -name '*.[Cch]' -or -name

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bennett On Jul 15, 2004, at 9:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Stephan == Stephan Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephan as far as I know I would do it like that: Stephan find path-name-list \( -name foo -o -name bar \) -print Indeed,

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Stephan Witt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Bennett == Bennett Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bennett On Jul 15, 2004, at 9:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Stephan == Stephan Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephan as far as I know I would do it like that: Stephan find path-name-list \( -name foo -o -name bar

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Stephan == Stephan Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephan if you call me a nit-picker... maybe, you're right. But: Stephan I wrote find path-name-list \( -name foo -o -name bar \) Stephan -print. Stephan The command find src \( -name '*.[Cch]' -or -name '*.C.in' Stephan \) is a (unneeded)

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Stephan Witt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Stephan == Stephan Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephan if you call me a nit-picker... maybe, you're right. But: Stephan I wrote find path-name-list \( -name foo -o -name bar \) Stephan -print. Stephan The command find src \( -name '*.[Cch]' -or -name '*.C.in'

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> as far as I know I would do it like that: Stephan> find path-name-list \( -name foo -o -name bar \) -print Indeed, thanks. Nirmal, would find src \( -name '*.[Cch]' -or -name '*.C.in' \) work? If it does, I will use that.

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Bennett Helm
On Jul 15, 2004, at 9:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> as far as I know I would do it like that: Stephan> find path-name-list \( -name foo -o -name bar \) -print Indeed, thanks. Nirmal, would find src \( -name '*.[Cch]' -or -name

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> On Jul 15, 2004, at 9:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Stephan> as far as I know I would do it like that: >> Stephan> find path-name-list \( -name foo -o -name

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Stephan Witt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bennett> On Jul 15, 2004, at 9:10 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> as far as I know I would do it like that: Stephan> find path-name-list \( -name foo

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> if you call me a nit-picker... maybe, you're right. But: Stephan> I wrote "find path-name-list \( -name foo -o -name bar \) Stephan> -print". Stephan> The command "find src \( -name '*.[Cch]' -or -name '*.C.in' Stephan> \)" is

Re: 'find' portability problem

2004-07-15 Thread Stephan Witt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Stephan" == Stephan Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> if you call me a nit-picker... maybe, you're right. But: Stephan> I wrote "find path-name-list \( -name foo -o -name bar \) Stephan> -print". Stephan> The command "find src \( -name '*.[Cch]' -or -name

'find' portability problem (was Re: LyX and OS X)

2004-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Nirmal == Nirmal Govind [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello lyx-devel, I continue this private discussion with Nirmal and Bennett here, since I am sure somebody will come up with the one true find syntax we need. The problem is that compilation hangs in po, and the reason is the following find

Re: 'find' portability problem (was Re: LyX and OS X)

2004-07-13 Thread Stephan Witt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Nirmal == Nirmal Govind [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello lyx-devel, I continue this private discussion with Nirmal and Bennett here, since I am sure somebody will come up with the one true find syntax we need. The problem is that compilation hangs in po, and the reason

'find' portability problem (was Re: LyX and OS X)

2004-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Nirmal" == Nirmal Govind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hello lyx-devel, I continue this private discussion with Nirmal and Bennett here, since I am sure somebody will come up with the one true find syntax we need. The problem is that compilation hangs in po, and the reason is the following

Re: 'find' portability problem (was Re: LyX and OS X)

2004-07-13 Thread Stephan Witt
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Nirmal" == Nirmal Govind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hello lyx-devel, I continue this private discussion with Nirmal and Bennett here, since I am sure somebody will come up with the one true find syntax we need. The problem is that compilation hangs in po, and the