On 01-Aug-2001 Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
Let's look at the two reason why you added the language_inherit
Juergen, I actually agreed with Dekel in this case.
Let me try to explain why:
[snip]
Well I agree with both of you! I always said that
On 02-Aug-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Asger Now, language is not an ortogonal properties of text. Instead,
Asger it's a coupled property. You can not logically change the
Asger language of the text without changing the text itself, and vice
Asger versa.
So what is the language of
On 01-Aug-2001 Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
>> Let's look at the two reason why you added the language_inherit
>
> Juergen, I actually agreed with Dekel in this case.
>
> Let me try to explain why:
[snip]
Well I agree with both of you! I always
On 02-Aug-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Asger> Now, language is not an ortogonal properties of text. Instead,
> Asger> it's a coupled property. You can not logically change the
> Asger> language of the text without changing the text itself, and vice
> Asger> versa.
>
> So what is the
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 09:38:56AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
Let's look at the two reason why you added the language_inherit
1) Consistency with other font properties
2) Previously, a special code was needed to set the language when creating
an empty insettext. So the change simplifies
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 09:38:56AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
Let's look at the two reason why you added the language_inherit
1) Consistency with other font properties
2) Previously, a special code was needed to set the language when creating
an empty insettext. So the change simplifies
On 28-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
1. When you copy text from English document to French document, the
language of the text remains language_inherit, so the text will now be
considered as French instead of English.
When copying to the clipboard, you do need to store the language of the
On 28-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> 1. When you copy text from English document to French document, the
> language of the text remains language_inherit, so the text will now be
> considered as French instead of English.
> When copying to the clipboard, you do need to store the language of the
>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:03:07PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
We didn't need inherit language before, so we don't need one now.
You surely meant we didn't have an inherit_language before and we have
seen we need one so that all of it is working correctly, isn't it?
Up until a week ago we
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 03:03:07PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> > We didn't need inherit language before, so we don't need one now.
>
> You surely meant we didn't have an inherit_language before and we have
> seen we need one so that all of it is working correctly, isn't it?
Up until a week
On 27-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
And it should probably not be output in the .lyx file. Probably a few
changes in lyxfont.C will be enough.
It HAS to be outputed, BUT as the document_wide language, otherwise we're
not able to switch back and remain in the previously defined
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 12:03:04PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
On 27-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
And it should probably not be output in the .lyx file. Probably a few
changes in lyxfont.C will be enough.
It HAS to be outputed, BUT as the document_wide language, otherwise
On 27-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
Why the language in insetERT is changed to ignore_language ???
No your're right it should be inherit_language and now it is!
The correct way for implementing insetERT is to have an InsetEditor and use
Your free to provide one!
it instead of insetText.
On 27-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The interesting methods in LyX Font are
/** Reduce font to fall back to template where possible.
Equal fields are reduced to INHERIT */
void reduce(LyXFont const tmplt);
/// Realize font from a template (INHERIT
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:15:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Dekel Why the language in insetERT is changed to ignore_language ???
We need a way to say inherit language. This works well for everything
in a font when one specifies ALL_INHERIT, _except_ for language. Why?
Because the
On 27-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
Because the language property is not inherited.
If you write some text in an English document, and then copy it to a French
document, the language of the text should remain English (there are
exceptions if for example you copy source code).
You're right we
On 27-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> And it should probably not be output in the .lyx file. Probably a few
> changes in lyxfont.C will be enough.
It HAS to be outputed, BUT as the document_wide language, otherwise we're
not able to switch back and remain in the previously defined
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 12:03:04PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 27-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > And it should probably not be output in the .lyx file. Probably a few
> > changes in lyxfont.C will be enough.
>
> It HAS to be outputed, BUT as the document_wide language,
On 27-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Why the language in insetERT is changed to ignore_language ???
No your're right it should be inherit_language and now it is!
> The correct way for implementing insetERT is to have an InsetEditor and use
Your free to provide one!
> it instead of insetText.
On 27-Jul-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The interesting methods in LyX Font are
>
> /** Reduce font to fall back to template where possible.
> Equal fields are reduced to INHERIT */
> void reduce(LyXFont const & tmplt);
>
> /// Realize font from a template
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 02:15:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dekel> Why the language in insetERT is changed to ignore_language ???
>
> We need a way to say inherit language. This works well for everything
> in a font when one specifies ALL_INHERIT, _except_ for language. Why?
Because
On 27-Jul-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> Because the language property is not inherited.
> If you write some text in an English document, and then copy it to a French
> document, the language of the text should remain English (there are
> exceptions if for example you copy source code).
You're right
, indicating a language change.
Indeed, when I opened UG with emacs, I found that all ERT insets had a
\lang ignore directive, which Lyx complains about when opening the file,
as it is an unknown language.
I've stripped out those \lang directives in emacs, and now the file loads
fine
Juergen Vigna wrote:
I've stripped out those \lang directives in emacs, and now the file loads
fine in today's CVS. What's the deal?
This seems strange to me as it seems I changed the code in text.C so that
the font of a ignore language is not displayed as different! Ignore should
s underlined blue, indicating a language change.
> Indeed, when I opened UG with emacs, I found that all ERT insets had a
> "\lang ignore" directive, which Lyx complains about when opening the file,
> as it is an unknown language.
>
> I've stripped out those \lang direct
Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> > I've stripped out those \lang directives in emacs, and now the file loads
> > fine in today's CVS. What's the deal?
>
> This seems strange to me as it seems I changed the code in text.C so that
> the font of a "ignore" language is not displayed as different! Ignore
, when I opened UG with emacs, I found that all ERT insets had a
\lang ignore directive, which Lyx complains about when opening the file,
as it is an unknown language.
I've stripped out those \lang directives in emacs, and now the file loads
fine in today's CVS. What's the deal?
Mike
--
Mike
, when I opened UG with emacs, I found that all ERT insets had a
"\lang ignore" directive, which Lyx complains about when opening the file,
as it is an unknown language.
I've stripped out those \lang directives in emacs, and now the file loads
fine in today's CVS. What's the deal?
Mike
28 matches
Mail list logo
