Jürgen Spitzmüller j.spitzmuel...@gmx.de writes:
What was our policy in the past (i.e., your policy)? Personally, I
would be fine with this.
I think I would have accepted the new template. Concerns about new
layouts/templates being a fileformat change have always been theoretical
AFAICR, so
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What was our policy in the past (i.e., your policy)? Personally, I
would be fine with this.
I think I would have accepted the new template. Concerns about new
layouts/templates being a fileformat change have always been
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
As you say it is the same as new layouts. One argument is that users of
older lyx version can get hold of the updated external templates and
they will work in their new version. If it turned out to be a real-life
problem, we could host a page with all these
Jürgen Spitzmüller juer...@spitzmueller.org writes:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Allow Dia diagrams as external insets.
what about the branch?
I think our policy was to not introduce new External insets in branch, since
this is de facto a file format change, but I'm not absolutely sure (since the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What was our policy in the past (i.e., your policy)? Personally, I
would be fine with this.
I think I would have accepted the new template. Concerns about new
layouts/templates being a fileformat change have always been theoretical
AFAICR, so there has been no
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> What was our policy in the past (i.e., your policy)? Personally, I
> would be fine with this.
I think I would have accepted the new template. Concerns about new
layouts/templates being a fileformat change have always been theoretical
AFAICR, so
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> >> What was our policy in the past (i.e., your policy)? Personally, I
> >> would be fine with this.
> >
> > I think I would have accepted the new template. Concerns about new
> > layouts/templates being a fileformat change have always
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> As you say it is the same as new layouts. One argument is that users of
> older lyx version can get hold of the updated external templates and
> they will work in their new version. If it turned out to be a real-life
> problem, we could host a page with all these
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> > Allow Dia diagrams as external insets.
>>
>> what about the branch?
>
> I think our policy was to not introduce new External insets in branch, since
> this is de facto a file format change, but I'm not absolutely sure
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> What was our policy in the past (i.e., your policy)? Personally, I
>> would be fine with this.
>
> I think I would have accepted the new template. Concerns about new
> layouts/templates being a fileformat change have always been theoretical
> AFAICR, so there has
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Author: sanda
Date: Tue Dec 16 17:07:07 2008
New Revision: 27899
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/27899
Log:
Allow Dia diagrams as external insets.
what about the branch?
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
Allow Dia diagrams as external insets.
what about the branch?
I think our policy was to not introduce new External insets in branch, since
this is de facto a file format change, but I'm not absolutely sure (since the
same would apply to new layouts and modules).
What do
sa...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: sanda
> Date: Tue Dec 16 17:07:07 2008
> New Revision: 27899
>
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/27899
> Log:
> Allow Dia diagrams as external insets.
what about the branch?
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Allow Dia diagrams as external insets.
>
> what about the branch?
I think our policy was to not introduce new External insets in branch, since
this is de facto a file format change, but I'm not absolutely sure (since the
same would apply to new layouts and modules).
What
14 matches
Mail list logo