John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
I guess you have added the dialog for testing purposes only,
haven't you? (Please, please say yes)
John I agree to a small degree. I don't see the purpose of the dialog
And it
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
I guess you have added the dialog for testing purposes only, haven't
you? (Please, please say yes)
I agree to a small degree I don't see the purpose of the dialog
I'm the one that
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:29 pm, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
I guess you have added the dialog for testing purposes only, haven't
you? (Please, please say yes)
I agree to a small degree. I don't see the purpose of the dialog
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:09:33AM +0100, Asger K Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
Historically, we have seen that external programs crash, stop, or
so it /is/ a debugging tool
LyX is in there, I think you will see the value How many times
have you not wondered what was going on, while LaTeX was
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars | On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:09:33AM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
Historically, we have seen that external programs crash, stop, or
Lars | so it /is/ a debugging tool.
LyX is in
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, John Levon wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:09:33AM +0100, Asger K Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
Historically, we have seen that external programs crash, stop, or
so it /is/ a debugging tool
You can say that if you want to
I'd rather compare it with the emergency save
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:29 pm, John Levon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
I guess you have added the dialog for testing purposes only, haven't
you? (Please, please say yes)
I agree to a
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>> I guess you have added the dialog for testing purposes only,
>> haven't you? (Please, please say "yes")
John> I agree to a small degree. I don't see the purpose of
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> > I guess you have added the dialog for testing purposes only, haven't
> > you? (Please, please say "yes")
>
> I agree to a small degree. I don't see the purpose of the dialog
I'm the
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:29 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> > I guess you have added the dialog for testing purposes only, haven't
> > you? (Please, please say "yes")
>
> I agree to a small degree. I don't see the purpose of
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:09:33AM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> Historically, we have seen that external programs crash, stop, or
so it /is/ a debugging tool.
> LyX is in there, I think you will see the value. How many times
> have you not wondered what was going on, while LaTeX
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:09:33AM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>>
>>> Historically, we have seen that external programs crash, stop, or
>>
Lars> | so it /is/ a
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:09:33AM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>
> > Historically, we have seen that external programs crash, stop, or
>
> so it /is/ a debugging tool.
You can say that if you want to.
I'd rather compare it with the emergency
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:29 pm, John Levon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> >
> > > I guess you have added the dialog for testing purposes only, haven't
> > > you? (Please, please say "yes")
> >
> >
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
I guess you have added the dialog for testing purposes only, haven't
you? (Please, please say yes)
I agree to a small degree. I don't see the purpose of the dialog
john
--
This is just the kind of crackpot scheme I've been
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:33:48PM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> I guess you have added the dialog for testing purposes only, haven't
> you? (Please, please say "yes")
I agree to a small degree. I don't see the purpose of the dialog
john
--
"This is just the kind of crackpot scheme I've
16 matches
Mail list logo
