On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 05:06:43PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 23.11.2021 um 21:35 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I think I found another instance of this issue. To reproduce, open
> > the attached file and do spellcheck. "abcxyz" is misspelled, but if
> > you click on "
Am Dienstag, dem 23.11.2021 um 21:35 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I think I found another instance of this issue. To reproduce, open
> the attached file and do spellcheck. "abcxyz" is misspelled, but if
> you click on "ignore all" it goes to the next instance of that word.
>
> I think the issu
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 09:40:21AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 03:20:05PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 16:04 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > I've just tested it and it is working well. I will enjoy using this
> > > feature fo
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 03:20:05PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 16:04 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I've just tested it and it is working well. I will enjoy using this
> > feature for my personal use. A few comments, although I understand if
> > you don't
Am Donnerstag, dem 19.08.2021 um 16:04 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I've just tested it and it is working well. I will enjoy using this
> feature for my personal use. A few comments, although I understand if
> you don't have time these days:
Yes, and I fear this will be true for quite a while.
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 12:25:49PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 05:54:27PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 06/03/2021 à 16:52, Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
> > > commit 07396ab2445720b21dc8195816eb1aee1f2ae3a7
> > > Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> > > Date:
Am 08.03.2021 um 19:39 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>
> Am 08.03.2021 um 19:22 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>>
>> Am 08.03.2021 um 14:32 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:14:12PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Are you sure you did not errorneously flagged one of bisect steps wrongly
Am 08.03.2021 um 19:22 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>
> Am 08.03.2021 um 14:32 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:14:12PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
Are you sure you did not errorneously flagged one of bisect steps wrongly?
>>>
>>> My HEAD is ahead of origin by 4 commits (incl
Am 08.03.2021 um 14:32 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:14:12PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> Are you sure you did not errorneously flagged one of bisect steps wrongly?
>>
>> My HEAD is ahead of origin by 4 commits (including the manual reversion -
>> diff attached).
>
> 07
Am Mo., 8. März 2021 um 14:34 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> So "Ignore all" has now different schematics?
>
Yes, "Ignore" and "Ignore All" have changed semantics, as the ignorance
will now persist beyind session.
"Skip" is old "Ignore" (just skip this match without actually ignoring it),
"Skip All
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 02:13:21PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 08.03.2021 um 12:18 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> >> commit 07396ab2445720b21dc8195816eb1aee1f2ae3a7
> >> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> >> Date: Sat Mar 6
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 01:14:12PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Are you sure you did not errorneously flagged one of bisect steps wrongly?
>
> My HEAD is ahead of origin by 4 commits (including the manual reversion -
> diff attached).
07122f066b43 and your reversion is not identical - I see se
Am 08.03.2021 um 12:18 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> commit 07396ab2445720b21dc8195816eb1aee1f2ae3a7
>> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
>> Date: Sat Mar 6 16:53:33 2021 +0100
>>
>>Meet per-document spelling dictionaries (fix
Am 08.03.2021 um 12:14 schrieb Pavel Sanda :
>
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:14:13AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Am 08.03.2021 um 07:27 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>>>
>>> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 20:55 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
To reproduce I
1. Open the Help -> Intro.
>
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 04:52:12PM +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> commit 07396ab2445720b21dc8195816eb1aee1f2ae3a7
> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> Date: Sat Mar 6 16:53:33 2021 +0100
>
> Meet per-document spelling dictionaries (fixes #86 [sic!])
Is this option supposed to pop up at t
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:14:13AM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 08.03.2021 um 07:27 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> >
> > Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 20:55 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> >> To reproduce I
> >>
> >> 1. Open the Help -> Intro.
> >> 2. Boom.
> >
> > Is it related to the darkmode
Am 08.03.2021 um 07:27 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 20:55 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> To reproduce I
>>
>> 1. Open the Help -> Intro.
>> 2. Boom.
>
> Is it related to the darkmode runtime switch we recently added? You
> backtrace points towards that code regi
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 20:55 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> To reproduce I
>
> 1. Open the Help -> Intro.
> 2. Boom.
Is it related to the darkmode runtime switch we recently added? You
backtrace points towards that code region.
In any case, you can try bisecting.
Jürgen
signature.asc
D
Am 07.03.2021 um 20:08 schrieb Stephan Witt :
>
>> Am 07.03.2021 um 19:09 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>>
>> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 18:58 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>>> From the dictionary.
>>
>> Thanks. Cannot reproduce. Can you try to dig in deeper?
>
> How? The exception comes from „
> Am 07.03.2021 um 19:09 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 18:58 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> From the dictionary.
>
> Thanks. Cannot reproduce. Can you try to dig in deeper?
How? The exception comes from „outer space“ …
This is the program output:
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 18:58 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> From the dictionary.
Thanks. Cannot reproduce. Can you try to dig in deeper?
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailm
Am 07.03.2021 um 18:50 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 18:48 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> To reproduce I do:
>>
>> 1. Open the attached document.
>> 2. Remove the second unrrund.
>> 3. Navigate and type some text. Boom.
>
> What do you mean by "remove"? Remove fr
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 18:48 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> To reproduce I do:
>
> 1. Open the attached document.
> 2. Remove the second unrrund.
> 3. Navigate and type some text. Boom.
What do you mean by "remove"? Remove from the dictionary or delete the
word in the document?
Jürgen
s
Am 07.03.2021 um 18:24 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:55 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
>> But I'll implement another lfun along this way.
>
> Done.
>
> Jürgen
Thanks.
Is this crash related? Hard to say…
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thre
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:55 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> But I'll implement another lfun along this way.
Done.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-d
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:56 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Or add it to LFUN_SPELLING_REMOVE implementation?
I would rather keep the diverse dictionaries separated.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.o
Am 07.03.2021 um 17:55 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:47 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> Yes, there is LFUN_SPELLING_REMOVE already.
>
> I find this rather odd, as you have to know a word is in the dictionary
> in order to remove it.
>
> But I'll implement anoth
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:47 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Yes, there is LFUN_SPELLING_REMOVE already.
I find this rather odd, as you have to know a word is in the dictionary
in order to remove it.
But I'll implement another lfun along this way.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This i
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:51 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> > It did not come yet AFAIR.
>
> Yes, it was not announced yet.
So we are not in feature freeze.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http:
Am 07.03.2021 um 17:36 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:32 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>>> Are we? I must have missed the announcement. Can you point me to
>>> it?
>>
>> https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Meeting2021-01-11
>
> This only says "A feature and format freeze
Am 07.03.2021 um 17:24 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 16:53 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> No I don’t want to enhance it *now*. We are in feature-freeze IMO.
>
> Are we? I must have missed the announcement. Can you point me to it?
>
> (I agree that we should enter
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 17:32 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> > Are we? I must have missed the announcement. Can you point me to
> > it?
>
> https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Meeting2021-01-11
This only says "A feature and format freeze is coming soon."
It did not come yet AFAIR.
Jürgen
signatu
Am 07.03.2021 um 17:24 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 16:53 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> No I don’t want to enhance it *now*. We are in feature-freeze IMO.
>
> Are we? I must have missed the announcement. Can you point me to it?
https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Meetin
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 16:53 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> No I don’t want to enhance it *now*. We are in feature-freeze IMO.
Are we? I must have missed the announcement. Can you point me to it?
(I agree that we should enter feature freeze soon, though).
> > > > >
> > I see. Can you try
Am 07.03.2021 um 14:36 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 14:04 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>>> I can't follow you here. Sure it is.
>>
>> IMO it is a new feature.
>
> Where did I claim it isn't?
>
> If you want to enhance it: be invited.
No I don’t want to enhance
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 14:04 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> > I can't follow you here. Sure it is.
>
> IMO it is a new feature.
Where did I claim it isn't?
If you want to enhance it: be invited.
> > > > Also, as you say it is marked correctly after context menu
> > > > action,
> > > > the
Am 07.03.2021 um 13:54 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 13:45 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> I see more than one problem.
>>
>> 1. The spell checker on Mac is an OS service and there is support for
>> document scope too. Probably this collides with our implementation
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 13:45 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> I see more than one problem.
>
> 1. The spell checker on Mac is an OS service and there is support for
> document scope too. Probably this collides with our implementation in
> LyX.
Why is this a problem? The implementation I have
Am 07.03.2021 um 13:36 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 13:24 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> The first document has „unrrund“ in local dictionary and therefore it
>> shouldn’t
>> marked as mis-spelled. On Mac the spellchecker doesn’t check words -
>> it checks
>> para
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 13:24 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> The first document has „unrrund“ in local dictionary and therefore it
> shouldn’t
> marked as mis-spelled. On Mac the spellchecker doesn’t check words -
> it checks
> paragraphs and so it misses the entries in local dictionary.
>
>
Am 07.03.2021 um 12:35 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 11:24 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> On Mac it doesn’t work well.
>>
>> 1. Mark a word as ignored per-document.
>> 2. Save it.
>> 3. Close it.
>> 4. Reopen it.
>> 5. The ignored word is misspelled.
>> 6. Open co
Am Sonntag, dem 07.03.2021 um 11:24 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> On Mac it doesn’t work well.
>
> 1. Mark a word as ignored per-document.
> 2. Save it.
> 3. Close it.
> 4. Reopen it.
> 5. The ignored word is misspelled.
> 6. Open context-menu w/o doing any action and close it.
> 7. Word is not mi
Am 06.03.2021 um 18:25 schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
>
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 05:54:27PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 06/03/2021 à 16:52, Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
>>> commit 07396ab2445720b21dc8195816eb1aee1f2ae3a7
>>> Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
>>> Date: Sat Mar 6 16:53:33 2
Le 06/03/2021 à 21:06, José Abílio Matos a écrit :
On Saturday, March 6, 2021 5:52:53 PM WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Don't tempt me. Or a flutter frontend?
JMarc
I suggest instead a probably less known toolkit: xforms. It is a small code
base but the mailing list is still active, the last
On Saturday, March 6, 2021 5:52:53 PM WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Don't tempt me. Or a flutter frontend?
>
> JMarc
I suggest instead a probably less known toolkit: xforms. It is a small code
base but the mailing list is still active, the last messages are from last
December. :-D
--
José
Le 06/03/2021 à 18:25, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
You are cheating here. Only #88 is available.
If you want, we can reopen 1 and you can add a gtk 4.0 frontend to fix it?
Don't tempt me. Or a flutter frontend?
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailma
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 05:54:27PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 06/03/2021 à 16:52, Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
> > commit 07396ab2445720b21dc8195816eb1aee1f2ae3a7
> > Author: Juergen Spitzmueller
> > Date: Sat Mar 6 16:53:33 2021 +0100
> >
> > Meet per-document spelling dict
47 matches
Mail list logo