Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

2016-01-30 Thread Georg Baum
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 29.01.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Georg Baum: > >> Does anybody give a +1 subsequently for the ACM layout update? If yes, we >> should update the version numbers of the tex2lyx tests. If not, I propose >> that Uwe reverts the layout file changes and makes the 504-505 step an >>

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

2016-01-29 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 29.01.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Georg Baum: So what are we going to do now? The tex2lyx tests are currently failing because of wrong versions (I guess because Guillaume did resolve them with git and did not regenerate them after merging his patches with the ACM layout update). I don't

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

2016-01-29 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 30.01.2016 um 02:11 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: I propose that Uwe reverts the layout file changes and makes the 504-505 step an empty conversion. Why? So we want to ship a layout for ACM that nobody can use? So in fact you are proposing to revert a valid fix the re-enable a feature of LyX. Your

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

2016-01-29 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:32:23PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:11:09AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> > >> Am I mistaken or nobody gave Uwe the +1 to do this format increment? > > > > As discussed in the other thread, you are correct. >

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

2016-01-29 Thread Georg Baum
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:11:09AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: >> >> Am I mistaken or nobody gave Uwe the +1 to do this format increment? > > As discussed in the other thread, you are correct. So what are we going to do now? The tex2lyx tests are currently failing

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

2016-01-27 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 08:11:09AM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 27/01/2016 01:58, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : > >commit c1e0b24304e67ede19f30c2ee7498386bfcf6808 > >Author: Uwe Stöhr > >Date: Wed Jan 27 01:58:13 2016 +0100 > > > > acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

2016-01-27 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 27/01/2016 01:58, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : @@ -2239,10 +2343,12 @@ convert = [ [501, [convert_fontsettings]], [502, []], [503, []], - [504, [convert_save_props]] + [504, [convert_save_props]], + [505, [convert_ACM_siggraph]]

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

2016-01-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 27.01.2016 um 18:49 schrieb Guillaume Munch: Uwe, I am worried about this duplicate application of revert_save_props. Thanks, I fixed this now. Please, apply the doc updates in a separate commit because they prevent us from reading the commit log and spotting such errors. OK. regards

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

2016-01-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 27.01.2016 um 08:11 schrieb Guillaume Munch: Am I mistaken or nobody gave Uwe the +1 to do this format increment? Scott reported it worked for him and I interpreted it ;-) Yesterday I had updated my series of patches on tabular-feature from format 504 to 505, going again carefully

Re: [LyX/master] acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92

2016-01-26 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 27/01/2016 01:58, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : commit c1e0b24304e67ede19f30c2ee7498386bfcf6808 Author: Uwe Stöhr Date: Wed Jan 27 01:58:13 2016 +0100 acmsiggraph.layout: update layout for ACM siggraph 0.92 fileformat change: update fileformat for all files diff --git