On 7/06/2016 7:31 a.m., Pavel Sanda wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
So, am I supposed to do something?
I'd say if you know few liner patch, then fix it.
If it needs lot of work it might not be worth the effort,
these lfuns might be used by devs but never users
so it depends who are we targetin
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> So, am I supposed to do something?
I'd say if you know few liner patch, then fix it.
If it needs lot of work it might not be worth the effort,
these lfuns might be used by devs but never users
so it depends who are we targeting by lfuns.lyx.
Pavel
Am Montag, den 06.06.2016, 09:53 -0700 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > No, this was not intentional. Thanks for fixing.
>
> Hehe, no I did not fix it ;)
So, am I supposed to do something?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I don't know whether it was your intention, but it seems that part of
> > Hidden lfuns is no more generated correctly and some lfuns are missing
> > (most probably due to the fact they don't have Syntax line).
>
> No, this was not intentional. Thanks for fixing.
Hehe
Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2016, 00:33 -0700 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Hi Juergen,
>
> I don't know whether it was your intention, but it seems that part of
> Hidden
> lfuns is no more generated correctly and some lfuns are missing (most
> probably
> due to the fact they don't have Syntax line).
No, thi
avel Sanda wrote:
> commit b356df7fcf8b1970a1767138d0fa287114b6cea3
> Author: Pavel Sanda
> Date: Wed Jun 1 00:20:50 2016 -0700
>
> glitch in lfundoc
Hi Juergen,
I don't know whether it was your intention, but it seems that part of Hidden
lfuns is no more generated correctly and some lfun
