On Tuesday 17 July 2007 19:00:37 Bo Peng wrote:
Jose:
The test case of bug 3404 has multiple consecutive
\begin_deeper
\begin_deeper
\end_deeper
\end_deeper
and an \end_layout is inserted before each \begin_deeper. This leads
to excessive \end_layout.
I am *not* familiar with lyx
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 19:00:37 Bo Peng wrote:
I am *not* familiar with lyx 1.3.x format and I do not know if there
are valid cases where multiple \begin_deeper should yield multiple
\end_layout. If you know the answer, the attached patch fixes bug
3404.
Cheers,
Bo
Committed thanks. :-)
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 19:00:37 Bo Peng wrote:
> Jose:
>
> The test case of bug 3404 has multiple consecutive
>
> \begin_deeper
> \begin_deeper
>
> \end_deeper
> \end_deeper
>
> and an \end_layout is inserted before each \begin_deeper. This leads
> to excessive \end_layout.
>
> I am *not*
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 19:00:37 Bo Peng wrote:
> I am *not* familiar with lyx 1.3.x format and I do not know if there
> are valid cases where multiple \begin_deeper should yield multiple
> \end_layout. If you know the answer, the attached patch fixes bug
> 3404.
>
> Cheers,
> Bo
Committed
Jose:
The test case of bug 3404 has multiple consecutive
\begin_deeper
\begin_deeper
\end_deeper
\end_deeper
and an \end_layout is inserted before each \begin_deeper. This leads
to excessive \end_layout.
I am *not* familiar with lyx 1.3.x format and I do not know if there
are valid cases
Jose:
The test case of bug 3404 has multiple consecutive
\begin_deeper
\begin_deeper
\end_deeper
\end_deeper
and an \end_layout is inserted before each \begin_deeper. This leads
to excessive \end_layout.
I am *not* familiar with lyx 1.3.x format and I do not know if there
are valid cases
