On Wednesday 10 October 2007 18:24:55 Edwin Leuven wrote:
that's why we need a proper ui interface to load packages and set their
options
IMHO that is not lyx job's.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 18:24:55 Edwin Leuven wrote:
> that's why we need a proper ui interface to load packages and set their
> options
IMHO that is not lyx job's.
--
José Abílio
maybe i am misguided, but i must say that this feature smells like bloat to
me.
if i understand i well, it is basically used to have shortcuts in the docs and
more easily generate latexfeatures.lyx
1. to document the shortcuts it would be enough to write see
Tools-Preferences-Shortcuts. time
Leuven, E. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. to document the shortcuts it would be enough to write see
Tools-Preferences-Shortcuts. time would be better spend
implementing this.
No. Having a documentation that is kept up to date when the lazy
developers change something without touching the
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
No. Having a documentation that is kept up to date when the lazy
developers change something without touching the documentation is
good. Note also that people who use mac or emacs bindings will
appreciate to see the right bindings. A documentation that only says
Leuven, E. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
No. Having a documentation that is kept up to date when the lazy
developers change something without touching the documentation is
good. Note also that people who use mac or emacs bindings will
appreciate to see the right
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
And when the documentation is printed?
no, and so what? as long as we have documented where to find the info, and as
long as it is easily accessible
we can then simply add a shortcut in the help menu that shows this log file
in the same way we show the latex log
Leuven, E. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
And when the documentation is printed?
no, and so what? as long as we have documented where to find the
info, and as long as it is easily accessible
I think this discussion is becoming irrational. Instead of answering
that
i not upset, and i think that i am the one being rational here
Shortcuts.lyx would be the first, and may be the last lyx document I
would print, and put next to my screen when I use lyx.
Cheers,
Bo
I am not sure why you feel so upset about this feature.
i not upset, and i think that i am the one being rational here
regards, ed.
PS and no, i won't start signing my mails with napoleon ;-)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Leuven, E. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
well what is the point of latexfeatures.lyx? first nobody looks at
this.
If you prove this you might have a point. IF.
I am not everybody but I've never ever had a look at this file. But I am
not a LateX expert. But, as
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i not upset, and i think that i am the one being rational here
Shortcuts.lyx would be the first, and may be the last lyx document I
would print, and put next to my screen when I use lyx.
In this case, it should be a tightly packed cheat-sheet (is that the
I am not everybody but I've never ever had a look at this file. But I am
not a LateX expert. But, as Edwin asked, if I was a LateX expert would I
need this file?
If we are going to keep this file around, InsetInfo simplies the
handling of it. Right now, latex chktex will generate a sed file so
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 16:17:50 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I am not everybody but I've never ever had a look at this file. But I am
not a LateX expert. But, as Edwin asked, if I was a LateX expert would I
need this file?
Just because you are a latex expert does not mean that you don't
Bo Peng wrote:
i not upset, and i think that i am the one being rational here
Shortcuts.lyx would be the first, and may be the last lyx document I
would print, and put next to my screen when I use lyx.
I agree that this file have some benefits for someone wanting to learn
by hart the
José Matos wrote:
Just because you are a latex expert does not mean that you don't want to
know what are the packages that lyx depends on without looking directly to
the source, or am I missing any detail here? :-)
that's why we need a proper ui interface to load packages and set their
maybe i am misguided, but i must say that this "feature" smells like bloat to
me.
if i understand i well, it is basically used to have shortcuts in the docs and
more easily generate latexfeatures.lyx
1. to document the shortcuts it would be enough to write "see
Tools->Preferences->Shortcuts".
"Leuven, E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. to document the shortcuts it would be enough to write "see
> Tools->Preferences->Shortcuts". time would be better spend
> implementing this.
No. Having a documentation that is kept up to date when the lazy
developers change something without touching
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> No. Having a documentation that is kept up to date when the lazy
> developers change something without touching the documentation is
> good. Note also that people who use mac or emacs bindings will
> appreciate to see the right bindings. A documentation that only
"Leuven, E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> No. Having a documentation that is kept up to date when the lazy
>> developers change something without touching the documentation is
>> good. Note also that people who use mac or emacs bindings will
>> appreciate to see
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> And when the documentation is printed?
no, and so what? as long as we have documented where to find the info, and as
long as it is easily accessible
>> we can then simply add a shortcut in the help menu that shows this log file
>> in the same way we show the latex
"Leuven, E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> And when the documentation is printed?
>
> no, and so what? as long as we have documented where to find the
> info, and as long as it is easily accessible
I think this discussion is becoming irrational. Instead of
> i not upset, and i think that i am the one being rational here
Shortcuts.lyx would be the first, and may be the last lyx document I
would print, and put next to my screen when I use lyx.
Cheers,
Bo
> I am not sure why you feel so upset about this feature.
i not upset, and i think that i am the one being rational here
regards, ed.
PS and no, i won't start signing my mails with "napoleon" ;-)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Leuven, E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
well what is the point of latexfeatures.lyx? first nobody looks at
this.
If you prove this you might have a point. IF.
I am not everybody but I've never ever had a look at this file. But I am
not a LateX expert. But, as
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> i not upset, and i think that i am the one being rational here
>
> Shortcuts.lyx would be the first, and may be the last lyx document I
> would print, and put next to my screen when I use lyx.
In this case, it should be a tightly packed cheat-sheet (is
> I am not everybody but I've never ever had a look at this file. But I am
> not a LateX expert. But, as Edwin asked, if I was a LateX expert would I
> need this file?
If we are going to keep this file around, InsetInfo simplies the
handling of it. Right now, latex chktex will generate a sed file
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 16:17:50 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I am not everybody but I've never ever had a look at this file. But I am
> not a LateX expert. But, as Edwin asked, if I was a LateX expert would I
> need this file?
Just because you are a latex expert does not mean that you don't
Bo Peng wrote:
i not upset, and i think that i am the one being rational here
Shortcuts.lyx would be the first, and may be the last lyx document I
would print, and put next to my screen when I use lyx.
I agree that this file have some benefits for someone wanting to learn
by hart the
José Matos wrote:
Just because you are a latex expert does not mean that you don't want to
know what are the packages that lyx depends on without looking directly to
the source, or am I missing any detail here? :-)
that's why we need a proper ui interface to load packages and set their
30 matches
Mail list logo
