Le 17/04/2016 01:03, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Le 10/01/2016 21:38, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 10/01/16 22:33, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I imagine that Toc and other classes are being forward-declared in some
headers probably for the same speed reason. Toc.h is there to provide an
Le 10/01/2016 21:38, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 10/01/16 22:33, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I imagine that Toc and other classes are being forward-declared in some
headers probably for the same speed reason. Toc.h is there to provide an
alternative to the forward declarations without
Le 08/01/2016 22:39, Georg Baum a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
The following patch fixes compilation for me with clang and libc++ (with
autotools I set CXX="clang++ --stdlib=libc++").
This is a workaround to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24137
to be fixed in 3.7.1 or 3.8.0.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 10/01/16 22:17, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
>> Since you have gotten a +1 from somebody else, sure. I was not so sure
>> myself, so I wanted to offer an alternative that was sure to be safe. I
>> think this will have to be done nevertheless, so I am going to keep it
Le 08/01/16 22:50, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I tried to look it up. It might work right now but I think we should
get rid of this subclassing entirely. It is just used for
forward-declaration and defining helper functions. I have a bad feeling
about starting to define custom constructors for STL
Le 10/01/2016 20:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 08/01/16 22:50, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I tried to look it up. It might work right now but I think we should
get rid of this subclassing entirely. It is just used for
forward-declaration and defining helper functions. I have a bad feeling
Le 10/01/16 22:17, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Since you have gotten a +1 from somebody else, sure. I was not so sure
myself, so I wanted to offer an alternative that was sure to be safe. I
think this will have to be done nevertheless, so I am going to keep it
for later.
Indeed Georg's comment
Le 10/01/2016 21:26, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Le 10/01/16 22:17, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
Since you have gotten a +1 from somebody else, sure. I was not so sure
myself, so I wanted to offer an alternative that was sure to be safe. I
think this will have to be done nevertheless, so I am
Le 10/01/16 22:33, Guillaume Munch a écrit :
I imagine that Toc and other classes are being forward-declared in some
headers probably for the same speed reason. Toc.h is there to provide an
alternative to the forward declarations without sacrificing speed (or
maybe my Toc.h already includes too
The following patch fixes compilation for me with clang and libc++ (with
autotools I set CXX="clang++ --stdlib=libc++").
This is a workaround to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24137
to be fixed in 3.7.1 or 3.8.0.
Can someone confirm that adding the default constructor like that is
Le 08/01/2016 08:59, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
The following patch fixes compilation for me with clang and libc++ (with
autotools I set CXX="clang++ --stdlib=libc++").
This is a workaround to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24137
to be fixed in 3.7.1 or 3.8.0.
Can someone confirm
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The following patch fixes compilation for me with clang and libc++ (with
> autotools I set CXX="clang++ --stdlib=libc++").
>
> This is a workaround to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24137
> to be fixed in 3.7.1 or 3.8.0.
>
> Can someone confirm that adding
12 matches
Mail list logo
