Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> I wonder whether I should just commit the patch as-is, thus fixing HTML
>> output and View>HTML for 1.5.0, and do something about cleaning this
>> code up more generally after 1.5.0 is out. My thought is just that
>> changing how convert() works mor
Richard Heck wrote:
Georg Baum wrote:
Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2007 18:45 schrieb Richard Heck:
So resultdir should be set if and only if the
converter creates a directory by itself. Please make sure that this does
work in combination with usetempdir, or make these two flags mutually
exclusive
Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2007 18:45 schrieb Richard Heck:
>
> So resultdir should be set if and only if the
> converter creates a directory by itself. Please make sure that this does
> work in combination with usetempdir, or make these two flags mutually
> exclusive (since uset
Am Samstag, 19. Mai 2007 18:45 schrieb Richard Heck:
> Georg Baum wrote:
> > A flag for the name of that directory does already exist: resultdir.
Please
> > use that instead of /path/file.html.conversion/.
> >
> I could be wrong, but this seems to do something else.
> /path/file.html.conversio
Georg Baum wrote:
>>> So, if you open
>>> /path/file.lyx and File>Export>Format, you will get a directory
>>> /path/file.format.conversion/ in which all the files generated by the
>>> converter will be found (e.g. the mess that htlatex generates ends up
>>> in/path/file.html.conversion/).
>>>
Thanks, Georg, for the comments. I'll take these into account and
re-work the code a bit. If you can point me towards the resultfile flag
in your playground, I'll have a look at that, too, though perhaps not
immediately, as there are more pressing bugs to fix before 1.5.rc1.
Richard
Georg Baum w
Am Freitag, 18. Mai 2007 21:14 schrieb José Matos:
> On Friday 18 May 2007 7:42:56 pm Richard Heck wrote:
> > The attached patch addresses these bugs, all of which have to do with
> > export, viewing, and the like---ultimately, with the conversion
> > routines. The patch introduces a new conversio
Richard Heck wrote:
> > This area looks a mess and I have never quite understood it completely.
> > :-) That is I why I am asking for Georg's help to decide on this. The
> > same applies to Jürgen.
>
> I'll wait for them to look at it.
It looks o.k. to me, but I'm not too deep into the converte
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 18 May 2007 7:42:56 pm Richard Heck wrote:
>
>> Any comments on this? Anyone care to test it? If you like Export>HTML or
>> View>HTML, you are going to like this
>>
> I did not forgot it, I was thinking. I am slow at times. ;-)
>
No problem. I know you
On Friday 18 May 2007 7:42:56 pm Richard Heck wrote:
> Any comments on this? Anyone care to test it? If you like Export>HTML or
> View>HTML, you are going to like this
I did not forgot it, I was thinking. I am slow at times. ;-)
>
>
> The attached patch addresses these bugs, all of whi
Any comments on this? Anyone care to test it? If you like Export>HTML or
View>HTML, you are going to like this
The attached patch addresses these bugs, all of which have to do with
export, viewing, and the like---ultimately, with the conversion
routines. The patch introduces a new co
11 matches
Mail list logo
