Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Understanding the lyx2lyx logic requires a fair amount of
Martin doublethink. Actually Georg understands this stuff much better
Martin than I and the good news is he agreed with my analysis (and
Martin offered proof)
So what is the
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 09:57 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Martin Understanding the lyx2lyx logic requires a fair amount of
Martin doublethink. Actually Georg understands this stuff much better
Martin than I and the good news is he
Martin == Martin Vermeer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So what is the outcome of the discussion? What are the patches
that would be relevant to 1.4?
Martin Oops... I seem to have neglected to post a committed mail.
Martin Here is: committed to trunk and 1.4.x, revisions 13697 and
Martin 13698.
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Understanding the lyx2lyx logic requires a fair amount of
Martin> doublethink. Actually Georg understands this stuff much better
Martin> than I and the good news is he agreed with my analysis (and
Martin> offered proof)
So what
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 09:57 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Understanding the lyx2lyx logic requires a fair amount of
> Martin> doublethink. Actually Georg understands this stuff much better
> Martin> than I and the
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So what is the outcome of the discussion? What are the patches
>> that would be relevant to 1.4?
Martin> Oops... I seem to have neglected to post a "committed" mail.
Martin> Here is: committed to trunk and 1.4.x, revisions 13697
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:28:51PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I don't agree. You're right in that the only place where a
_correspondence_ is defined between the old numerical parameters and the
new character ones is, precisely, lyx2lyx.
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:42:53PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:28:51PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I don't agree. You're right in that the only place where a
_correspondence_ is defined between the old
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:28:51PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I don't agree. You're right in that the only place where a
_correspondence_ is defined between the old numerical parameters and the
new character ones is, precisely, lyx2lyx.
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 06:42:53PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:28:51PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >I don't agree. You're right in that the only place where a
> >_correspondence_ is defined
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:28:51PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
Top Middle and Middle Middle. For this file, it works to change
inner_pos = [c,t,b,s]
to inner_pos = [t,c,b,s]. This changes the title settins to
Middle Top, but still gives a correct ps output. So
Garst R. Reese wrote:
I think the old order was a bug and this is a good time to squelch it.
in development/FORMAT lines 260-284 you have an Ovalbox and on line 269
you use tcbs for it's inner_pos. But on line 289 you use c/t/b/s for the
Frameless box.
Note that the order tcbs in the FORMAT
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 10:28:51PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
> >>Top Middle and Middle Middle. For this file, it works to change
> >>inner_pos = ["c","t","b","s"]
> >>to inner_pos = ["t","c","b","s"]. This changes the title settins to
> >>Middle Top, but still
Garst R. Reese wrote:
> I think the old order was a bug and this is a good time to squelch it.
> in development/FORMAT lines 260-284 you have an Ovalbox and on line 269
> you use tcbs for it's inner_pos. But on line 289 you use c/t/b/s for the
> Frameless box.
Note that the order tcbs in the
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:01:51AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
Try the attached.
Jose, Georg? Does this look sound to you?
- Martin
pgpLMDbsyFBdr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 20 April 2006 07:57, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:01:51AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
Try the attached.
Jose, Georg? Does this look sound to you?
The code does what you say it does.
Martin Vermeer wrote:
Jose, Georg? Does this look sound to you?
I have no time to test it right now, but the code looks good and your
explanation makes sense.
What we can learn from this is that the original minipage implementor (and
also me when I wrote the conversion function) did not think
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:20:37AM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
On Thursday 20 April 2006 07:57, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:01:51AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
Try the attached.
Jose, Georg?
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 06:02:33PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
...
Try the attached.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:01:51AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
> Try the attached.
Jose, Georg? Does this look sound to you?
- Martin
pgpLMDbsyFBdr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 20 April 2006 07:57, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:01:51AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Try the attached.
>
> Jose, Georg? Does this look sound to you?
The code does what you say
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Jose, Georg? Does this look sound to you?
I have no time to test it right now, but the code looks good and your
explanation makes sense.
What we can learn from this is that the original minipage implementor (and
also me when I wrote the conversion function) did not think
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 08:20:37AM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> On Thursday 20 April 2006 07:57, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 12:01:51AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Try the attached.
>
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 06:02:33PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
...
Try the attached.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
I have done some experimenting changing the .lyx file. To reproduce the
1.3.7 results, the Box Framless insets for the critters have position
t and inner_pos t
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
I have done some experimenting changing the .lyx file. To reproduce the
1.3.7 results, the Box Framless insets for the critters have
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 06:02:33PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
...
Try the attached.
- Martin
Oops, hit reply instead of reply
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> > I have done some experimenting changing the .lyx file. To reproduce the
> > 1.3.7 results, the Box Framless insets for the critters have position
> > "t" and
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
I have done some experimenting changing the .lyx file. To reproduce the
1.3.7 results, the Box Framless insets for the critters have
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 06:02:33PM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 08:57:53PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Garst R. Reese wrote:
...
> >Try the attached.
> >
> >- Martin
> >
> Oops, hit
30 matches
Mail list logo
