John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Here's an update. I added a couple of comments this time.
John OptSubMenu isn't too useful yet because something is going awry
John in the getStatus() stuff (perhaps mathed lfuns ?).
It is because math matrices and tabulars share the same
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:26:26PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
John OptSubMenu isn't too useful yet because something is going awry
John in the getStatus() stuff (perhaps mathed lfuns ?).
It is because math matrices and tabulars share the same lfun. I
thought you threatened to
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Here's an update. I added a couple of comments this time.
John> OptSubMenu isn't too useful yet because something is going awry
John> in the getStatus() stuff (perhaps mathed lfuns ?).
It is because math matrices and tabulars share
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 03:26:26PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> OptSubMenu isn't too useful yet because something is going awry
> John> in the getStatus() stuff (perhaps mathed lfuns ?).
>
> It is because math matrices and tabulars share the same lfun. I
> thought you threatened
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John Here's an update. I added a couple of comments this time.
I like it. It will rwquire a lot of docs updates, though.
John OptSubMenu isn't too useful yet because something is going awry
John in the getStatus() stuff (perhaps mathed lfuns ?).
I
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:24:34PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
John Here's an update. I added a couple of comments this time.
I like it. It will rwquire a lot of docs updates, though.
I am prepared to do this grunt work. If only to show off change tracking :)
John We also need
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John We also need getStatus for increase/decrease depth etc.
Jean-Marc Should be easy.
I probably have to retract this statement. the incDepth/decDepth code
is ugly.
JMarc
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should be easy.
John Perhaps you have some idea how. My 3-minute look didn't help me.
No, I have no idea anymore :(
John The problems we need to solve :
John 1) Toolbars. We've seen a little discussion on how to proceed
John here, I wonder if I
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:48:56PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
1/ name toobars, like menubars are named. For example, we would have a
literate_programming toolbar.
Yes.
2/ Any toolbar can be on/off/auto (this is in qt land, not backend);
if it is auto, show the toolbar only if at
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tend to think it is the best solution. Note that it could be
edit-properties tabular, where edit-properties searches the
nearest inset with name tabular around. This means there will not
be much lfun duplication.
John Ah ok. So getStatus() has
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:09:23PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
If only getStatus was not implemented as a big ugly switch, it would
be great stuff...
getStatus should get locallized as localDispatch is...
This is not hard in theory but probably will take a while to get right...
Andre'
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
John == John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I tend to think it is the best solution. Note that it could be
edit-properties tabular, where edit-properties searches the
nearest inset with name tabular around. This means there will not
be much lfun duplication.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:19:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Could we not have a heirarchy of FuncRequest-derived classes as a one
to one replacement for each LFUN?
And dispatch on those how?
What would that buy us?
[The main problem _I_ have with current dispatch is the limited scope of
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> Here's an update. I added a couple of comments this time.
I like it. It will rwquire a lot of docs updates, though.
John> OptSubMenu isn't too useful yet because something is going awry
John> in the getStatus() stuff (perhaps mathed
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:24:34PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> John> Here's an update. I added a couple of comments this time.
>
> I like it. It will rwquire a lot of docs updates, though.
I am prepared to do this grunt work. If only to show off change tracking :)
> John> We also need
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> We also need getStatus for increase/decrease depth etc.
Jean-Marc> Should be easy.
I probably have to retract this statement. the incDepth/decDepth code
is ugly.
JMarc
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Should be easy.
John> Perhaps you have some idea how. My 3-minute look didn't help me.
No, I have no idea anymore :(
John> The problems we need to solve :
John> 1) Toolbars. We've seen a little discussion on how to proceed
John> here,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:48:56PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 1/ name toobars, like menubars are named. For example, we would have a
> "literate_programming" toolbar.
Yes.
> 2/ Any toolbar can be on/off/auto (this is in qt land, not backend);
> if it is auto, show the toolbar only if
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I tend to think it is the best solution. Note that it could be
>> "edit-properties tabular", where edit-properties searches the
>> nearest inset with name "tabular" around. This means there will not
>> be much lfun duplication.
John> Ah
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:09:23PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> If only getStatus was not implemented as a big ugly switch, it would
> be great stuff...
getStatus should get locallized as localDispatch is...
This is not hard in theory but probably will take a while to get right...
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> I tend to think it is the best solution. Note that it could be
>>> "edit-properties tabular", where edit-properties searches the
>>> nearest inset with name "tabular" around. This means there will not
>>>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:19:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Could we not have a heirarchy of FuncRequest-derived classes as a one
> to one replacement for each LFUN?
And dispatch on those how?
What would that buy us?
[The main problem _I_ have with current dispatch is the limited scope of
Here's an update. I added a couple of comments this time.
OptSubMenu isn't too useful yet because something is going awry in the
getStatus() stuff (perhaps mathed lfuns ?). We also need getStatus for
increase/decrease depth etc.
Any way, all comments gratefully received. JMarc, the
Here's an update. I added a couple of comments this time.
OptSubMenu isn't too useful yet because something is going awry in the
getStatus() stuff (perhaps mathed lfuns ?). We also need getStatus for
increase/decrease depth etc.
Any way, all comments gratefully received. JMarc, the
24 matches
Mail list logo
