Re: [patch] bug 1523 (LyX 1.3.x)

2004-10-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen No. I just looked for a solution that does not require to Juergen rewrite the whole function. Juergen Anyway, attached is the 1.4cvs-solution, backported to 1.3.x Juergen OK to apply? Yes, I think I prefer that solution. JMarc

Re: [patch] bug 1523 (LyX 1.3.x)

2004-10-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> No. I just looked for a solution that does not require to Juergen> rewrite the whole function. Juergen> Anyway, attached is the 1.4cvs-solution, backported to 1.3.x Juergen> OK to apply? Yes, I think I prefer that

[patch] bug 1523 (LyX 1.3.x)

2004-10-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1523 This bug is already fixed (properly) in 1.4. I know that the attached patch for 1.3.x is an ugly hack, but it works. Jürgen Index: src/lyxlength.C === RCS file:

Re: [patch] bug 1523 (LyX 1.3.x)

2004-10-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1523 This bug is already fixed (properly) in 1.4. I know that the attached patch for 1.3.x is an ugly hack, but it works. Jürgen Urrrggg #include iostream #include iomanip ostringstream buffer; buffer

Re: [patch] bug 1523 (LyX 1.3.x)

2004-10-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Juergen == Juergen Spitzmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1523 This bug is Juergen already fixed (properly) in 1.4. I know that the attached Juergen patch for 1.3.x is an ugly hack, but it works. Fixing this bug would be a very good idea indeed.

Re: [patch] bug 1523 (LyX 1.3.x)

2004-10-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Fixing this bug would be a very good idea indeed. What the reason why you choose this way instead of replicating 1.4.0 code? Do you think it is safer? No. I just looked for a solution that does not require to rewrite the whole function. Anyway, attached is the

[patch] bug 1523 (LyX 1.3.x)

2004-10-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1523 This bug is already fixed (properly) in 1.4. I know that the attached patch for 1.3.x is an ugly hack, but it works. Jürgen Index: src/lyxlength.C === RCS file:

Re: [patch] bug 1523 (LyX 1.3.x)

2004-10-21 Thread Angus Leeming
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1523 > > This bug is already fixed (properly) in 1.4. I know that the attached > patch for 1.3.x is an ugly hack, but it works. > > Jürgen Urrrggg #include #include ostringstream buffer; buffer <<

Re: [patch] bug 1523 (LyX 1.3.x)

2004-10-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1523 This bug is Juergen> already fixed (properly) in 1.4. I know that the attached Juergen> patch for 1.3.x is an ugly hack, but it works. Fixing this bug would be a very good

Re: [patch] bug 1523 (LyX 1.3.x)

2004-10-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Fixing this bug would be a very good idea indeed. What the reason why > you choose this way instead of replicating 1.4.0 code? Do you think > it is safer? No. I just looked for a solution that does not require to rewrite the whole function. Anyway, attached is the