Am Sonntag, den 19.08.2018, 16:08 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> On 08/19/2018 03:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Samstag, den 18.08.2018, 14:26 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly
> > Heck:
> > > Did we also remove, or are you also going to remove, the 'date'
> > > external
> > >
On 08/19/2018 03:14 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 18.08.2018, 14:26 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
>> Did we also remove, or are you also going to remove, the 'date'
>> external
>> template?
> Oh, I forgot we also have this. Yes, I propose to remove that as well.
> But this
Am Samstag, den 18.08.2018, 14:26 -0400 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> Did we also remove, or are you also going to remove, the 'date'
> external
> template?
Oh, I forgot we also have this. Yes, I propose to remove that as well.
But this will be a file format change.
Jürgen
>
> Riki
>
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> The attached patch strips date-insert (and the related rc entry and
> helper functions) from master. The function is obsoleted by the more
> flexible and powerful date info-insets.
>
> Objections?
Good move. Pavel
On 08/18/2018 10:26 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> The attached patch strips date-insert (and the related rc entry and
> helper functions) from master. The function is obsoleted by the more
> flexible and powerful date info-insets.
Fine by me.
Did we also remove, or are you also going to
Le 18 août 2018 16:26:14 GMT+02:00, "Jürgen Spitzmüller" a
écrit :
>The attached patch strips date-insert (and the related rc entry and
>helper functions) from master. The function is obsoleted by the more
>flexible and powerful date info-insets.
>
>Objections?
>Jürgen
Not from me.
JMarc
The attached patch strips date-insert (and the related rc entry and
helper functions) from master. The function is obsoleted by the more
flexible and powerful date info-insets.
Objections?
Jürgen
diff --git a/lib/RELEASE-NOTES b/lib/RELEASE-NOTES
index 2a1157eea5..9fa91e3c88 100644
---
