On Wednesday 18 July 2007 06:43:17 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José?
OK.
Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday 18 July 2007 06:43:17 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> José?
OK.
> Jürgen
--
José Abílio
This oneliner fixes some ugly drawing artefacts with insets in the appendix
(probably introduced with revision 19039).
Attached also a testcase where you can see the artefacts.
OK to apply?
Jürgen
Index: src/rowpainter.cpp
===
---
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 14:25:23 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
This oneliner fixes some ugly drawing artefacts with insets in the appendix
(probably introduced with revision 19039).
Attached also a testcase where you can see the artefacts.
OK to apply?
OK.
Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On 7/17/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This oneliner fixes some ugly drawing artefacts with insets in the appendix
(probably introduced with revision 19039).
There is also a redraw problem when you delete in ERT or listings
inset, do you also have an oneliner? :-)
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
There is also a redraw problem when you delete in ERT or listings
inset, do you also have an oneliner? :-)
No, unfortunately not.
Jürgen
Bo Peng wrote:
There is also a redraw problem when you delete in ERT or listings
inset, do you also have an oneliner? :-)
Try this (OK, a bit more than one line).
Jürgen
Index: src/rowpainter.cpp
===
--- src/rowpainter.cpp
On 7/17/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
There is also a redraw problem when you delete in ERT or listings
inset, do you also have an oneliner? :-)
Try this (OK, a bit more than one line).
The problem seems to be solved, but I can not figure out when an ERT
Bo Peng wrote:
The problem seems to be solved, but I can not figure out when an ERT
inset will occupy the rest of the line during edition. E.g.
This is the unsavoury wide() thing (TM).
The rule is: an inset spans the whole line, if
- it is the only thing in the row
and
- the cursor is inside.
So if you think that bug 3582 is solved, I'd propose to put that into 1.5.0.
It should, but you need another OK.
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
So if you think that bug 3582 is solved, I'd propose to put that into
1.5.0.
It should, but you need another OK.
OK from me.
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
It should, but you need another OK.
OK from me.
José?
Jürgen
This oneliner fixes some ugly drawing artefacts with insets in the appendix
(probably introduced with revision 19039).
Attached also a testcase where you can see the artefacts.
OK to apply?
Jürgen
Index: src/rowpainter.cpp
===
---
On Tuesday 17 July 2007 14:25:23 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> This oneliner fixes some ugly drawing artefacts with insets in the appendix
> (probably introduced with revision 19039).
>
> Attached also a testcase where you can see the artefacts.
>
> OK to apply?
OK.
> Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On 7/17/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This oneliner fixes some ugly drawing artefacts with insets in the appendix
(probably introduced with revision 19039).
There is also a redraw problem when you delete in ERT or listings
inset, do you also have an oneliner? :-)
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
> There is also a redraw problem when you delete in ERT or listings
> inset, do you also have an oneliner? :-)
No, unfortunately not.
Jürgen
Bo Peng wrote:
> There is also a redraw problem when you delete in ERT or listings
> inset, do you also have an oneliner? :-)
Try this (OK, a bit more than one line).
Jürgen
Index: src/rowpainter.cpp
===
--- src/rowpainter.cpp
On 7/17/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
> There is also a redraw problem when you delete in ERT or listings
> inset, do you also have an oneliner? :-)
Try this (OK, a bit more than one line).
The problem seems to be solved, but I can not figure out when an ERT
Bo Peng wrote:
> The problem seems to be solved, but I can not figure out when an ERT
> inset will occupy the rest of the line during edition. E.g.
This is the unsavoury "wide() thing" (TM).
The rule is: an inset spans the whole line, if
- it is the only thing in the row
and
- the cursor is
So if you think that bug 3582 is solved, I'd propose to put that into 1.5.0.
It should, but you need another OK.
Bo
Bo Peng wrote:
So if you think that bug 3582 is solved, I'd propose to put that into
1.5.0.
It should, but you need another OK.
OK from me.
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > It should, but you need another OK.
>
> OK from me.
José?
Jürgen
22 matches
Mail list logo
