Re: [patch] support for Urdu

2016-10-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 27.10.2016 um 00:12 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: I dis not have time to look at it but I guess it is actually fine if polyglossia does the work. OK, it is in now. regards Uwe

Re: [patch] support for Urdu

2016-10-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
I dis not have time to look at it but I guess it is actually fine if polyglossia does the work. JMarc Le 27 octobre 2016 00:06:30 GMT+02:00, "Uwe Stöhr" a écrit : >Am 23.10.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: > >>> Why would we have >>> lots of hardcoded tests for arabic and

Re: [patch] support for Urdu

2016-10-26 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 23.10.2016 um 16:49 schrieb Uwe Stöhr: Why would we have lots of hardcoded tests for arabic and friends but not urdu?? Did you look at each of these tests as I advised and then decided that each of them was unnecessary for Urdu? No, since I did not know that we need special tests for the

Re: [patch] support for Urdu

2016-10-23 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 23.10.2016 um 13:26 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: I do not see the code that make the LaTeX output work. One does not need special LaTeX code, that is the advantage of LuaTeX/XeTeX with polyglossia. No more nasty hacks. If one tells polyglossia that the following text is in Urdu, LuaTeX

Re: [patch] support for Urdu

2016-10-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 23/10/2016 à 04:09, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Support for Urdu was once denied because of font problems. The corresponding bug reported by an Urdu-speaking LyX user is fixed in LyX 2.2: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9066 Therefore I don't see a reason why LyX cannot support Urdu. Attached is the

[patch] support for Urdu

2016-10-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Support for Urdu was once denied because of font problems. The corresponding bug reported by an Urdu-speaking LyX user is fixed in LyX 2.2: http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9066 Therefore I don't see a reason why LyX cannot support Urdu. Attached is the patch and a LyX testfile to play with.