On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 11:24:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 20/01/2020 à 22:21, Anand Rangarajan a écrit :
> > OS: linux (opensuse leap 15.1)
> > Qt version: 5.14.0
> >
> > I compiled and ran lyx-2.3.4 with the configuration shown below. A
> > pr
Am Thu, 13 Feb 2020 14:54:42 +0100
schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 13/02/2020 à 14:44, Stephan Witt a écrit :
> > The patch I’ve posted was a workaround for elder TeX installations.
> > If we decide to require a TeX installation with footnotehyper this
> > may be reasonable but it’s not so
Le 13/02/2020 à 14:44, Stephan Witt a écrit :
The patch I’ve posted was a workaround for elder TeX installations.
If we decide to require a TeX installation with footnotehyper this
may be reasonable but it’s not so easy to see. I cannot tell what
the right answer is.
For the record I cannot
Am 07.02.2020 um 10:13 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 15:27 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> IMO it’s caused by a bad "no-break space“ character in sub-section
>> 3.9.2 Dashes and Line Breaks
>
> That's the sort of information I am trying to gather from you.
>
> In
Am Freitag, den 07.02.2020, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Do not forget the obligatory bottles of Bourgogne and Champagne.
:-)
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Le 07/02/2020 à 10:11, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 17:12 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
As non-french who would write french documents
I would
find installing all french-related stuff in one package acceptable.
That's like: You want to have some Bordeaux with your
Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 15:27 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> IMO it’s caused by a bad "no-break space“ character in sub-section
> 3.9.2 Dashes and Line Breaks
That's the sort of information I am trying to gather from you.
In any case, we have introduced footnotehyper for a reason, so it will
Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 17:12 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> As non-french who would write french documents
> I would
> find installing all french-related stuff in one package acceptable.
That's like: You want to have some Bordeaux with your dinner? OK, but
then you need to reserve the French
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 07:23:52PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> >This is what I initially thought, but no k+m+2 is still ok because we
> >check against < MAX_WD_LEN-1 not <= MAX_WD_LEN-1.
>
> I patched and recompiled, same warning as expected from the last posts.
Yes, the warning won't
Le 06/02/2020 à 18:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:16:00PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > > I looked at the code
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the
> > > reported
> > >
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the
> > reported
> > line (247) by the previous if clause.
> > What is not clear to me are two
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the
> reported
> line (247) by the previous if clause.
> What is not clear to me are two following lines, which add m+1 chars while the
> check seem to properly
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the
> reported
> line (247) by the previous if clause.
> What is not clear to me are two following lines, which add m+1 chars while the
> check seem to properly
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 06:52:29PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Le 31/01/2020 ? 20:46, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
> >Public release of LyX version 2.3.4
> >===
> >
> >We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.3.4. This i
Le 31/01/2020 à 20:46, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
Public release of LyX version 2.3.4
===
We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.3.4. This is the fourth
maintenance release in the 2.3.x series.
I got a working LyX installation where the 4 UserGuides
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 03:10:17PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > I don't have really opinion about this, knowing very little about texlive
> > packaging, I don't even understand why is all-language-related-stuff into
> > single package stupid, hence I won't be able to explain myself to
Due to bug #11728, I'm going to be doing an emergency update for Windows
either tonight or tomorrow. Just a warning.
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Am 05.02.2020 um 15:08 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 12:40 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> > Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
> > (caused by the hyperref/footnote incompatibility) if you simply omit
> > footnotehyper?
>
> Yes I
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 13:06 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> I don't have really opinion about this, knowing very little about texlive
> packaging, I don't even understand why is all-language-related-stuff into
> single package stupid, hence I won't be able to explain myself to packagers
> either :)
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 12:40 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> > Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
> (caused by the hyperref/footnote incompatibility) if you simply omit
> footnotehyper?
>
> Yes I did. I get other errors with input encodings.
>
Do this depend on
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 10:24:12AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > So instead of reporting missing dependency we would need to ask for
> > restructuring the packaging, which is I am afraid too long shot.
> >
>
> Why not? I mean, this packaging structure is plain stupid.
I don't have really
Am 05.02.2020 um 11:53 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 11:11 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> I’m no expert for these things. But a normal user wants to see the users
> guide and not errors.
>
> Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
>
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 11:11 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> I’m no expert for these things. But a normal user wants to see the users
> guide and not errors.
>
Thus I rephrase my question: Did you check that you get no other errors
(caused by the hyperref/footnote incompatibility) if you simply
Am 05.02.2020 um 10:57 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> Yes, I’m sure. Because it’s already broken for missing footnotehyper package.
>
> This does not mean that it doesn't break without footnotehyper.
>
> Rather than just omitting
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 10:53 Uhr schrieb Stephan Witt :
> Yes, I’m sure. Because it’s already broken for missing footnotehyper
> package.
This does not mean that it doesn't break without footnotehyper.
Rather than just omitting footnotehyper, it might be necessary to omit
footnote (or
Am 05.02.2020 um 07:02 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 00:32 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> Yes, but LyX can test for footnotehyper's presence with
>> isAvailable().
>> Patch attached, ok?
>
> Are you sure docs do not break with hyperref and plain footnote
>
Am 05.02.2020 um 09:15 schrieb mn :
>
> On 05.02.20 00:22, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>>> Alternatively, just try this:
>>> http://ftp.lyx.de/Documentation/en/UserGuide.pdf (2.3.3)
>>>
>>> open in Preview or Skim.
>>
>> No problem here with Preview or Skim.
>> "The LYX User’s Guide
>> by the LYX
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 10:24 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Why not? I mean, this packaging structure is plain stupid.
>
Wow. I had a look now. So everybody who needs to use French as a secondary
language (be it for one single word or quotation) needs to install all
French translations of
Am Mi., 5. Feb. 2020 um 09:45 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda :
> I checked in more detail debian and their of packaging is unf language
> based (so e.g. everything french related is in a single package worth
> of 70 mb for texlive 2019).
>
That's ridiculous. OpenSuse ships a texlive-babel-french
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 07:00:59AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I think if people would complain, those packagers might revisit their
> decisions. These are really just a few Linux distros who do this. I
> don't think we should let ourselves constrain from this really
> nonsensical decision.
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 06:56:07AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > It might be worth to report it, do we have clue whether adding all
> > other languages is heavy in terms of space (are some dictionaries
> > needed?)
>
> It's
On 05.02.20 00:22, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> Alternatively, just try this:
>> http://ftp.lyx.de/Documentation/en/UserGuide.pdf (2.3.3)
>>
>> open in Preview or Skim.
>
> No problem here with Preview or Skim.
> "The LYX User’s Guide
> by the LYX Team∗ Version 2.2.x
> April 20, 2017"
> Preview Version
Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 00:32 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Yes, but LyX can test for footnotehyper's presence with
> isAvailable().
> Patch attached, ok?
Are you sure docs do not break with hyperref and plain footnote
package?
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 23:40 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> We don't really control was various distros do, obviously. I wonder
> whether it would be worth trying to pare down the User Guide a bit,
> so
> that it was compilable with a relatively minimal LaTeX installation.
> Stuff on
Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> It might be worth to report it, do we have clue whether adding all
> other languages is heavy in terms of space (are some dictionaries
> needed?)
It's not heavy at all. Thos *.ldf files are rather short text files.
Language-specific
On 2/4/20 1:11 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 06:40:35PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 18:22 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>>> Compiling user guide doesn't work for me for quite some time
>>> due to missing packages (some french & spanish babel
Am 04.02.2020 um 18:38 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>
> Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 18:11 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
>> Is anyone able to reproduce the problems with Linux?
>
> Works for me.
>
> footnotehyper is in TeXLive and MikTeX as of 2016.
Yes, but LyX can test for footnotehyper's
Am 04.02.2020 um 20:54 schrieb mn :
>
> On 04.02.20 18:11, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
>> Anyway, the English version doesn’t work for me too.
>>
>> I'm facing a strange error:
>> ==
>> LaTeX Error: File `footnotehyper.sty' not found.
>> Enter file name:
>> ! Emergency stop.
>>
>>
>> l.36
On 04.02.20 18:11, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Anyway, the English version doesn’t work for me too.
>
> I'm facing a strange error:
> ==
> LaTeX Error: File `footnotehyper.sty' not found.
> Enter file name:
> ! Emergency stop.
>
>
> l.36 \usepackage
> {amsmath}^^M
> ***
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 06:40:35PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 18:22 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > Compiling user guide doesn't work for me for quite some time
> > due to missing packages (some french & spanish babel related
> > stuff).
> > Likely just matter
Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 18:22 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Compiling user guide doesn't work for me for quite some time
> due to missing packages (some french & spanish babel related
> stuff).
> Likely just matter of installing them, then maybe other stuff
> pops up as well. I do not think we
Am Dienstag, den 04.02.2020, 18:11 +0100 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Is anyone able to reproduce the problems with Linux?
Works for me.
footnotehyper is in TeXLive and MikTeX as of 2016.
Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
lyx-devel mailing list
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 06:11:37PM +0100, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Perhaps my LaTeX installation is outdated.
>
> Is anyone able to reproduce the problems with Linux?
Compiling user guide doesn't work for me for quite some time
due to missing packages (some french & spanish babel related
stuff).
>>
>
> macOS 10.12, TeXLive 2019.
> Release version of LyX 2.3.4, as per download from ftp.lyx.org
>
> (Sunday, January 12, 2020 Qt Version (run-time): 5.9.8
> Qt Version (compile-time): 5.9.8)
>
>>> UserGuide.pdf on macOS with default PDF viewer is unu
On 03.02.20 23:35, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>
>> Just got around testing the Mac version.
>
> Which Mac version did you test? The version you’ve built from source or the
> official one from download?
>
macOS 10.12, TeXLive 2019.
Release version of LyX 2.3.4, as per d
Am 01.02.2020 um 14:48 schrieb mn :
>
> On 26.01.20 23:51, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
>> I've put a Windows installer here
>>
>> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/LyX-234-Installer-1.exe
>>
>> for testing. The main thing is that I've updated Image Magick and,
>> frankly, am not
On 26.01.20 23:51, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> I've put a Windows installer here
>
> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/LyX-234-Installer-1.exe
>
> for testing. The main thing is that I've updated Image Magick and,
> frankly, am not at all sure I've done so correctly. It did manage
Public release of LyX version 2.3.4
===
We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.3.4. This is the fourth
maintenance release in the 2.3.x series.
You can download LyX 2.3.4 from http://www.lyx.org/Download/.
LyX is a document processor that encourages
On 1/27/20 4:08 AM, Yu Jin wrote:
> Seems to work for me with imagemagick and ghostscript, tested some
> pictures and pdf, preview works.
Great. Thanks to you and to Andrew.
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
I guess the stable version's number should be updates to 2.3.5 on
https://www.lyx.org/RoadMap
Daniel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Seems to work for me with imagemagick and ghostscript, tested some pictures
and pdf, preview works.
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
On 27/01/2020 11:51 am, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
Hi, all,
I've put a Windows installer here
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/LyX-234-Installer-1.exe
for testing. The main thing is that I've updated Image Magick and,
frankly, am not at all sure I've done so correctly. It did
Hi, all,
I've put a Windows installer here
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/LyX-234-Installer-1.exe
for testing. The main thing is that I've updated Image Magick and,
frankly, am not at all sure I've done so correctly. It did manage to
export the User Guide, but I haven't tested
Le 20/01/2020 à 22:21, Anand Rangarajan a écrit :
OS: linux (opensuse leap 15.1)
Qt version: 5.14.0
I compiled and ran lyx-2.3.4 with the configuration shown below. A
problem seen in Feb 2019
(https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg108800.html) is
still present. When I
OS: linux (opensuse leap 15.1)
Qt version: 5.14.0
I compiled and ran lyx-2.3.4 with the configuration shown below. A problem
seen in Feb 2019 (
https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg108800.html) is
still present. When I attempt to write an integral within a math
environment
Ok, as you proposed I renamed the first variable and defined the other one
to 0. Also I have found another file, where these needed to be passed to
the IDE, I attached a patch file. It compiles successfully for me now.
Eugene
Am Fr., 17. Jan. 2020 um 12:52 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Wed,
Am Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:01:22 +0100
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:41:30 +0100
> schrieb Kornel Benko :
>
> > Am Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:40:48 +0100
> > schrieb Yu Jin :
> >
> > > Compiling LyX 2.3.3 also works fine for me, but in
> > >
Am Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:41:30 +0100
schrieb Kornel Benko :
> Am Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:40:48 +0100
> schrieb Yu Jin :
>
> > Compiling LyX 2.3.3 also works fine for me, but in
> > https://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/446769203f157ef5ff964e6d7355f840c8c91cac/lyxgit/development/cmake/lyx.rc
> > the
Am Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:40:48 +0100
schrieb Yu Jin :
> Compiling LyX 2.3.3 also works fine for me, but in
> https://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/446769203f157ef5ff964e6d7355f840c8c91cac/lyxgit/development/cmake/lyx.rc
> the lyx.rc file was changed, lines 24 and 25 now contain "
>
Am Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:40:48 +0100
schrieb Yu Jin :
> Compiling LyX 2.3.3 also works fine for me, but in
> https://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/446769203f157ef5ff964e6d7355f840c8c91cac/lyxgit/development/cmake/lyx.rc
> the lyx.rc file was changed, lines 24 and 25 now contain "
>
Compiling LyX 2.3.3 also works fine for me, but in
https://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/446769203f157ef5ff964e6d7355f840c8c91cac/lyxgit/development/cmake/lyx.rc
the lyx.rc file was changed, lines 24 and 25 now contain "
LYX_RELEASE_LEVEL,LYX_RELEASE_PATCH ", I could not find these anywhere else
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 02:07:23PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Please find source files for testing here:
>
> http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
I tested on various older distross with mixture of qt5/qt4 and all seem fine.
Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
Please find source files for testing here:
http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/
For those of you for whom it is relevant, assuming all is well, I could
do the release Thursday if we had binaries by then. If not, I'll be very
busy over the weekend, and it will have to be the following
Hi, all,
Please prepare translations for LyX 2.3.4. We hope to release around 1
December, so if you could finish it by the 27th or so, that'd be great.
Thanks for all you do to support LyX.
Riki
Stable Branch Maintainer
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org
Le 14/11/2019 à 05:06, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit :
Hi, all,
I know I've talked before about moving towards a 2.3.4 release, but
things have just been kind of crazy here. That said, I should have some
time for this now, and the Wayland bug seems to demand action. So: Are
there any lingering
Am Mittwoch, den 13.11.2019, 23:06 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
> Hi, all,
>
> I know I've talked before about moving towards a 2.3.4 release, but
> things have just been kind of crazy here. That said, I should have
> some
> time for this now, and the Wayland bug seem
Hi, all,
I know I've talked before about moving towards a 2.3.4 release, but
things have just been kind of crazy here. That said, I should have some
time for this now, and the Wayland bug seems to demand action. So: Are
there any lingering bugs we really need to fix? Especailly are there any
70 matches
Mail list logo
