Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

Le 09/12/2020 à 10:00, Yuriy Skalko a écrit : But now Trac works without any server maintainer, right? As I understand Gitea don't require much maintenance. Upgrading it is just replacing one binary and restarting (I have done this several times without any issues) If there is interest

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On 12/10/20 11:31 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:13:21AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 12/10/20 8:26 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 11:41:53PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: You did the upgrade to CentOS 6 a while back, didn't you? Obviously, we

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:13:21AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 12/10/20 8:26 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 11:41:53PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > > You did the upgrade to CentOS 6 a while back, didn't you? Obviously, we > > > > can't be sure an

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On 12/10/20 10:00 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: [going back to lyx-devel] Le 09/12/2020 à 10:00, Yuriy Skalko a écrit : But now Trac works without any server maintainer, right? As I understand Gitea don't require much maintenance. Upgrading it is just replacing one binary and restarting (I

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On 12/10/20 8:26 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 11:41:53PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: You did the upgrade to CentOS 6 a while back, didn't you? Obviously, we can't be sure an upgrade to some newer version would go smoothly, but it worked all right last time, yes? All I

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

[going back to lyx-devel] Le 09/12/2020 à 10:00, Yuriy Skalko a écrit : But now Trac works without any server maintainer, right? As I understand Gitea don't require much maintenance. Upgrading it is just replacing one binary and restarting (I have done this several times without any issues) If

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 11:41:53PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > You did the upgrade to CentOS 6 a while back, didn't you? Obviously, we > > can't be sure an upgrade to some newer version would go smoothly, but it > > worked all right last time, yes? > > All I did was some upgrades of

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 19:24, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 07/12/2020 à 00:17, Yuriy Skalko a écrit : > > What about replacing Trac with Gitea? I have very successful experience > > with it -- simple to install, very fast and lightweight. > > It looks nice indeed, although I mostly saw the

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

Le 07/12/2020 à 00:17, Yuriy Skalko a écrit : What about replacing Trac with Gitea? I have very successful experience with it -- simple to install, very fast and lightweight. It looks nice indeed, although I mostly saw the interface :) One other issue I see with it is that it means we still

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

I would be very happy if we were able to replace trac with something more modern. If we cannot do it, it will become urgent soon to upgrade it, and thus to upgrade our aging CentOS 6 system (support was only until Nov 30, 2020). JMarc What about replacing Trac with Gitea? I have very

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

Le 06/12/2020 à 23:20, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : I would be very happy if we were able to replace trac with something more modern. If we cannot do it, it will become urgent soon to upgrade it, and thus to upgrade our aging CentOS 6 system (support was only until Nov 30, 2020). You did

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On 12/6/20 5:11 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 05/12/2020 à 22:41, Thibaut Cuvelier a écrit : >> On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 at 20:43, Pavel Sanda > > wrote: >> >>     On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 07:48:23PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: >> > What do you think of it? I already

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

Le 05/12/2020 à 22:41, Thibaut Cuvelier a écrit : On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 at 20:43, Pavel Sanda > wrote: On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 07:48:23PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > What do you think of it? I already made a quick search in the mailing list, > but I did

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

Am So., 6. Dez. 2020 um 00:58 Uhr schrieb Joel Kulesza : > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 12:51 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 08:43:03PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> > On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 07:48:23PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: >> > > What do you think of it? I already

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 12:51 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 08:43:03PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 07:48:23PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > > What do you think of it? I already made a quick search in the mailing > list, > > > but I did not the

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 10:41:26PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > To have a larger user base and better performance, GitHub is the better > option (more tools work out-of-the-box with it). GitLab has a clunkier > interface, in my opinion, but possibly more features than GitHub. Both are > good

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 at 20:43, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 07:48:23PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > What do you think of it? I already made a quick search in the mailing > list, > > but I did not the topic being discussed. > > Looks fine to me as well, though if you don't

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

Who runs that site? Does it only do this for github or other sites, too? Riki Some Silicon Valley startup :) Gitlab is supported too, so it will be usable for the forthcoming official mirror there. Yuriy -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On 12/5/20 2:43 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 07:48:23PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: >> What do you think of it? I already made a quick search in the mailing list, >> but I did not the topic being discussed. > Looks fine to me as well, though if you don't have strong

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On 12/5/20 3:11 PM, Yuriy Skalko wrote: > This is significantly better than browsing code on GitHub directly: > https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/cburschka/lyx Who runs that site? Does it only do this for github or other sites, too? Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org

An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

This is significantly better than browsing code on GitHub directly: https://sourcegraph.com/github.com/cburschka/lyx Also here is fast site with Doxygen documentation (only for stable branch): https://fossies.org/dox/lyx-2.3.6/ Yuriy -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 08:43:03PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 07:48:23PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > What do you think of it? I already made a quick search in the mailing list, > > but I did not the topic being discussed. > > Looks fine to me as well, though if you

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 07:48:23PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > What do you think of it? I already made a quick search in the mailing list, > but I did not the topic being discussed. Looks fine to me as well, though if you don't have strong preference, gitlab might be ideologically better

Re: An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

ing on a few files that use that module). That's why I usually try > to use either LyX's Trac (which is very slow) or an unofficial GitHub > repo (like https://github.com/cburschka/lyx > <https://github.com/cburschka/lyx>). > > Would it be possible to have an official GitHub /mirr

An official GitHub mirror for LyX?

either LyX's Trac (which is very slow) or an unofficial GitHub repo (like https://github.com/cburschka/lyx). Would it be possible to have an official GitHub *mirror* for LyX? I'm not proposing at all to switch all development to GitHub (you could not forbid force-push on the repo anymore