On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 01:40:11AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:45:10PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > Enrico, have you seen the following?
> > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/32263/
> >
> > In particular, note the patch set here:
> >
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:45:10PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> Enrico, have you seen the following?
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/32263/
>
> In particular, note the patch set here:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/32263/7//ALL
>
> "Clients attempting to acquire a
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:45:42AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I don't think that they are going to fix this issue that seems to be
> there since ages. I was not even aware of the problem and it is not
> even serious as giving focus to a window before pasting avoids it.
> Should they fix
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:45:42AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I don't think that they are going to fix this issue that seems to be
> there since ages. I was not even aware of the problem and it is not
> even serious as giving focus to a window before pasting avoids it.
True.
> Should
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 01:15:06PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:02:47PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 10. Juli 2016 um 11:53:37, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> >
> > >
> > > I suggest that I commit the previous patch you posted and then
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:02:47PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 10. Juli 2016 um 11:53:37, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
>
> >
> > I suggest that I commit the previous patch you posted and then you
> > can start from there.
>
> Please no. I am convinced now that you
Am Sonntag, 10. Juli 2016 um 11:53:37, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:47:08AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 um 21:26:51, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> >
> > > A more safe approach is based on looking at
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:47:08AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 um 21:26:51, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
>
> > A more safe approach is based on looking at QtCore/qconfig.h, which
> > directly tells you what is the default backend. Indeed it contains
> >
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:50:47AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 06:36:36PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > I have also extended the fix to Qt4 in much the same manner and it works
> > for me. In the attached patch I have also incorporated the changes for
> >
Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 um 21:26:51, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> A more safe approach is based on looking at QtCore/qconfig.h, which
> directly tells you what is the default backend. Indeed it contains
> #define QT_QPA_DEFAULT_PLATFORM_NAME "xcb"
> if X11 is the backend.
OK,
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 06:36:36PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I have also extended the fix to Qt4 in much the same manner and it works
> for me. In the attached patch I have also incorporated the changes for
> cmake, except for Qt4, as I don't know what is required.
I tested the new patch
Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 um 21:26:51, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 09:02:09PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > Then, looking at development/cmake/ConfigureChecks.cmake, it seems to
> > me that QT_USES_X11 is correctly set for Qt4, because the
Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 um 21:02:09, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 07:36:53PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 um 18:43:50, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> >
> > >
> > > Please, can you also check what has to be done for
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 09:02:09PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> Then, looking at development/cmake/ConfigureChecks.cmake, it seems to
> me that QT_USES_X11 is correctly set for Qt4, because the QX11Info header
> is always installed on all platforms and compilation fails if X11 is
> not the
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 07:36:53PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 um 18:43:50, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
>
> >
> > Please, can you also check what has to be done for Qt4? The problem
> > is that I have to use a X11 function and thus the X11 library should
Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 um 18:43:50, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 11:45:37AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 um 04:09:30, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> >
> > > I came up with the attached patch that solves the
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 11:45:37AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 um 04:09:30, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
>
> > I came up with the attached patch that solves the issue for me.
> > It requires the Qt5X11Extras module, which is not mandatory, though.
> > The
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 03:27:40AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> I tried a few random variations on your patch to squash the last
> warning. One that worked for me is to add
>
> return true;
>
> after
>
> xcb_flush(con);
>
> I have no idea if that makes any sense but perhaps it
Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016 um 04:09:30, schrieb Enrico Forestieri
> I came up with the attached patch that solves the issue for me.
> It requires the Qt5X11Extras module, which is not mandatory, though.
> The patch simply tries to refresh the timestamp of the selection request.
> I
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 04:09:30AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> I had a closer look at this issue. First of all, it occurs with both
> Qt4 and Qt5, the only difference being that Qt5 prints a warning.
> Then, it does not occur with all applications. I can reproduce with
> gnome-terminal
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:08:43AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:33:53PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:50:28PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 01:51:58PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > >
> >
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 11:20:24AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 08.07.2016, 05:15 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Jürgen can you reproduce now with the steps above?
>
> Yes. But I have no idea how to fix it.
OK. Thanks for taking a look.
Scott
signature.asc
Am Freitag, den 08.07.2016, 05:15 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Jürgen can you reproduce now with the steps above?
Yes. But I have no idea how to fix it.
Jürgen
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:56:40PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:05:47AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 23.06.2016, 21:43 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > Jürgen, any idea?
> >
> > No.
>
> OK I found a simple way to reproduce:
>
> 1.
Am Sonntag, 26. Juni 2016 um 18:11:20, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:33:53PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:50:28PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 01:51:58PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Le 26/06/2016 04:56, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Can anyone else reproduce?
Scott
Yes on Debian Jessie :
LyX 2.2.1dev (not released yet)
Empreinte de validation Git d9550acd
Configuration
Host type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Special build flags: build=development
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:33:53PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:50:28PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 01:51:58PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > > > Can anyone else reproduce?
> > >
> > > I cannot. It works for me even
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:33:53PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:50:28PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 01:51:58PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> >
> > > > Can anyone else reproduce?
> > >
> > > I cannot. It works for me even
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:50:28PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 01:51:58PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > > Can anyone else reproduce?
> >
> > I cannot. It works for me even compiling lyx as an X11 application
> > on cygwin (using Qt5) and middle-pasting to
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:32:03PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 26/06/2016 04:56, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > Can anyone else reproduce?
> >
>
> I can.
Good to know, thanks for checking.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 01:51:58PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Can anyone else reproduce?
>
> I cannot. It works for me even compiling lyx as an X11 application
> on cygwin (using Qt5) and middle-pasting to native windows applications
> that support it, such as gvim.
OK so it might be
Le 26/06/2016 04:56, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Can anyone else reproduce?
I can.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:56:40PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> OK I found a simple way to reproduce:
>
> 1. Open gedit (I don't think the application matters, I also tested with
> gnome-terminal) on the left side of the screen.
> 2. Open LyX on the right-side of the screen.
> 3. Select
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:05:47AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 23.06.2016, 21:43 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Jürgen, any idea?
>
> No.
OK I found a simple way to reproduce:
1. Open gedit (I don't think the application matters, I also tested with
gnome-terminal)
Am Donnerstag, den 23.06.2016, 21:43 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Jürgen, any idea?
No.
Jürgen
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:20:04AM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 02:06:34AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:48:18PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:20:49PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, 5.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 02:06:34AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:48:18PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:20:49PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2016 um 21:28:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> > >
> > >
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:48:18PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:20:49PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2016 um 21:28:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > > Does anyone else often get these annoying messages when running LyX from
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:20:49PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2016 um 21:28:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > Does anyone else often get these annoying messages when running LyX from
> > a terminal?
> >
> > QXcbClipboard: SelectionRequest too old
> >
> >
Am Sonntag, 5. Juni 2016 um 21:28:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> Does anyone else often get these annoying messages when running LyX from
> a terminal?
>
> QXcbClipboard: SelectionRequest too old
>
> I've been getting them for a while. I wonder if it is something
> particular
Does anyone else often get these annoying messages when running LyX from
a terminal?
QXcbClipboard: SelectionRequest too old
I've been getting them for a while. I wonder if it is something
particular to my system (e.g. because of the clipboard manager I use,
CopyQ).
Scott
signature.asc
41 matches
Mail list logo