Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| | Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
|
| When things are up and going again, yes.
|
| OTOH it might not be needed anymore, since I guess we will run anon
| access from the main subversion repo as
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Nah... in almost all cases rsync will do the job.
Do you use the fsfs backend (rather than Berkeley DB)?
Michael
Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| Nah... in almost all cases rsync will do the job.
|
| Do you use the fsfs backend (rather than Berkeley DB)?
Yes. (of course)
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Do you use the fsfs backend (rather than Berkeley DB)?
Yes. (of course)
Of course? Well, I don't like the idea of having thousands of files (one
for each revision) floating around. I prefer a single database.
Michael
Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| | Do you use the fsfs backend (rather than Berkeley DB)?
|
| Yes. (of course)
|
| Of course? Well, I don't like the idea of having thousands of files
| (one for each revision) floating around. I prefer a single database.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
If you have read about all the problems a bdb db can give you would
not think that.
Well, I have used BDB for years now. So far, I had no serious problems.
I see absolutely no recommandation on the subversion list that new
repos should use bdb.
To me it is a
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:01:22AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
It would be nice if the anoncvs mirror would still be available for some
time in order to convert some checked out trees to patches.
Check out
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 12:08:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Michael Gerz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| | Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
|
| When things are up and going again, yes.
|
| OTOH it might not be needed
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Nah... in almost all cases rsync will do the job.
|
| Indeed.
|
| I have been 'hot-rsyncing' about 80 of our company's projects iwth a
| total of ~6GB svn repositories for more than a year now and never had a
| single rsync-related problem. Especially
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >| Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
| >
| >When things are up and going again, yes.
| >
| >OTOH it might not be needed anymore, since I guess we will run anon
| >access from the main subversion
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Nah... in almost all cases rsync will do the job.
Do you use the fsfs backend (rather than Berkeley DB)?
Michael
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >Nah... in almost all cases rsync will do the job.
| >
| Do you use the fsfs backend (rather than Berkeley DB)?
Yes. (of course)
--
Lgb
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Do you use the fsfs backend (rather than Berkeley DB)?
Yes. (of course)
Of course? Well, I don't like the idea of having thousands of files (one
for each revision) floating around. I prefer a single database.
Michael
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >| Do you use the fsfs backend (rather than Berkeley DB)?
| >
| >Yes. (of course)
| >
| Of course? Well, I don't like the idea of having thousands of files
| (one for each revision) floating around. I prefer a single
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
If you have read about all the problems a bdb db can give you would
not think that.
Well, I have used BDB for years now. So far, I had no serious problems.
I see absolutely no recommandation on the subversion list that new
repos should use bdb.
To me it is a
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:01:22AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>
> > Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
>
> It would be nice if the anoncvs mirror would still be available for some
> time in order to convert some checked out trees to patches.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 12:08:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | >| Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
> | >
> | >When things are up and going again, yes.
> | >
> | >OTOH it might
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Nah... in almost all cases rsync will do the job.
|
| Indeed.
|
| I have been 'hot-rsyncing' about 80 of our company's projects iwth a
| total of ~6GB svn repositories for more than a year now and never had a
| single rsync-related problem.
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
It would be nice if the anoncvs mirror would still be available for some
time in order to convert some checked out trees to patches.
Georg
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
|
| Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
|
| It would be nice if the anoncvs mirror would still be available for some
| time in order to convert some checked out trees to patches.
For those of you with a
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
For those of you with a developer accoutn on aussie I have make it
possible to get read-only access to the old cvs tree.
Thanks.
You have to relocate your workingcopy to use aussie.lyx.org and to use
/home/lyx/cvs as the path. No anon access.
This can then be
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:01:22AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
It would be nice if the anoncvs mirror would still be available for some
time in order to convert some checked out trees to patches.
Good
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
When things are up and going again, yes.
OTOH it might not be needed anymore, since I guess we will run anon
access from the main subversion repo as well.
I think you have to use subversion's
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
It would be nice if the anoncvs mirror would still be available for some
time in order to convert some checked out trees to patches.
Georg
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
|
| > Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
|
| It would be nice if the anoncvs mirror would still be available for some
| time in order to convert some checked out trees to patches.
For those of you with a
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> For those of you with a developer accoutn on aussie I have make it
> possible to get read-only access to the old cvs tree.
Thanks.
> You have to relocate your workingcopy to use aussie.lyx.org and to use
> /home/lyx/cvs as the path. No anon access.
> This can then
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:01:22AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>
> > Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
>
> It would be nice if the anoncvs mirror would still be available for some
> time in order to convert some checked out trees to patches.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Can you send me instructions for updating my anoncvs mirror?
When things are up and going again, yes.
OTOH it might not be needed anymore, since I guess we will run anon
access from the main subversion repo as well.
I think you have to use subversion's
And I belive it will stay like that.
I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am going
to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion regardless.
The conversion is farily easy, I will do this from the CVS backup on
aussie.
If you have opinions on this you have to be quick
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:08:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
And I belive it will stay like that.
I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am going
to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion regardless.
The conversion is farily easy, I will do this from
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:08:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
And I belive it will stay like that.
I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am going
to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion regardless.
The conversion is farily easy, I will do this from
Kayvan A. Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:08:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| And I belive it will stay like that.
|
| I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am going
| to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion regardless.
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars And I belive it will stay like that.
Lars I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am
Lars going to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion
Lars regardless.
I guess we have no choice. Go for it.
JMarc
PS: Did
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
|
| Lars And I belive it will stay like that.
|
| Lars I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am
| Lars going to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion
| Lars
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lars Yes, but I have had no time to act on it.
That's OK, I wanted to be sure.
JMarc
Am Donnerstag, den 09.02.2006, 21:08 +0100 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am going
to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion regardless.
Good man!
John
And I belive it will stay like that.
I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am going
to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion regardless.
The conversion is farily easy, I will do this from the CVS backup on
aussie.
If you have opinions on this you have to be quick
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:08:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> And I belive it will stay like that.
>
> I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am going
> to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion regardless.
>
> The conversion is farily easy, I will do this
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:08:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> And I belive it will stay like that.
>
> I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am going
> to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion regardless.
>
> The conversion is farily easy, I will do this
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 09:08:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > And I belive it will stay like that.
| >
| > I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am going
| > to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> And I belive it will stay like that.
Lars> I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am
Lars> going to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion
Lars> regardless.
I guess we have no choice. Go for it.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> And I belive it will stay like that.
|
| Lars> I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am
| Lars> going to take the oppurtunity to change to
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Yes, but I have had no time to act on it.
That's OK, I wanted to be sure.
JMarc
Am Donnerstag, den 09.02.2006, 21:08 +0100 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
> I know that this is an really awkward time to do this, but I am going
> to take the oppurtunity to change to subversion regardless.
Good man!
John
[moz@lambent src]$ ping cvs.lyx.org
PING baywatch.lyx.org (80.232.38.163) from 81.98.80.66 : 56(84) bytes of data.
From blindemann.oslo.norway.trolltech.net (80.232.38.193) icmp_seq=1 Destination Host
Unreachable
[moz@lambent src]$ traceroute cvs.lyx.org
traceroute to baywatch.lyx.org
[moz@lambent src]$ ping cvs.lyx.org
PING baywatch.lyx.org (80.232.38.163) from 81.98.80.66 : 56(84) bytes of data.
>From blindemann.oslo.norway.trolltech.net (80.232.38.193) icmp_seq=1 Destination Host
>Unreachable
[moz@lambent src]$ traceroute cvs.lyx.org
traceroute to baywatch.lyx.org
46 matches
Mail list logo
