On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:21:11PM +0200, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Exporting with paper orientation "landscape" only works if
> package "geometry" is activated (it took me quite some time to find that
> out!!). Could you please ensure that "geometry" is activated automatically
> if "landscape" is
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 10:22:41AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Juergen> Don't agree! As Herbert pointed out A4 with or without
> Juergen> geometry changes margins. I for myself like the margins with
> Juergen> A4 + geometry while maybe for Herbert it's exactly the
> Juergen> oposite. So I
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 09:44:45AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 02-Aug-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> >| I think that the geometry button should be removed. LyX can decide
> >| automatically when to use geometry.sty.
> >
> > agree.
>
> Don't agree! As Herbert pointed out A4 with or
Hello!
Exporting with paper orientation "landscape" only works if
package "geometry" is activated (it took me quite some time to find that
out!!). Could you please ensure that "geometry" is activated automatically
if "landscape" is selected?
By the way: If "geometry" is a standard package and it
On 03-Aug-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dekel> I think that the geometry button should be removed. LyX can
> Dekel> decide automatically when to use geometry.sty.
>
> I'd rather have the margin entries activated only when one chooses
> 'custom' as papersize. I think the interface would be
On 02-Aug-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| I think that the geometry button should be removed. LyX can decide
>| automatically when to use geometry.sty.
>
> agree.
Don't agree! As Herbert pointed out A4 with or without geometry changes
margins. I for myself like the margins with A4 + geometr
On 03-Aug-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> We have anyway to make choices between a straightforward interface and
> more flexibility. Maybe some items could be moved into an 'advanced
> settings' part of the interface? The 'use geometry' button could go
> there for example.
>
> An idea like:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > By the way: If "geometry" is a standard package and it does not cause any
> > harm in combination with other packages, I recommend to use it all the
> > time. IMHO too many options are just confusing the user. For the same
>
> geometry has other default
Michael Schmitt wrote:
>
> By the way: If "geometry" is a standard package and it does not cause any
> harm in combination with other packages, I recommend to use it all the
> time. IMHO too many options are just confusing the user. For the same
geometry has other default values for the margins
