Re: Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-26 Thread Marcus Kriele
I have produced a new version of the layout files, the test files, and the templates. It has been posted to the bug tracker. This new version is now fully backward compatible. However, the style abstract now behaves differently as the current implementation is broken. The following price

Re: Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-26 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/26/2011 02:09 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote: I have produced a new version of the layout files, the test files, and the templates. It has been posted to the bug tracker. This new version is now fully backward compatible. However, the style abstract now behaves differently as the current

Re: Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-26 Thread Marcus Kriele
On 2011-4-26 14:58 , Richard Heck wrote: On 04/26/2011 02:09 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote: I have found that LyXHTML chokes on the table of contents. If the table of contents is removed in my example files then LyXHTML produces valid HTML files that can be read by Firefox 4. Hmm. Well, I should

Re: Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-26 Thread Marcus Kriele
I have produced a new version of the layout files, the test files, and the templates. It has been posted to the bug tracker. This new version is now fully backward compatible. However, the style abstract now behaves differently as the current implementation is broken. The following price

Re: Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-26 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/26/2011 02:09 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote: I have produced a new version of the layout files, the test files, and the templates. It has been posted to the bug tracker. This new version is now fully backward compatible. However, the style abstract now behaves differently as the current

Re: Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-26 Thread Marcus Kriele
On 2011-4-26 14:58 , Richard Heck wrote: On 04/26/2011 02:09 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote: I have found that LyXHTML chokes on the table of contents. If the table of contents is removed in my example files then LyXHTML produces valid HTML files that can be read by Firefox 4. Hmm. Well, I should

Re: Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-22 Thread Marcus Kriele
Here is a list of backward incompatibilities and issues with the existing layouts -- svglobal3.layout, (Original Layout, to be replaced by svjour3.layout) Original template Issues: a) Insets Keywords, PACS, Subclass: I do not know how to insert these inserts. (They are not listed in the

Re: Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-22 Thread Marcus Kriele
Here is a list of backward incompatibilities and issues with the existing layouts -- svglobal3.layout, (Original Layout, to be replaced by svjour3.layout) Original template Issues: a) Insets Keywords, PACS, Subclass: I do not know how to insert these inserts. (They are not listed in the

Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-21 Thread Marcus Kriele
I have prepared replacement layout files for Springer monographs (svmono.layout), Springer contributed books (svmult.layout), Springer journals (svjour3.layout). I also prepared a file svcommon.inc that is read by all three layout files. They do not depend on any current layout files. These

Re: Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-21 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/21/2011 05:52 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote: I have prepared replacement layout files for Springer monographs (svmono.layout), Springer contributed books (svmult.layout), Springer journals (svjour3.layout). I also prepared a file svcommon.inc that is read by all three layout files. They do

Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-21 Thread Marcus Kriele
I have prepared replacement layout files for Springer monographs (svmono.layout), Springer contributed books (svmult.layout), Springer journals (svjour3.layout). I also prepared a file svcommon.inc that is read by all three layout files. They do not depend on any current layout files. These

Re: Bug #7301: New layout for Springer (smono.layout, smult.layout, sjour3.layout)

2011-04-21 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/21/2011 05:52 PM, Marcus Kriele wrote: I have prepared replacement layout files for Springer monographs (svmono.layout), Springer contributed books (svmult.layout), Springer journals (svjour3.layout). I also prepared a file svcommon.inc that is read by all three layout files. They do