Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
We should see what reLyX did and port that to tex2lyx, then.
Georg I did that (at least partially). It works well with the example
Georg file.
Georg Is it OK to apply?
The use of the tex parser is indeed a bit
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> We should see what reLyX did and port that to tex2lyx, then.
Georg> I did that (at least partially). It works well with the example
Georg> file.
Georg> Is it OK to apply?
The use of the tex parser is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
We should see what reLyX did and port that to tex2lyx, then.
I did that (at least partially). It works well with the example file.
Is it OK to apply?
I am not sure if I got all noweb features that noweb2lyx could convert.
Kayvan, could you please check whether
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> We should see what reLyX did and port that to tex2lyx, then.
I did that (at least partially). It works well with the example file.
Is it OK to apply?
I am not sure if I got all noweb features that noweb2lyx could convert.
Kayvan, could you please check whether
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see that tex2lyx is now intended to have noweb conversion
capability.
Georg Who says that? AFAIK tex2lyx contains nothing noweb specific.
We should see what reLyX did and port that to tex2lyx, then.
Georg IMO we should maintain tex2lyx
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Georg == Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I see that tex2lyx is now intended to have noweb conversion
capability.
Georg Who says that? AFAIK tex2lyx contains nothing noweb specific.
Jean-Marc We should see what reLyX did and
Jean-Marc == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Marc Everything is very well described in
Jean-Marc lib/examples/noweb2lyx.in
Sorry, it is noweb2lyx.lyx (Fine example of literate programming,
BTW).
JMarc
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I think that the basic stuff (handling chunk...@) can be easily
done in tex2lyx. Kayvan, what are the other things that have to be
done? Is there a real need for a standalone noweb2lyx?
No, there is no real need for
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I see that tex2lyx is now intended to have noweb conversion
>> capability.
Georg> Who says that? AFAIK tex2lyx contains nothing noweb specific.
We should see what reLyX did and port that to tex2lyx, then.
Georg> IMO we should maintain
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I see that tex2lyx is now intended to have noweb conversion
>>> capability.
Georg> Who says that? AFAIK tex2lyx contains nothing noweb specific.
Jean-Marc> We should
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> Everything is very well described in
Jean-Marc> lib/examples/noweb2lyx.in
Sorry, it is noweb2lyx.lyx (Fine example of literate programming,
BTW).
JMarc
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 11:57:18AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think that the basic stuff (handling <>...@) can be easily
> done in tex2lyx. Kayvan, what are the other things that have to be
> done? Is there a real need for a standalone noweb2lyx?
No, there is no real need for
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:27:25AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
Hi all,
Did something change in the treatment of noweb2lyx? It no longer seems to
get installed.
I don't know.
I see that tex2lyx is now intended to have noweb conversion capability.
Who says that?
Georg Baum wrote:
IMO we should maintain tex2lyx documentation in .lyx format and not
as man page.
Attached. Before I commit this to CVS / invest any real time on
editing it, should we devise some character styles to show case this
new feature. All feedback on useful styles is welcome
I
Angus Leeming wrote:
I started marking tex2lyx as of the command character style
(undefined at the moment), but I notice that the LyX document that
results is very ugly:
\begin_layout Standard
\begin_inset CharStyle command
status inlined
\begin_layout Standard
\family roman
\series medium
Angus Leeming wrote:
H. My understanding of character styles is that a style foo will
have no effect on LaTeX output if the style foo is undefined.
That's clearly not the case; see attached.
I tried to mark the -c of Use -c to declare as character-style
command with Alt-x charstyle-insert
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
H. My understanding of character styles is that a style foo will
have no effect on LaTeX output if the style foo is undefined.
That's clearly not the case; see attached.
I tried to mark the -c of Use -c to declare as character-style
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:27:25AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Did something change in the treatment of noweb2lyx? It no longer seems to
>> get installed.
I don't know.
> I see that tex2lyx is now intended to have noweb conversion capability.
Who
Georg Baum wrote:
> IMO we should maintain tex2lyx documentation in .lyx format and not
> as man page.
Attached. Before I commit this to CVS / invest any real time on
editing it, should we devise some character styles to show case this
new feature. All feedback on useful styles is welcome
I
Angus Leeming wrote:
I started marking "tex2lyx" as of the "command" character style
(undefined at the moment), but I notice that the LyX document that
results is very ugly:
\begin_layout Standard
\begin_inset CharStyle command
status inlined
\begin_layout Standard
\family roman
\series
Angus Leeming wrote:
H. My understanding of character styles is that a style "foo" will
have no effect on LaTeX output if the style "foo" is undefined.
That's clearly not the case; see attached.
I tried to mark the "-c" of "Use -c to declare" as character-style
command with "Alt-x
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> H. My understanding of character styles is that a style "foo" will
>> have no effect on LaTeX output if the style "foo" is undefined.
>> That's clearly not the case; see attached.
>
>> I tried to mark the "-c" of "Use -c to declare" as
Hi all,
Did something change in the treatment of noweb2lyx? It no longer seems to
get installed.
---Kayvan
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89)
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:27:25AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
Hi all,
Did something change in the treatment of noweb2lyx? It no longer seems to
get installed.
I see that tex2lyx is now intended to have noweb conversion capability.
It seems broken, however. The man page for tex2lyx does
Hi all,
Did something change in the treatment of noweb2lyx? It no longer seems to
get installed.
---Kayvan
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids:
Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89)
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 09:27:25AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Did something change in the treatment of noweb2lyx? It no longer seems to
> get installed.
I see that tex2lyx is now intended to have noweb conversion capability.
It seems broken, however. The man page for tex2lyx
26 matches
Mail list logo
