Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

Am Sonntag, den 18.06.2017, 20:14 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > Here is a patch extended such that the status of the toolbar button > is recorded in the document but always asks for permission, allowing > to not be asked again for the current document on the current > machine. Why do we need

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

Am Sonntag, den 18.06.2017, 19:56 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > I think we need to provide an option to add -shell-escape only to > > specific documents and only on the given machine. This prevents > > sending > > documents with -shell-escape (main problem of a document setting). > > This

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

On 06/18/2017 02:14 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 07:56:48PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 06:47:14PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> >>> I don't know how the needauth thing works, but out "Do not ask again" >>> mechanism is per-document on

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 07:56:48PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 06:47:14PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > > I don't know how the needauth thing works, but out "Do not ask again" > > mechanism is per-document on the given machine only. > > I already proposed

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 06:47:14PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 18.06.2017, 18:36 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > Here is a proposal not relying on the needauth machinery. > > > > When a document needs to be processed with the -shell-escape option, > > the user should

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

Am Sonntag, 18. Juni 2017 um 18:47:14, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Am Sonntag, den 18.06.2017, 18:36 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > Here is a proposal not relying on the needauth machinery. > > > > When a document needs to be processed with the -shell-escape option, > >

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

Am Sonntag, den 18.06.2017, 18:36 +0200 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > Here is a proposal not relying on the needauth machinery. > > When a document needs to be processed with the -shell-escape option, > the user should edit the proper converter to add that option. > Thus, this option remains valid

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 05:53:08PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > It is a not-so-rare situation that the user needs to add -shell-escape as an > option to the LaTeX converter that is being used, in order to compile a > document. > > We can't ship documents that compile out-of-the-box without

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:48:21AM +0200, Guillaume MM wrote: > Le 29/05/2017 à 23:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > > It would be nice to make the process of temporarily using -shell-escape > > more user-friendly.[...] > > > > One solution is to add a set of converters, one for each LaTeX

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

Le 29/05/2017 à 23:53, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : It would be nice to make the process of temporarily using -shell-escape more user-friendly.[...] One solution is to add a set of converters, one for each LaTeX flavor, and then to specify the "needauth" flag for those converters.[...] Any

Re: Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 05:53:08PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > It is a not-so-rare situation that the user needs to add -shell-escape as an > option to the LaTeX converter that is being used, in order to compile a > document. > > We can't ship documents that compile out-of-the-box without

Can shell-escape take advantage of needauth framework?

It is a not-so-rare situation that the user needs to add -shell-escape as an option to the LaTeX converter that is being used, in order to compile a document. We can't ship documents that compile out-of-the-box without the user doing the dance of figuring out how to add the option. The average

<    1   2