Re: [PATCH] move doc changelogs out of attic

Le 16/04/2016 14:37, Richard Heck a écrit : Scott, I am not sure when we want to apply this. I prefer not for 2.2.0. It can now go to 2.3-staging. Is this something we want in 2.2.x? If so, it's fine to go to 2.2.1-staging, as it doesn't actually affect anything in the code. I did both.

Re: [PATCH] move doc changelogs out of attic

Am Samstag, 16. April 2016 um 08:37:04, schrieb Richard Heck > On 04/15/2016 05:48 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 06:20:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Le 07/04/2016 00:02, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : > >>> Am 05.04.2016 um 10:23 schrieb Jean-Marc

Re: [PATCH] move doc changelogs out of attic

On 04/15/2016 05:48 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 06:20:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 07/04/2016 00:02, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Am 05.04.2016 um 10:23 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: If the translators know where to look for the files, they are not personal

Re: [PATCH] move doc changelogs out of attic (was: Re: Replacement of "long table" by "multi-pages table" in the manuals)

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 06:20:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 07/04/2016 00:02, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : > >Am 05.04.2016 um 10:23 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > > > >>If the translators know where to look for the files, they are not > >>personal anymore. Just move them to lib/doc, don't

Re: [PATCH] move doc changelogs out of attic (was: Re: Replacement of "long table" by "multi-pages table" in the manuals)

Am Freitag, 15. April 2016 um 18:20:56, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Le 07/04/2016 00:02, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : > > Am 05.04.2016 um 10:23 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > > > >> If the translators know where to look for the files, they are not > >> personal anymore. Just move

[PATCH] move doc changelogs out of attic (was: Re: Replacement of "long table" by "multi-pages table" in the manuals)

:00 2001 From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <lasgout...@lyx.org> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:17:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Move the documentation changelogs out of attic They should not be hidden in this directory. --- lib/doc/Changelog-Customization-LyX_22x.txt| 17 ++ lib/doc/

Re: ChangeLogs

On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote: I'd like to move the ChangeLog files to a place where they do not produce any false positives when grepping around in the sources. I'd suggest src/ChangeLog - development/changelogs/ChangeLog.src src/mathed/ChangeLog - development/changelogs

Re: ChangeLogs

On Sat, 29 Sep 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote: I'd like to move the ChangeLog files to a place where they do not produce any false positives when grepping around in the sources. I'd suggest src/ChangeLog -> development/changelogs/ChangeLog.src src/mathed/ChangeLog -> development/chan

ChangeLogs

I'd like to move the ChangeLog files to a place where they do not produce any false positives when grepping around in the sources. I'd suggest src/ChangeLog - development/changelogs/ChangeLog.src src/mathed/ChangeLog - development/changelogs/ChangeLog.src.mathed or similar, plus a short

Re: ChangeLogs

On Saturday 29 September 2007 11:12:55 Andre Poenitz wrote: Objections? Andre' Not from me. :-) -- José Abílio

ChangeLogs

I'd like to move the ChangeLog files to a place where they do not produce any false positives when grepping around in the sources. I'd suggest src/ChangeLog -> development/changelogs/ChangeLog.src src/mathed/ChangeLog -> development/changelogs/ChangeLog.src.mathed or similar, plus a

Re: ChangeLogs

On Saturday 29 September 2007 11:12:55 Andre Poenitz wrote: > Objections? > > Andre' Not from me. :-) -- José Abílio

Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

Since we do not use the ChangeLogs anymore, I propose to keep them in svn but remove them from the distribution. José, Would that make sense? JMarc

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:06:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Since we do not use the ChangeLogs anymore, I propose to keep them in svn but remove them from the distribution. José, Would that make sense? If they are available from svn I don't see why not. Since those files have not been

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

José == José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: José On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:06:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Since we do not use the ChangeLogs anymore, I propose to keep them in svn but remove them from the distribution. José, Would that make sense? José If they are available from svn I

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thu, 3 May 2007, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: José == José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: José On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:06:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Since we do not use the ChangeLogs anymore, I propose to keep them in svn but remove them from the distribution. José, Would

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thursday 03 May 2007 17:25:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A symbolic file called 'ChangeLog' in the distribution could simply contain a suitable link into SVN. Or we put a note about it in README. In case there are lots of files called ChangeLog and browsing SVN i annoying, then we (I) could

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thu, 3 May 2007, José Matos wrote: There was one Changelog file per each main directory. Ok. I did a find and there was about 22 of them so I linked them here: http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ChangeLogs It only took a few minutes. /Christian -- Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thursday 03 May 2007 19:54:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. I did a find and there was about 22 of them so I linked them here: http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ChangeLogs It only took a few minutes. Thank you Christian. I would say that OLD-CHANGES probably also belongs to the bunch

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thu, 3 May 2007, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 03 May 2007 19:54:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. I did a find and there was about 22 of them so I linked them here: http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ChangeLogs It only took a few minutes. Thank you Christian. I would say that OLD

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

Uwe, may I rename your 'Changelog.txt' to 'ChangeLog.txt' (Or you can rename it. I guess Windoze must have the .txt) Yes, but note that you must delete the file from SVN and then re-add it with the new name in a second step. Otherwise SVN on Windows will complain that case sensitive renaming

Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

Since we do not use the ChangeLogs anymore, I propose to keep them in svn but remove them from the distribution. José, Would that make sense? JMarc

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:06:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Since we do not use the ChangeLogs anymore, I propose to keep them in > svn but remove them from the distribution. José, Would that make > sense? If they are available from svn I don't see why not. Since those files have

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

>>>>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:06:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Since we do not use the ChangeLogs anymore, I propose to keep them >> in svn but remove them from the distr

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thu, 3 May 2007, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> On Thursday 03 May 2007 14:06:45 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Since we do not use the ChangeLogs anymore, I propose to keep them in svn but remove them from the distri

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thursday 03 May 2007 17:25:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A symbolic file called 'ChangeLog' in the distribution could simply > contain a suitable link into SVN. Or we put a note about it in README. > > In case there are lots of files called ChangeLog and browsing SVN i > annoying, then we (I)

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thu, 3 May 2007, José Matos wrote: There was one Changelog file per each main directory. Ok. I did a find and there was about 22 of them so I linked them here: http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ChangeLogs It only took a few minutes. /Christian -- Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thursday 03 May 2007 19:54:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok. I did a find and there was about 22 of them so I linked them here: > http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ChangeLogs > > It only took a few minutes. Thank you Christian. I would say that OLD-CHANGES probably

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

On Thu, 3 May 2007, José Matos wrote: On Thursday 03 May 2007 19:54:00 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok. I did a find and there was about 22 of them so I linked them here: http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ChangeLogs It only took a few minutes. Thank you Christian. I would say that OLD

Re: Remove ChangeLogs from distribution?

> Uwe, may I rename your 'Changelog.txt' to 'ChangeLog.txt' (Or you can rename it. I guess Windoze > must have the .txt) Yes, but note that you must delete the file from SVN and then re-add it with the new name in a second step. Otherwise SVN on Windows will complain that case sensitive

[RFC] Changelogs

of ChangeLog that can be created with svn log. Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.) -- Lgb

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

On Friday 10 March 2006 15:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.) I would say that it seems a good idea. What is the usual procedure in other projects that use svn

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Friday 10 March 2006 15:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | Opinions on dropping changelogs? | (If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with | that either.) | | I would say that it seems a good idea. | What is the usual

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

on the commit. +1. I get annoyed with writing something twice when I commit a change. One point - it is nice for people downloading tarballs to be able to see what's changed here and there, so old fashioned Changelogs should still be generated for released tarballs. Hopefully not to difficult to make

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars I belive that subversion use the commit messages, but gcc is Lars using ChangeLog files as they have done is the past. ChangeLogs are nice when you do not have net access. JMarc

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:36:56PM +, John C. Spray wrote: One point - it is nice for people downloading tarballs to be able to see what's changed here and there, so old fashioned Changelogs should still be generated for released tarballs. Hopefully not to difficult to make automatic. I

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

Changelogs should still be generated for released tarballs. Hopefully not to difficult to make automatic. John

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Lars I belive that subversion use the commit messages, but gcc is | Lars using ChangeLog files as they have done is the past. | | ChangeLogs are nice when you do not have net access. Yes

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to Lars continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.) Also, the typical changelogs we have are better than our svn commits. Are we sure we will still have per file

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Lars Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to | Lars continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.) | | Also, the typical changelogs we have are better than

[RFC] Changelogs

of ChangeLog that can be created with svn log. Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.) -- Lgb

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

On Friday 10 March 2006 15:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Opinions on dropping changelogs? > (If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with > that either.) I would say that it seems a good idea. What is the usual procedure in other projects tha

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Friday 10 March 2006 15:10, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Opinions on dropping changelogs? | > (If the rest of you want to continue usingthem I have no problem with | > that either.) | | I would say that it seems a good idea. | Wh

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

the log message on the > commit. +1. I get annoyed with writing something twice when I commit a change. One point - it is nice for people downloading tarballs to be able to see what's changed here and there, so old fashioned Changelogs should still be generated for released tarballs. Hopefull

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> I belive that subversion use the commit messages, but gcc is Lars> using ChangeLog files as they have done is the past. ChangeLogs are nice when you do not have net access. JMarc

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:36:56PM +, John C. Spray wrote: > One point - it is nice for people downloading tarballs to be able to see > what's changed here and there, so old fashioned Changelogs should still > be generated for released tarballs. Hopefully not to difficult to make &g

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

Changelogs should still be generated for released tarballs. Hopefully not to difficult to make automatic. John

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> I belive that subversion use the commit messages, but gcc is | Lars> using ChangeLog files as they have done is the past. | | C

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to Lars> continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.) Also, the typical changelogs we have are better than our svn co

Re: [RFC] Changelogs

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Opinions on dropping changelogs? (If the rest of you want to | Lars> continue usingthem I have no problem with that either.

Re: [PATCH] Changelogs for the other Docbook patches

On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 01:49:37PM +, Andreas Vox wrote: Sorry, that's what happens if I use anything but vi to edit changelogs. Forgiven? Certainly. :-) The whole exercise was just to show you that small patches are a lot easier to deal for all of us. :-) And also that we read

Re: [PATCH] Changelogs for the other Docbook patches

On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 01:49:37PM +, Andreas Vox wrote: > > Sorry, that's what happens if I use anything but vi to edit changelogs. > > Forgiven? Certainly. :-) The whole exercise was just to show you that small patches are a lot easier to deal for all of us. :-) And

[PATCH] Changelogs for the other Docbook patches

Hi! I bundled those extra since they relate to all other patches. This time I didn't erase any blanks but replaced all blanks by double blanks, as is required for the Changelog format ;-) Josè, could you commit these patches? I want to go on with the allowedNameChars runparam, DBTeXMath, calling

Re: [PATCH] Changelogs for the other Docbook patches

()) - ls = id = \ + ls + \; + ls = id=\ + ls + \; // Write opening SGML tags. switch (style-latextype) { You speak of changelogs and send me a code change? ;-) Index: src/insets/ChangeLog

[PATCH] Changelogs for the other Docbook patches

Hi! I bundled those extra since they relate to all other patches. This time I didn't erase any blanks but replaced all blanks by double blanks, as is required for the Changelog format ;-) Josè, could you commit these patches? I want to go on with the allowedNameChars runparam, DBTeXMath, calling

Re: [PATCH] Changelogs for the other Docbook patches

string ls = par->getDocbookId(); > if (!ls.empty()) > - ls = " id = \"" + ls + "\""; > + ls = " id=\"" + ls + "\""; > > // Write opening S

Changelogs

Could we please move a large portion of src/Changelog and src/insets/Changelog into, say, */Changelog.OLD. Updating these over a modem line is a pain... Andre'

Re: Changelogs

Andre Poenitz wrote: Could we please move a large portion of src/Changelog and src/insets/Changelog into, say, */Changelog.OLD. Why not src/ChangeLog.pre14x src/insets/ChangeLog.pre14x Then just rename the ChangeLog after we release. Seems scalable to me... Updating these

Re: Changelogs

On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:41:53PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: Andre Poenitz wrote: Could we please move a large portion of src/Changelog and src/insets/Changelog into, say, */Changelog.OLD. Why not src/ChangeLog.pre14x src/insets/ChangeLog.pre14x Then just rename the

Re: Changelogs

Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andre Could we please move a large portion of src/Changelog and Andre src/insets/Changelog into, say, */Changelog.OLD. Andre Updating these over a modem line is a pain... I think the GNU use is to move ChangeLog to ChangeLog.1 (or

Re: Changelogs

On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 04:19:40PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Andre == Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andre Could we please move a large portion of src/Changelog and Andre src/insets/Changelog into, say, */Changelog.OLD. Andre Updating these over a modem line is a pain...

Changelogs

Could we please move a large portion of src/Changelog and src/insets/Changelog into, say, */Changelog.OLD. Updating these over a modem line is a pain... Andre'

Re: Changelogs

Andre Poenitz wrote: > Could we please move a large portion of src/Changelog and > src/insets/Changelog into, say, */Changelog.OLD. Why not src/ChangeLog.pre14x src/insets/ChangeLog.pre14x Then just rename the ChangeLog after we release. Seems scalable to me... > Updating these

Re: Changelogs

On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 01:41:53PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Could we please move a large portion of src/Changelog and > > src/insets/Changelog into, say, */Changelog.OLD. > > Why not > src/ChangeLog.pre14x > src/insets/ChangeLog.pre14x > > Then just

Re: Changelogs

> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> Could we please move a large portion of src/Changelog and Andre> src/insets/Changelog into, say, */Changelog.OLD. Andre> Updating these over a modem line is a pain... I think the GNU use is to move ChangeLog to ChangeLog.1 (or

Re: Changelogs

On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 04:19:40PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> Could we please move a large portion of src/Changelog and > Andre> src/insets/Changelog into, say, */Changelog.OLD. > > Andre> Updating these over a modem

Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

Hi, Sometime back all email addresses have been removed from the header lines in the files, since these email addresses are listed already in the CREDITS file. Why not do the same with the ChangeLogs? I would be pleased to be freed from typing my email address each time I type an new entry

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

R. Lahaye [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi, | Sometime back all email addresses have been removed from the header lines in | the files, since these email addresses are listed already in the CREDITS file. | Why not do the same with the ChangeLogs? No way! | I would be pleased to be freed from

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thursday 12 September 2002 11:39 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes Use a system that handles the ChangeLog for you (eg. emacs) Incidentally, what do I need to do to get emacs to help me in this regard. Do I need to set any vars in my .emacs file? If so, what? Angus

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:15:37AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: On Thursday 12 September 2002 11:39 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes Use a system that handles the ChangeLog for you (eg. emacs) Incidentally, what do I need to do to get emacs to help me in this regard. Do I need to set any vars

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thursday 12 September 2002 12:48 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: Incidentally, what do I need to do to get emacs to help me in this regard. Do I need to set any vars in my .emacs file? If so, what? Just open a file with the name of ChangeLog :-) Oh, I know that. Thought there might be

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 07:23:54PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote: I would be pleased to be freed from typing my email address each time I type an new entry in the ChangeLog. iab chl C-R=strftime(%Y-%m-%d John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED])CRCRCR^[^Mki * Works nice in combination with syntax

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus On Thursday 12 September 2002 11:39 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes Use a system that handles the ChangeLog for you (eg. emacs) Angus Incidentally, what do I need to do to get emacs to help me in Angus this regard. Do I need to set any vars in my

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thursday 12 September 2002 1:01 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus On Thursday 12 September 2002 11:39 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes Use a system that handles the ChangeLog for you (eg. emacs) Angus Incidentally, what do I need to do to

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus Oh, fantastic. Thanks JMarc. Now is there a way of specifying Angus my preferred email address [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Angus 2002-09-12 Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] Angus * xforms_helpers.C (read): I think it uses the variable

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Thursday 12 September 2002 1:01 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes | wrote: Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Angus On Thursday 12 September 2002 11:39 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes Use a system that handles the ChangeLog for you (eg. emacs)

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thursday 12 September 2002 1:48 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: I guess user-mail-address Set it with Customize. Thank you, both. A

Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

Hi, Sometime back all email addresses have been removed from the header lines in the files, since these email addresses are listed already in the CREDITS file. Why not do the same with the ChangeLogs? I would be pleased to be freed from typing my email address each time I type an new entry

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

"R. Lahaye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi, > | Sometime back all email addresses have been removed from the header lines in | the files, since these email addresses are listed already in the CREDITS file. > | Why not do the same with the ChangeLogs? No way! | I would

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thursday 12 September 2002 11:39 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes > Use a system that handles the ChangeLog for you (eg. emacs) Incidentally, what do I need to do to get emacs to help me in this regard. Do I need to set any vars in my .emacs file? If so, what? Angus

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:15:37AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Thursday 12 September 2002 11:39 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes > > > Use a system that handles the ChangeLog for you (eg. emacs) > > Incidentally, what do I need to do to get emacs to help me in > this regard. Do I need to set

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thursday 12 September 2002 12:48 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Incidentally, what do I need to do to get emacs to help me > > in this regard. Do I need to set any vars in my .emacs file? > > If so, what? > Just open a file with the name of ChangeLog :-) Oh, I know that. Thought there might

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 07:23:54PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote: > I would be pleased to be freed from typing my email address each time I > type an new entry in the ChangeLog. iab chl =strftime("%Y-%m-%d John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>")^[^Mki * Works nice in combination with syntax highlighting

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Thursday 12 September 2002 11:39 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes >> Use a system that handles the ChangeLog for you (eg. emacs) Angus> Incidentally, what do I need to do to get emacs to help me in Angus> this regard. Do I need to set

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thursday 12 September 2002 1:01 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> On Thursday 12 September 2002 11:39 am, Lars Gullik > Bjønnes > > >> Use a system that handles the ChangeLog for you (eg. emacs) > > Angus> Incidentally,

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Oh, fantastic. Thanks JMarc. Now is there a way of specifying Angus> my preferred email address <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>? Angus> 2002-09-12 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Angus> * xforms_helpers.C (read): I think it uses the

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thursday 12 September 2002 1:01 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes | wrote: >> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Angus> On Thursday 12 September 2002 11:39 am, Lars Gullik >> Bjønnes >> >> >> Use a system that handles the

Re: Remove email addresses from ChangeLogs too.

On Thursday 12 September 2002 1:48 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I guess "user-mail-address" > > Set it with Customize. Thank you, both. A