No, regex.c is also missing from the distribution, and then you don't
need regex.h.
Looking into the makefile I mentioned that REGEX is set to 'lyxregex.h
regex.c' so regex.c is needed, too. But when compiling regex.c there should
exist regex.h because it is included. So I think you need
> No, regex.c is also missing from the distribution, and then you don't
> need regex.h.
Looking into the makefile I mentioned that REGEX is set to 'lyxregex.h
regex.c' so regex.c is needed, too. But when compiling regex.c there should
exist regex.h because it is included. So I think you need
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Andre Poenitz wrote:
I tried to use the mingw32 environment on Win98, too to produce a real
Win-Executable.
*scratch head* I'd like to try that, too... but: How does one specify
the usage of a certain compiler when running ./configure?
[...]
If someone could
LyX 1.1.4 could be compiled on Win98 using the cygnus environment with the
released source tar file when the missing file lyxregex.h is available.
Furthermore one needs regex-0.12, i.e. regex.c and regex.h both copied into
src/support.
This compiled out-of-the-box-Lyx runs stable so long as you
"Claus Hentschel" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| LyX 1.1.4 could be compiled on Win98 using the cygnus environment with the
| released source tar file when the missing file lyxregex.h is available.
| Furthermore one needs regex-0.12, i.e. regex.c and regex.h both copied into
| src/support.
No,
I tried to use the mingw32 environment on Win98, too to produce a real
Win-Executable.
*scratch head* I'd like to try that, too... but:
How does one specify the usage of a certain compiler when running ./configure?
For my own project I use mingw32 for crosscompiling from Linux to
Windows,
What do you mean by "a real Windows executable"?
cygwin does just that - it produces a real executable.
On NT, the problem with inlined figures is not the forking, forking maybe a kludge but
it
seems to actually work, the problem is, that you need a ghostscript executable with X11
support.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > I tried to use the mingw32 environment on Win98, too to produce a real
>Win-Executable.
>
> *scratch head* I'd like to try that, too... but: How does one specify
> the usage of a certain compiler when running ./configure?
[...]
> If someone could
LyX 1.1.4 could be compiled on Win98 using the cygnus environment with the
released source tar file when the missing file lyxregex.h is available.
Furthermore one needs regex-0.12, i.e. regex.c and regex.h both copied into
src/support.
This compiled out-of-the-box-Lyx runs stable so long as you
"Claus Hentschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| LyX 1.1.4 could be compiled on Win98 using the cygnus environment with the
| released source tar file when the missing file lyxregex.h is available.
| Furthermore one needs regex-0.12, i.e. regex.c and regex.h both copied into
| src/support.
No,
> I tried to use the mingw32 environment on Win98, too to produce a real
>Win-Executable.
*scratch head* I'd like to try that, too... but:
How does one specify the usage of a certain compiler when running ./configure?
For my own project I use mingw32 for crosscompiling from Linux to
Windows,
What do you mean by "a real Windows executable"?
cygwin does just that - it produces a real executable.
On NT, the problem with inlined figures is not the forking, forking maybe a kludge but
it
seems to actually work, the problem is, that you need a ghostscript executable with X11
support.
12 matches
Mail list logo
