samar j. singh wrote:
I know exactly what I was doing when it crashed. That was putting the
cursor on the scroll bars to move up the document. At the point when I
attempted to move the scroll bar up with the mouse, Lyx immediately crashed
providing the followiing output.
Seems that the cursor
On Thursday 02 February 2006 16:25, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
samar j. singh wrote:
I know exactly what I was doing when it crashed. That was putting the
cursor on the scroll bars to move up the document. At the point when I
attempted to move the scroll bar up with the mouse, Lyx
samar j. singh wrote:
Yes, indeed, I have. Have undone it now. I think your hypothesis may be
consistent with the previous correlation with the pageup/down use as that
would also cause the cursor to be repositioned. However, how come this
cannot be replicated consistently. That probably
On Thursday 02 February 2006 17:00, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
samar j. singh wrote:
Yes, indeed, I have. Have undone it now. I think your hypothesis may be
consistent with the previous correlation with the pageup/down use as that
would also cause the cursor to be repositioned. However,
samar j. singh wrote:
If you can explain the characteristics of a closed collapsible inset I
might get an idea of the type of thing to target in the document that
would create this.
A collapsable inset is one that you can open or close, e.g. a minipage/box,
a float, or ERT. In closed form it
samar j. singh wrote:
If you can explain the characteristics of a closed collapsible inset I
might get an idea of the type of thing to target in the document that would
create this.
collapsable insets are the things you can open and close: footnotes, floats,
note insets etc. We had crashes
On Thursday 02 February 2006 23:18, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
samar j. singh wrote:
If you can explain the characteristics of a closed collapsible inset I
might get an idea of the type of thing to target in the document that
would create this.
collapsable insets are the things you can
samar j. singh wrote:
> I know exactly what I was doing when it crashed. That was putting the
> cursor on the scroll bars to move up the document. At the point when I
> attempted to move the scroll bar up with the mouse, Lyx immediately crashed
> providing the followiing output.
Seems that the
On Thursday 02 February 2006 16:25, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> samar j. singh wrote:
> > I know exactly what I was doing when it crashed. That was putting the
> > cursor on the scroll bars to move up the document. At the point when I
> > attempted to move the scroll bar up with the mouse, Lyx
samar j. singh wrote:
> Yes, indeed, I have. Have undone it now. I think your hypothesis may be
> consistent with the previous correlation with the pageup/down use as that
> would also cause the cursor to be repositioned. However, how come this
> cannot be replicated consistently. That probably
On Thursday 02 February 2006 17:00, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> samar j. singh wrote:
> > Yes, indeed, I have. Have undone it now. I think your hypothesis may be
> > consistent with the previous correlation with the pageup/down use as that
> > would also cause the cursor to be repositioned.
samar j. singh wrote:
> If you can explain the characteristics of a "closed collapsible inset" I
> might get an idea of the type of thing to target in the document that
> would create this.
A collapsable inset is one that you can open or close, e.g. a minipage/box,
a float, or ERT. In closed
samar j. singh wrote:
> If you can explain the characteristics of a "closed collapsible inset" I
> might get an idea of the type of thing to target in the document that would
> create this.
"collapsable insets" are the things you can open and close: footnotes, floats,
note insets etc. We had
On Thursday 02 February 2006 23:18, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> samar j. singh wrote:
> > If you can explain the characteristics of a "closed collapsible inset" I
> > might get an idea of the type of thing to target in the document that
> > would create this.
>
> "collapsable insets" are the
On Monday 30 January 2006 23:45, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
samar j. singh wrote:
Still a bit of confusion. In 2 above it is compiling lyx that you are
talking about, is that correct?
yes.
Should I wait for 1.4pre4?
you could try the -dbg action thing already with pre3, if you
On Monday 30 January 2006 23:45, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> samar j. singh wrote:
> > Still a bit of confusion. In 2 above it is compiling lyx that you are
> > talking about, is that correct?
>
> yes.
>
> > Should I wait for 1.4pre4?
>
> you could try the -dbg action thing already with pre3,
16 matches
Mail list logo
