Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
| How long? Or more specifically: Why not now?
Mostly selfish reason.
Give this scons stuff to settle a bit and we will look at it.
OK, I will come back when I think it is time.
Georg
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak I understand all this, really. Nevertheless, maybe because
Abdelrazak of this bad past experience, I have the feeling that you
Abdelrazak (as a whole) are over protective with your baby. LyX is
Abdelrazak not a baby anymore,
Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was expecting that only the aspell.C file would be recompiled but
I see that everything is being recompiled (see attached
scons_lyx.log), is that normal, Bo?
Bo That is because the whole commands that generate other files are
Bo also changed,
On Thursday 11 May 2006 08:40, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What would we do with a bear??
You should use it to keep the beer cool, I can assure you that there are not
many people brave (== foolish) enough to face a polar bear just for a beer.
So as you see your beer will be safe and cool.
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 18:49, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| That sounds like the maintainer you were looking for Lars :-)
Can we trust a person that is afraid of cucumbers?
Are you cucumberhater-o-fobic by any change?
I am starting to think about withdrawing my proposal for the next
Jose' Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wednesday 10 May 2006 18:49, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| | That sounds like the maintainer you were looking for Lars :-)
|
| Can we trust a person that is afraid of cucumbers?
|
| Are you cucumberhater-o-fobic by any change?
|
| I am starting
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:40:33AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
On 5/9/06, Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:08:21AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
Vim is *the* editing tool for me. *You can tell from the first line of
every SCons* files).
Why is this needed btw?
Can't
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> | How long? Or more specifically: Why not now?
>
> Mostly selfish reason.
>
> Give this scons stuff to settle a bit and we will look at it.
OK, I will come back when I think it is time.
Georg
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> I understand all this, really. Nevertheless, maybe because
Abdelrazak> of this bad past experience, I have the feeling that you
Abdelrazak> (as a whole) are over protective with your baby. LyX is
Abdelrazak> not a
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I was expecting that only the aspell.C file would be recompiled but
>> I see that everything is being recompiled (see attached
>> scons_lyx.log), is that normal, Bo?
Bo> That is because the whole commands that generate other files are
Bo> also
On Thursday 11 May 2006 08:40, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What would we do with a bear??
You should use it to keep the beer cool, I can assure you that there are not
many people brave (== foolish) enough to face a polar bear just for a beer.
So as you see your beer will be safe and cool.
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 18:49, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | That sounds like the maintainer you were looking for Lars :-)
>
> Can we trust a person that is afraid of cucumbers?
Are you cucumberhater-o-fobic by any change?
I am starting to think about withdrawing my proposal for the next
Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 10 May 2006 18:49, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | That sounds like the maintainer you were looking for Lars :-)
| >
| > Can we trust a person that is afraid of cucumbers?
|
| Are you cucumberhater-o-fobic by any change?
|
| I am
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:40:33AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> On 5/9/06, Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:08:21AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> >> Vim is *the* editing tool for me. *You can tell from the first line of
> >> every SCons* files).
> >
> >Why is this needed
Bo Peng a écrit :
because I asked for aspell support when configuring (I presume that
it is not possible to have aspell at the moment).
Not now. Please wait till we have the basics done.
I think it is possible to have aspell with your new extra_inc_path1 and
extra_lib_path1, isn't it?
Bo Peng wrote:
A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
(I know, this leads to non-portability. but this is life).
So this is the answer to my offer to do the renaming on a rainy weekend?
Good
Bo Peng a écrit :
Abdel said that scons is able to recognize .C files as C++ source
files on a native Windows environment. Why it is not able to do so
with cygwin?
I did not read that email in detail, what I know is that gcc tells the
content of a .c file and make itself g++ if the file is
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:32:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng a écrit :
because I asked for aspell support when configuring (I presume that
it is not possible to have aspell at the moment).
Not now. Please wait till we have the basics done.
I think it is possible to have
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:32:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng a écrit :
because I asked for aspell support when configuring (I presume that
it is not possible to have aspell at the moment).
Not now. Please wait till we have the basics done.
I think it
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:43:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng a écrit :
Abdel said that scons is able to recognize .C files as C++ source
files on a native Windows environment. Why it is not able to do so
with cygwin?
I did not read that email in detail, what I know is that gcc
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Could I suggest that you list the initial features that you want so that
| scons stays in SVN?
|
| Lars wants an immediate replacement for autotools. That will not
| happen any time soon.
No. I want immediate proof that scons is _capable_ of replacing
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
(I know, this leads to non-portability. but this is life).
So this is
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:43:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng a écrit :
Abdel said that scons is able to recognize .C files as C++ source
files on a native Windows environment. Why it is not able to do so
with cygwin?
I did not read that email in
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
(I know, this leads to non-portability. but
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:52:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:32:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng a écrit :
because I asked for aspell support when configuring (I presume that
it is not possible to have aspell at the
Georg Baum a écrit :
(but I don't understand why we
need scons in 1.4 at all, since it is only a maintenance branch)
Agreed. We have already enough difficulty to let it stay in 1.5 so
please don't advocate 1.4.
Abdel.
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:39:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Wait a moment Abdel. If scons is using gcc to compile .C files it means
that it is not able to recognize them as C++ sources.
I confirm that Scons is using gcc and g++ to compile the .C file. I
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:39:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
But gcc is used everywhere! I have removed 'win32' from the code above
and it works the same.
And you are using a native python, right?
Right.
I think these environment variable are simply
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:52:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:32:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng a écrit :
because I asked for aspell support when configuring (I presume that
it is not
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:18:46PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Yep, actually I didn't need the xxx1 options because I only need aspell
(what's this aiksaurus anyway??):
It's a thesaurus
http://aiksaurus.sourceforge.net/
--
Enrico
Joost If compilation with MSVC++ worked, the vcproj files would be
Joost very useful. However, there are still incompatibilities that
Joost break important things.
It used to work. What is broken now?
Scons claims that it can generate vc project file so I think this is
an easier way to
On 5/9/06, Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:08:21AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
Vim is *the* editing tool for me. *You can tell from the first line of
every SCons* files).
Why is this needed btw?
Can't you use autocmd for it?
I know, but when someone else is
When scons install works, I will look at making it part of my daily builds.
This is the easy part, and will be done shortly.
What are more difficult are scons dist, dist-clean, rpm etc, by which
autotools are proud of.
Bo
A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
(I know, this leads to non-portability. but this is life).
So this is the answer to my offer to do the renaming on a rainy weekend?
Good to know, if you
No. I want immediate proof that scons is _capable_ of replacing
autotools. Huge difference.
Actually, I would like to free myself from the obligation of
challenging autotools. I personally believe that scons will evolve to
a state that can replace autotools without doubt, but it is not easy
to
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 16:51, Bo Peng wrote:
I have no right to make such a big decision. I proposed a filename
change and get is your problem fixed? reply. Namely, as long as lyx
is working, such a big change is not welcome, especially when the
source of the problem is from the stupidity of
So this is the answer to my offer to do the renaming on a rainy weekend?
Good to know, if you continue like this you will save me some time because
I don't need to read your posts anymore.
I can't speak for Bo, of course, but I think he had 1.4 in mind.
No, I only had 1.5 in mind. I was
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| No. I want immediate proof that scons is _capable_ of replacing
| autotools. Huge difference.
|
| Actually, I would like to free myself from the obligation of
| challenging autotools. I personally believe that scons will evolve to
| a state that can replace
Bo Peng a écrit :
A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
(I know, this leads to non-portability. but this is life).
So this is the answer to my offer to do the renaming on a rainy weekend?
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Bo Peng a écrit :
| A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
| the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
| (I know, this leads to non-portability. but this is life).
|
| So this is the
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| No. I want immediate proof that scons is _capable_ of replacing
| autotools. Huge difference.
|
| Actually, I would like to free myself from the obligation of
| challenging autotools. I personally believe that scons will
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak Come on guys, keep cool. Lars just agreed for Scons
Abdelrazak presence in trunk... IMHO there's better things in life
Abdelrazak than to fight for these little matters.
There was a time when developing for LyX did not involve
Bo Peng wrote:
I have no right to make such a big decision. I proposed a filename
change and get is your problem fixed? reply. Namely, as long as lyx
is working, such a big change is not welcome, especially when the
source of the problem is from the stupidity of windows.
I did not read it
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
There was a time when developing for LyX did not involve flexing
muscles all day long. It was nice.
Indeed.
Georg
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I am not really against a renaming. But I'd like it to wait for a
while.
How long? Or more specifically: Why not now?
Georg
Georg Baum a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
There was a time when developing for LyX did not involve flexing
muscles all day long. It was nice.
Indeed.
Guys, you have to recognize that it's difficult for us also that we have
to fight for each and every feature and prove ourselves
Georg Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| I am not really against a renaming. But I'd like it to wait for a
| while.
|
| How long? Or more specifically: Why not now?
Mostly selfish reason.
Give this scons stuff to settle a bit and we will look at it.
When I
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 18:02, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guys, you have to recognize that it's difficult for us also that we have
to fight for each and every feature and prove ourselves each time.
I don't mind discussing myself (I probably enjoy it as it is a new
experience for me ;-)); but if
Jose' Matos a écrit :
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 18:02, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guys, you have to recognize that it's difficult for us also that we have
to fight for each and every feature and prove ourselves each time.
I don't mind discussing myself (I probably enjoy it as it is a new
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I understand all this, really. Nevertheless, maybe because of this bad
| past experience, I have the feeling that you (as a whole) are over
| protective with your baby. LyX is not a baby anymore, she is now a
| beautiful young lady that needs some
I was expecting that only the aspell.C file would be recompiled but I
see that everything is being recompiled (see attached scons_lyx.log), is
that normal, Bo?
That is because the whole commands that generate other files are also
changed, although others do not care about the added flags.
Bo
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I am not really against a renaming. But I'd like it to wait for a
while.
For instance, until the CT merge :-)
Michael
Bo Peng a écrit :
because I asked for aspell support when configuring (I presume that
it is not possible to have aspell at the moment).
Not now. Please wait till we have the basics done.
I think it is possible to have aspell with your new extra_inc_path1 and
extra_lib_path1, isn't it?
Bo Peng wrote:
> A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
> the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
> (I know, this leads to non-portability. but this is life).
So this is the answer to my offer to do the renaming on a rainy weekend?
Bo Peng a écrit :
Abdel said that scons is able to recognize .C files as C++ source
files on a native Windows environment. Why it is not able to do so
with cygwin?
I did not read that email in detail, what I know is that gcc tells the
content of a .c file and make itself g++ if the file is
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:32:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Bo Peng a écrit :
> >>because I asked for aspell support when configuring (I presume that
> >>it is not possible to have aspell at the moment).
> >
> >Not now. Please wait till we have the basics done.
>
> I think it is possible
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:32:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng a écrit :
because I asked for aspell support when configuring (I presume that
it is not possible to have aspell at the moment).
Not now. Please wait till we have the basics done.
I think it
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:43:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Bo Peng a écrit :
> >>Abdel said that scons is able to recognize .C files as C++ source
> >>files on a native Windows environment. Why it is not able to do so
> >>with cygwin?
> >
> >I did not read that email in detail, what I
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Could I suggest that you list the initial features that you want so that
| > scons stays in SVN?
|
| Lars wants an immediate replacement for autotools. That will not
| happen any time soon.
No. I want immediate proof that scons is _capable_ of replacing
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Bo Peng wrote:
>
> > A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
> > the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
> > (I know, this leads to non-portability. but this is life).
>
>
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:43:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng a écrit :
Abdel said that scons is able to recognize .C files as C++ source
files on a native Windows environment. Why it is not able to do so
with cygwin?
I did not read that email in
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:39:32AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Bo Peng wrote:
>>
>> > A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
>> > the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
>> > (I know, this leads to
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:52:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:32:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >>Bo Peng a écrit :
> because I asked for aspell support when configuring (I presume that
> it is not possible to have
Georg Baum a écrit :
(but I don't understand why we
need scons in 1.4 at all, since it is only a maintenance branch)
Agreed. We have already enough difficulty to let it stay in 1.5 so
please don't advocate 1.4.
Abdel.
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:39:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >Wait a moment Abdel. If scons is using gcc to compile .C files it means
> >that it is not able to recognize them as C++ sources.
>
> I confirm that Scons is using gcc and g++ to compile the .C
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:39:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
But gcc is used everywhere! I have removed 'win32' from the code above
and it works the same.
And you are using a native python, right?
Right.
I think these environment variable are simply
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:52:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 09:32:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Bo Peng a écrit :
because I asked for aspell support when configuring (I presume that
it is not
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:18:46PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Yep, actually I didn't need the xxx1 options because I only need aspell
> (what's this aiksaurus anyway??):
It's a thesaurus
http://aiksaurus.sourceforge.net/
--
Enrico
> Joost> If compilation with MSVC++ worked, the vcproj files would be
> Joost> very useful. However, there are still incompatibilities that
> Joost> break important things.
>
> It used to work. What is broken now?
Scons claims that it can generate vc project file so I think this is
an easier
On 5/9/06, Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:08:21AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> Vim is *the* editing tool for me. *You can tell from the first line of
> every SCons* files).
Why is this needed btw?
Can't you use autocmd for it?
I know, but when someone else is
When "scons install" works, I will look at making it part of my daily builds.
This is the easy part, and will be done shortly.
What are more difficult are scons dist, dist-clean, rpm etc, by which
autotools are proud of.
Bo
> A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
> the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
> (I know, this leads to non-portability. but this is life).
So this is the answer to my offer to do the renaming on a rainy weekend?
Good to know, if
No. I want immediate proof that scons is _capable_ of replacing
autotools. Huge difference.
Actually, I would like to free myself from the obligation of
challenging autotools. I personally believe that scons will evolve to
a state that can replace autotools without doubt, but it is not easy
to
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 16:51, Bo Peng wrote:
> I have no right to make such a big decision. I proposed a filename
> change and get "is your problem fixed?" reply. Namely, as long as lyx
> is working, such a big change is not welcome, especially when the
> source of the problem is from the
> So this is the answer to my offer to do the renaming on a rainy weekend?
> Good to know, if you continue like this you will save me some time because
> I don't need to read your posts anymore.
I can't speak for Bo, of course, but I think he had 1.4 in mind.
No, I only had 1.5 in mind. I was
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > No. I want immediate proof that scons is _capable_ of replacing
| > autotools. Huge difference.
|
| Actually, I would like to free myself from the obligation of
| challenging autotools. I personally believe that scons will evolve to
| a state that can
Bo Peng a écrit :
> A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
> the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
> (I know, this leads to non-portability. but this is life).
So this is the answer to my offer to do the renaming on a rainy
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Bo Peng a écrit :
| >> > A renaming of lyx .C files will never happen so we will have to use
| >> > the current solution, .i.e., force moc'ing, and force the use of g++
| >> > (I know, this leads to non-portability. but this is life).
| >>
| >>
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > No. I want immediate proof that scons is _capable_ of replacing
| > autotools. Huge difference.
|
| Actually, I would like to free myself from the obligation of
| challenging autotools. I personally believe that scons
> "Abdelrazak" == Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak> Come on guys, keep cool. Lars just agreed for Scons
Abdelrazak> presence in trunk... IMHO there's better things in life
Abdelrazak> than to fight for these little matters.
There was a time when developing for LyX did
Bo Peng wrote:
> I have no right to make such a big decision. I proposed a filename
> change and get "is your problem fixed?" reply. Namely, as long as lyx
> is working, such a big change is not welcome, especially when the
> source of the problem is from the stupidity of windows.
I did not read
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> There was a time when developing for LyX did not involve flexing
> muscles all day long. It was nice.
Indeed.
Georg
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I am not really against a renaming. But I'd like it to wait for a
> while.
How long? Or more specifically: Why not now?
Georg
Georg Baum a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
There was a time when developing for LyX did not involve flexing
muscles all day long. It was nice.
Indeed.
Guys, you have to recognize that it's difficult for us also that we have
to fight for each and every feature and prove ourselves
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > I am not really against a renaming. But I'd like it to wait for a
| > while.
|
| How long? Or more specifically: Why not now?
Mostly selfish reason.
Give this scons stuff to settle a bit and we will look at it.
When I
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 18:02, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Guys, you have to recognize that it's difficult for us also that we have
> to fight for each and every feature and prove ourselves each time.
> I don't mind discussing myself (I probably enjoy it as it is a new
> experience for me ;-));
Jose' Matos a écrit :
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 18:02, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Guys, you have to recognize that it's difficult for us also that we have
to fight for each and every feature and prove ourselves each time.
I don't mind discussing myself (I probably enjoy it as it is a new
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I understand all this, really. Nevertheless, maybe because of this bad
| past experience, I have the feeling that you (as a whole) are over
| protective with your baby. LyX is not a baby anymore, she is now a
| beautiful young lady that needs some
I was expecting that only the aspell.C file would be recompiled but I
see that everything is being recompiled (see attached scons_lyx.log), is
that normal, Bo?
That is because the whole commands that generate other files are also
changed, although others do not care about the added flags.
Bo
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
I am not really against a renaming. But I'd like it to wait for a
while.
For instance, until the CT merge :-)
Michael
Joost Verburg wrote:
If compilation with MSVC++ worked, the vcproj files would be very
useful. However, there are still incompatibilities that break important
things.
Note that compilation with MSVC++ worked fine some months ago (version 2003
aka 7, not 6, that one is simply broken), and that
Joost == Joost Verburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joost Andre Poenitz wrote:
Last time the Windows developers wanted to have .vcproj files. They
got them.
Joost If compilation with MSVC++ worked, the vcproj files would be
Joost very useful. However, there are still incompatibilities that
Joost
On Monday 08 May 2006 18:43, Bo Peng wrote:
That is quicker than ./configure but I agree that it is a concern. waf
claims that it can do better here (by cache previous thinking
process.)
I have seen you refer waf several times. Will those changes be merged in
upstream scons?
I read a
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak You should have said something then. Because without
Abdelrazak anyone saying anything it's difficult to get an idea. 3
Abdelrazak saying yes and 0 saying no... I think you get the picture.
Say what? please do not commit
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak John Levon a écrit :
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:19:29PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
scons: Configure: Checking for main() in C library nsl...
What is this nsl library?
It's networking functions on certain UNIX types
Georg Baum a écrit :
Joost Verburg wrote:
If compilation with MSVC++ worked, the vcproj files would be very
useful. However, there are still incompatibilities that break important
things.
Note that compilation with MSVC++ worked fine some months ago (version 2003
aka 7, not 6, that one is
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak You should have said something then. Because without
Abdelrazak anyone saying anything it's difficult to get an idea. 3
Abdelrazak saying yes and 0 saying no... I think you get the picture.
Say
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Georg Baum a écrit :
| Joost Verburg wrote:
|
| If compilation with MSVC++ worked, the vcproj files would be very
| useful. However, there are still incompatibilities that break important
| things.
| Note that compilation with MSVC++ worked fine
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Abdelrazak == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdelrazak John Levon a écrit :
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:19:29PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
scons: Configure: Checking for main() in C library nsl...
What is this nsl library?
It's networking
Abdel == Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Abdel I am repeating my self but it's a feature that touch
Abdel _nothing_ at the current tree. So I reckon it is special.
We'll see.
Abdel Bo have apologized already for this, could we please move
Abdel on?
It is not fair, I was away for
1 - 100 of 308 matches
Mail list logo
