Re: Failing tex2lyx test

On 03/13/2018 08:03 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > 2018-03-13 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko >: > > #0  strlen () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/strlen.S:106 > #1  0x7f5abf26043c in std::__cxx11::basic_string std::char_traits, std::allocator >::compare(char > const*

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

Am Dienstag, 13. März 2018 13:03:04 CET schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > 2018-03-13 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > > #0 strlen () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/strlen.S:106 > > #1 0x7f5abf26043c in std::__cxx11::basic_string > std::char_traits, std::allocator >::compare(char const*) const > > () > >

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

2018-03-13 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > #0 strlen () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/strlen.S:106 > #1 0x7f5abf26043c in std::__cxx11::basic_string std::char_traits, std::allocator >::compare(char const*) const > () > from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 > #2 0x005b403d in std::op

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

Am Dienstag, 13. März 2018 11:31:19 CET schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > 2018-03-13 10:15 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > > I see. The CJK.lyx is different here. > > An the CJK.tex is identical to minde? > > > Compiling now with a clean source tree. > > > > NOW, with qt4.8.7, I see a crash fro

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

2018-03-13 10:15 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > I see. The CJK.lyx is different here. > An the CJK.tex is identical to minde? > Compiling now with a clean source tree. > NOW, with qt4.8.7, I see a crash from tex2lyx. > Changing to qt5.6.1. Compiling. > No crash. Same problem as befo

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

Am Dienstag, 13. März 2018 08:57:42 CET schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > 2018-03-12 20:14 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > > Apparently you are testing lyx2.3.x. > > No, master, actually. The bugfix of the mentioned commit shows up, but not > the problem you face. See attached file. > > Jürgen I see. T

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

2018-03-12 20:14 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > Apparently you are testing lyx2.3.x. No, master, actually. The bugfix of the mentioned commit shows up, but not the problem you face. See attached file. Jürgen CJK.lyx Description: application/lyx %% LyX 2.4.0dev created this file. For more info, s

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

Am Montag, 12. März 2018 19:48:39 CET schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Montag, den 12.03.2018, 18:26 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Should do as in case of test-structure.tex > > > > cd src/tex2lyx/test > > ./runtests.py path-to-tex2lyx ../../../lib/scripts /tmp CJK.tex > > Did that, t

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

Am Montag, den 12.03.2018, 18:26 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Should do as in case of test-structure.tex > cd src/tex2lyx/test > ./runtests.py path-to-tex2lyx ../../../lib/scripts /tmp CJK.tex Did that, the result generated in /tmp looks good (does not show the problem you describe).

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

Am Montag, 12. März 2018 18:10:16 CET schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > 2018-03-12 16:05 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > > The problematic diff looks like: > > > > --- /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/tex2lyx/test/CJK.lyx.lyx Sun Mar 11 > > 19:35:25 > > 2018 > > +++ /BUI

Re: Failing tex2lyx test

2018-03-12 16:05 GMT+01:00 Kornel Benko : > The problematic diff looks like: > > --- /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/tex2lyx/test/CJK.lyx.lyx Sun Mar 11 > 19:35:25 > 2018 > +++ /BUILD/BUILDMint18/BuildLyxGitQt5.6.1local-gcc5.4.0/src/tex2lyx/test/ > CJK.lyx

Failing tex2lyx test

Lately, the test "tex2lyx/roundtrip/CJK.tex" fails. Bisecting and searching for the wrong looking diff led to *** 0f4c9027056a6f4f771382e9ebfc7940274bf5c0 is the first bad commit commit 0f4c9027056a6f4f771382e9ebfc7940274bf5c0 Author: Juergen Spitzmueller Date: Sat Mar 10 14:58:55 2018 +0100