Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Let's opt for the last one. Someone needs to push forward, why
Lars> not us.
Note that intl/locale.alias says
no_NO nb_NO.ISO-8859-1
no_NO.ISO-8859-1 nb_NO.ISO-8859-1
So it see
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Let's opt for the last one. Someone needs to push forward, why
Lars> not us.
Note that intl/locale.alias says
no_NO nb_NO.ISO-8859-1
no_NO.ISO-8859-1 nb_NO.ISO-8859-1
So it seems there is not much work to do...
JMa
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| >Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| >| No problem with gcc 4.0. No problem with my no.po file.
| > | | The problem is that the no_NO locale has been phased out,
| >| and replaced by nb_NO instead, for resons
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| No problem with gcc 4.0. No problem with my no.po file.
|
| The problem is that the no_NO locale has been phased out,
| and replaced by nb_NO instead, for resons political.
It is possible to dig up any references on this
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 11:16 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
No problem with gcc 4.0. No problem with my no.po file.
The problem is that the no_NO locale has been phased out,
and replaced by nb_NO instead, for resons political.
no_NO used to work anyway, as lyx could use
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I would say: (1) switch to nb, and (2) add documentation AND a note in
> the release notes. For some time (transition period) we could have a
> symlink no -> nb.
The symlink is a good idea. Not everybody updates immediately when a new
distro release is available, and we ce
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 11:16 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> No problem with gcc 4.0. No problem with my no.po file.
>
> The problem is that the no_NO locale has been phased out,
> and replaced by nb_NO instead, for resons political.
>
> no_NO used to work anyway, as lyx could use whatever
> locale
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| No problem with gcc 4.0. No problem with my no.po file.
|
| The problem is that the no_NO locale has been phased out,
| and replaced by nb_NO instead, for resons political.
It is possible to dig up any references on this issue?
No problem with gcc 4.0. No problem with my no.po file.
The problem is that the no_NO locale has been phased out,
and replaced by nb_NO instead, for resons political.
no_NO used to work anyway, as lyx could use whatever
locales it wanted. Something has changed, and now
only locales supported b
