Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 19 Mar 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | > > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > Lars> I disagree. We write the floats to support the float.sty package | > Lars> (or a better one if it exists) and the default floa

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> No, it isn't. Lars> [bth] == [htb] So it seems this is not a list of options, but a mere set. Where is this documented? Every description I found seems to assume that LaTeX tries the options one after the other... The only hi

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 19-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I disagree. We write the floats to support the float.sty package (or a > better one if it exists) and the default floats in LyX. We should not > add code to cope with packages/paramters that we have never heard of. > > If the user really needs that it

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread John Levon
On 19 Mar 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Lars> I disagree. We write the floats to support the float.sty package > Lars> (or a better one if it exists) and the default floats in LyX. We > Lars> should not add code to cope wi

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Juergen> On 19-Mar-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | >> The problem I see is that we are supposed to be able to provide a | >> _string_ of htbp, not just one value. How do you pla

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> I disagree. We write the floats to support the float.sty package | Lars> (or a better one if it exists) and the default floats in LyX. We | Lars> should not add code to co

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> I disagree. We write the floats to support the float.sty package Lars> (or a better one if it exists) and the default floats in LyX. We Lars> should not add code to cope with packages/paramters that we have Lars> never heard of

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On 19-Mar-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> The problem I see is that we are supposed to be able to provide a >> _string_ of htbp, not just one value. How do you plan to implement >> that? I cannot think of a good UI for that

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 19-Mar-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: | | > The problem I see is that we are supposed to be able to provide a | > _string_ of htbp, not just one value. How do you plan to implement | > that? I cannot think of a good UI for that, except maybe a lis

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> First hack at creating a FormFloat (FormSingleFloat?) it should | Lars> probably have a "Use Default" also for plac

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 19-Mar-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > The problem I see is that we are supposed to be able to provide a > _string_ of htbp, not just one value. How do you plan to implement > that? I cannot think of a good UI for that, except maybe a list of > common reasonable option, to which we add a "

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> First hack at creating a FormFloat (FormSingleFloat?) it should Lars> probably have a "Use Default" also for placement. The problem I see is that we are supposed to be able to

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 19-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | >| Why you just don't have to force one of the buttons and so it is | >| default! | | > I don't get your meaning. | > ! == force | > h == here | > t == top | > b == bottom | > p == page | > H == Her

RE: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 17-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > First hack at creating a FormFloat (FormSingleFloat?) > > it should probably have a "Use Default" also for placement. Why you just don't have to force one of the buttons and so it is default! We probably need somethin

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 17-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > First hack at creating a FormFloat (FormSingleFloat?) | > | > it should probably have a "Use Default" also for placement. | | Why you just don't have to forc

Re: FormFloat

2001-03-19 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 19-Mar-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >| Why you just don't have to force one of the buttons and so it is >| default! > I don't get your meaning. > ! == force > h == here > t == top > b == bottom > p == page > H == Here (and nowhere else) If none of the above is selected it's the de

FormFloat

2001-03-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
First hack at creating a FormFloat (FormSingleFloat?) it should probably have a "Use Default" also for placement. Lgb FormFloat.fd