On 09-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote:
This seems the nicest solution (?). Alternatively a static init() method
could be added to GUIRunTime ?
Done! And tested for xforms, kde AND gnome :)
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna
Juergen, Gnome implementation has a tiny bug: the strings app_id and
app_version should be static too due to a "feature" of Gnome--.
Marko
On 09-Sep-2000 John Levon wrote:
>
> This seems the nicest solution (?). Alternatively a static init() method
> could be added to GUIRunTime ?
>
Done! And tested for xforms, kde AND gnome :)
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen
Juergen, Gnome implementation has a tiny bug: the strings app_id and
app_version should be static too due to a "feature" of Gnome--.
Marko
Hi, we still have gui code in main.C
My question is what would break if this was moved into the ctor
for LyXGUI, making GUIRuntime a non-static, with LyXGUI storing a pointer
to it ?
Would the Gnome stuff break ? Marko ?
This seems the nicest solution (?). Alternatively a static init() method
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
My question is what would break if this was moved into the ctor
for LyXGUI, making GUIRuntime a non-static, with LyXGUI storing a pointer
to it ?
Would the Gnome stuff break ? Marko ?
no problem. it should be very similar to kde.
marko
Hi, we still have gui code in main.C
My question is what would break if this was moved into the ctor
for LyXGUI, making GUIRuntime a non-static, with LyXGUI storing a pointer
to it ?
Would the Gnome stuff break ? Marko ?
This seems the nicest solution (?). Alternatively a static init() method
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, John Levon wrote:
> My question is what would break if this was moved into the ctor
> for LyXGUI, making GUIRuntime a non-static, with LyXGUI storing a pointer
> to it ?
>
> Would the Gnome stuff break ? Marko ?
no problem. it should be very similar to kde.
marko
