On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 08:18:05PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:51:26PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:13:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:23:28PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
What about deciding that
On 9/25/07, Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrmpf.
I have results different from yours. I ran three times the commands
and took the lowest real value. Note that user and sys values
practically didn't change between runs.
How much memory do your sun and linux boxes have? In my
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:10:29PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
On 9/25/07, Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hrmpf.
I have results different from yours. I ran three times the commands
and took the lowest real value. Note that user and sys values
practically didn't change
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 08:18:05PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:51:26PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:13:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:23:28PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > > What about
On 9/25/07, Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hrmpf.
>
> I have results different from yours. I ran three times the commands
> and took the lowest "real" value. Note that "user" and "sys" values
> practically didn't change between runs.
How much memory do your sun and linux boxes
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 09:10:29PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hrmpf.
> >
> > I have results different from yours. I ran three times the commands
> > and took the lowest "real" value. Note that "user" and "sys" values
> >
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:51:26PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:13:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:23:28PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
What about deciding that we do not install the libraries? Of course,
this would imply
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 03:51:26PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:13:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:23:28PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > > What about deciding that we do not install the libraries? Of course,
> > > > this
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes. We can do that. Should even. Tell me what to do...
First, replace all instances of pkglib_LTLIBRARIES by
noinst_LTLIBRARIES.
I did not find where you set static/shared depending on the platform,
but you should add a test for '$lyx_devel_version =
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:13:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:23:28PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
What about deciding that we do not install the libraries? Of course,
this would imply that an installable LyX is a static one, but I am not
sure we care much
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes. We can do that. Should even. Tell me what to do...
First, replace all instances of pkglib_LTLIBRARIES by
noinst_LTLIBRARIES.
I did not find where you set static/shared depending on the platform,
but you should add a test for '$lyx_devel_version =
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 02:13:55AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:23:28PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > > What about deciding that we do not install the libraries? Of course,
> > > this would imply that an installable LyX is a static one, but I am not
> > > sure we
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I remember that Lars had some good numbers when he wanted to push
pch.
I have good numbers when I want to push something as well...
Now that you talk about you pushing something: with your changes to
allow building with shared libraries, the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 10:32:54AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I remember that Lars had some good numbers when he wanted to push
pch.
I have good numbers when I want to push something as well...
Now that you talk about you pushing
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 10:32:54AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I remember that Lars had some good numbers when he wanted to push
pch.
I have good numbers when I want to push something as well...
Now that you talk about you pushing
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:23:28PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
What about deciding that we do not install the libraries? Of course,
this would imply that an installable LyX is a static one, but I am not
sure we care much about distributing dynamic versions anyway. We could
for example
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But I remember that Lars had some good numbers when he wanted to push
>> pch.
>
> I have good numbers when I want to push something as well...
Now that you talk about you pushing something: with your changes to
allow building with shared libraries,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 10:32:54AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> But I remember that Lars had some good numbers when he wanted to push
> >> pch.
> >
> > I have good numbers when I want to push something as well...
>
> Now that you talk
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 10:32:54AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> But I remember that Lars had some good numbers when he wanted to push
> >> pch.
> >
> > I have good numbers when I want to push something as well...
>
> Now that you talk
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 02:23:28PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > What about deciding that we do not install the libraries? Of course,
> > this would imply that an installable LyX is a static one, but I am not
> > sure we care much about distributing dynamic versions anyway. We could
> > for
20 matches
Mail list logo
