Re: Long mails

2001-04-22 Thread Amir Karger
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:47:58PM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote: Is this a sample mail from Andre to show us how long a message he is willing to tolerate? Seriously, just send me a note when you guys agreed on some limit. I would vote more than 50K, if not all the way to 500. An Allan-length

Re: Long mails

2001-04-22 Thread Amir Karger
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:47:58PM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote: > Is this a sample mail from Andre to show us how long a message he is > willing to tolerate? > > Seriously, just send me a note when you guys agreed on some limit. I would vote more than 50K, if not all the way to 500. An

Re: Long mails

2001-04-19 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Mate Wierdl wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:32:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all the time... If there is a need, I can

Re: Long mails

2001-04-19 Thread Andre Poenitz

Re: Long mails

2001-04-19 Thread Mate Wierdl
Is this a sample mail from Andre to show us how long a message he is willing to tolerate? Seriously, just send me a note when you guys agreed on some limit. Mate On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:32:31AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:

Re: Long mails

2001-04-19 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Mate Wierdl wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:32:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to > > the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all > > the time... > > If there is a

Re: Long mails

2001-04-19 Thread Andre Poenitz

Re: Long mails

2001-04-19 Thread Mate Wierdl
Is this a sample mail from Andre to show us how long a message he is willing to tolerate? Seriously, just send me a note when you guys agreed on some limit. Mate On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:32:31AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:

Re: Long mails

2001-04-18 Thread Mate Wierdl
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:32:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all the time... If there is a need, I can certainly restrict the size of the posts.

Re: Long mails

2001-04-18 Thread Mate Wierdl
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:32:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to > the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all > the time... If there is a need, I can certainly restrict the size of the posts.

Long mails

2001-04-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all the time... Andre' -- Andr Pnitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Long mails

2001-04-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to | the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all | the time... What's the limit on a "large" mail? 1k 10k 100k? 1M? -- Lgb

Long mails

2001-04-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all the time... Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Long mails

2001-04-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to | the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all | the time... What's the limit on a "large" mail? 1k 10k 100k? 1M? -- Lgb