Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-23 Thread Georg Baum
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Development of new features and/or fixes that can wait for LyX 2.1.x, or 2.2.0, can take place in the new features repository. IMHO it would be very good to concentrate on 2.1.0 and not to work on 2.2 or 2.1.x stuff at all until 2.1.0 is released. Otherwise it

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-23 Thread Georg Baum
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Development of new features and/or fixes that can wait for LyX 2.1.x, or > 2.2.0, can take place in the new features repository. IMHO it would be very good to concentrate on 2.1.0 and not to work on 2.2 or 2.1.x stuff at all until 2.1.0 is released. Otherwise it

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-22 Thread Jerry
On May 21, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Dear all, It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's Meeting and is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the first beta of LyX 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime, the last

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-22 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? Jerry I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new feature or just a bugfix ? Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? Jerry I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new feature or just a bugfix ? I guess this is the patch from pdv we discussed in

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 21.05.2013 10:32, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Please have a look at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; and help to complete the list of new features as much as possible. Maybe Uwe would also appreciate some help to document the new features. Please don't add anything to the

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-22 Thread Jerry
On May 22, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: 22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? Jerry I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new feature or just a

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-22 Thread Jerry
On May 21, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Dear all, > > It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's Meeting and > is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the first beta of LyX > 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime, the

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-22 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? Jerry I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new feature or just a bugfix ? Vincent

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn: Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? Jerry I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new feature or just a bugfix ? I guess this is the patch from pdv we discussed in

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 21.05.2013 10:32, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Please have a look at "http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; and help to complete the list of new features as much as possible. Maybe Uwe would also appreciate some help to document the new features. Please don't add anything to the

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-22 Thread Jerry
On May 22, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > 22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn: >> Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef: >>> >>> The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included? >>> Jerry >> >> I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new >>

LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-21 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Dear all, It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's Meeting and is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the first beta of LyX 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime, the last topics can be finished, the documentation can be updated, the

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-21 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being prepared for LyX2.1) I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. Next thing I would like to do after string freeze is to go through all new strings and check their

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-21 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being prepared for LyX2.1) I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. Next thing I would like to do

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-21 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being prepared for LyX2.1) I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. Is there any urgency to do this

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-21 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Also if you are heading towards final freezing it would be nicer if we know the time schedule sooner than 2 weeks ahead. Yes, a nice schedule is always better. On the other hand, if people do have new features that they definitely want to have in 2.1, they

LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-21 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Dear all, It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's Meeting and is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the first beta of LyX 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime, the last topics can be finished, the documentation can be updated, the

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-21 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being > prepared for LyX2.1) I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. Next thing I would like to do after string freeze is to go through all new strings and check their

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-21 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being > > prepared for LyX2.1) > > I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. > > Next thing I would

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-21 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being > > prepared for LyX2.1) > > I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files. > Is there any urgency to

Re: LyX 2.1 beta 1: due in two weeks

2013-05-21 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > Also if you are heading towards final freezing it would be nicer if we know > > the time schedule sooner than 2 weeks ahead. > > > Yes, a nice schedule is always better. On the other hand, if people do have > new features that they definitely want to have in 2.1,