Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Development of new features and/or fixes that can wait for LyX 2.1.x, or
2.2.0, can take place in the new features repository.
IMHO it would be very good to concentrate on 2.1.0 and not to work on 2.2 or
2.1.x stuff at all until 2.1.0 is released. Otherwise it
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Development of new features and/or fixes that can wait for LyX 2.1.x, or
> 2.2.0, can take place in the new features repository.
IMHO it would be very good to concentrate on 2.1.0 and not to work on 2.2 or
2.1.x stuff at all until 2.1.0 is released. Otherwise it
On May 21, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Dear all,
It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's Meeting and
is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the first beta of LyX
2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime, the last
Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef:
The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included?
Jerry
I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new
feature or just a bugfix ?
Vincent
22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef:
The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included?
Jerry
I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new
feature or just a bugfix ?
I guess this is the patch from pdv we discussed in
Am 21.05.2013 10:32, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Please have a look at http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; and help to complete
the list of new
features as much as possible. Maybe Uwe would also appreciate some help to
document the new features.
Please don't add anything to the
On May 22, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef:
The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included?
Jerry
I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new
feature or just a
On May 21, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's Meeting and
> is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the first beta of LyX
> 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime, the
Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef:
The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included?
Jerry
I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new
feature or just a bugfix ?
Vincent
22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef:
The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included?
Jerry
I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new
feature or just a bugfix ?
I guess this is the patch from pdv we discussed in
Am 21.05.2013 10:32, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Please have a look at "http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21; and help to complete
the list of new
features as much as possible. Maybe Uwe would also appreciate some help to
document the new features.
Please don't add anything to the
On May 22, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> 22/05/2013 10:15, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>> Op 22-5-2013 9:29, Jerry schreef:
>>>
>>> The recent work to correct slow scrolling is not included?
>>> Jerry
>>
>> I'm not sure I know which work you mean. Besides, is this really a new
>>
Dear all,
It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's
Meeting and is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the
first beta of LyX 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime,
the last topics can be finished, the documentation can be updated, the
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
(I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being
prepared for LyX2.1)
I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files.
Next thing I would like to do after string freeze is to go through all new
strings and check their
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
(I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being
prepared for LyX2.1)
I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files.
Next thing I would like to do
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
(I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being
prepared for LyX2.1)
I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files.
Is there any urgency to do this
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Also if you are heading towards final freezing it would be nicer if we know
the time schedule sooner than 2 weeks ahead.
Yes, a nice schedule is always better. On the other hand, if people do have
new features that they definitely want to have in 2.1, they
Dear all,
It seems that the current master has survived the Lyx Developer's
Meeting and is still in good shape. Therefore, I intend to release the
first beta of LyX 2.1 during the first weekend of June. In the meantime,
the last topics can be finished, the documentation can be updated, the
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being
> prepared for LyX2.1)
I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files.
Next thing I would like to do after string freeze is to go through all new
strings and check their
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being
> > prepared for LyX2.1)
>
> I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files.
>
> Next thing I would
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > (I will send a separate mail about which topics I know that are being
> > prepared for LyX2.1)
>
> I plan to finish the cleanup of includes in our headers/cpp files.
>
Is there any urgency to
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> > Also if you are heading towards final freezing it would be nicer if we know
> > the time schedule sooner than 2 weeks ahead.
> >
> Yes, a nice schedule is always better. On the other hand, if people do have
> new features that they definitely want to have in 2.1,
22 matches
Mail list logo