Re: old lyx document in lyx 2.3.6 doesn't compile

On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:48 AM Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 14/09/2022 à 19:16, Csikos Bela a écrit : > > Hello: > > > > I have an old document I made in lyx 2.0. Lyx 2.3.6.1 opens is but > > interprets the code incorrectly and gives compilation error: > > Hello, > > Could you please

LyX 2.3.6 Windows Installer

As noted in the announcement of LyX 2.3.6, there is now an updated installer available for Windows, including a 64 bit version. In order to update to 2.3.6 on Windows using the new installer, you should uninstall the previous 2.3 releases using the uninstaller or from within the control panel

LyX 2.3.6 Released

We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.3.6. This is the sixth maintenance release in the 2.3.x series. It is the result of on-going efforts to make our stable version more reliable and more stable. Most of the changes are fairly minor, fixes of smallish bugs, but a couple crashes have

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On 11/30/20 2:36 PM, Yu Jin wrote: Am Mo., 30. Nov. 2020 um 19:16 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: On 11/30/20 12:42 PM, Yu Jin wrote: Am Mo., 30. Nov. 2020 um 09:09 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes mailto:lasgout...@lyx.org>>: Le 30/11/2020 à

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

Am Mo., 30. Nov. 2020 um 19:16 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > On 11/30/20 12:42 PM, Yu Jin wrote: > > Am Mo., 30. Nov. 2020 um 09:09 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes < > lasgout...@lyx.org>: > >> Le 30/11/2020 à 06:39, Yu Jin a écrit : >> > The compile instructions for

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On 11/30/20 12:42 PM, Yu Jin wrote: Am Mo., 30. Nov. 2020 um 09:09 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes mailto:lasgout...@lyx.org>>: Le 30/11/2020 à 06:39, Yu Jin a écrit : > The compile instructions for Windows in master branch are pretty > accurate. The instructions on how to build

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

Am Mo., 30. Nov. 2020 um 09:09 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes < lasgout...@lyx.org>: > Le 30/11/2020 à 06:39, Yu Jin a écrit : > > The compile instructions for Windows in master branch are pretty > > accurate. The instructions on how to build the installer are also pretty > > accurate, they say

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On Sunday, November 29, 2020 9:54:51 PM WET Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > No, it was fixed earlier at 7bb08f10. We do not violate the ODR anymore > in 2.4 (and it is a good thing). That is nice to know. And I did not remember to seen them while compiling the development version. But then usually

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

Le 30/11/2020 à 06:39, Yu Jin a écrit : The compile instructions for Windows in master branch are pretty accurate. The instructions on how to build the installer are also pretty accurate, they say which plugins for NSIS to install and even describe how to update the dependencies (imagemagick,

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

Am Mo., 30. Nov. 2020 um 01:18 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > On 11/29/20 1:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:05:04AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Works well here too, I will build betainstallers tomorrow. > >>> You think we

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On 11/28/20 10:48 AM, Yu Jin wrote: Am Sa., 28. Nov. 2020 um 16:05 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: On 11/28/20 3:01 AM, Yu Jin wrote: Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 23:48 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: On 11/27/20 2:09

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On 11/29/20 1:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:05:04AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Works well here too, I will build betainstallers tomorrow. You think we are far enough along just to make yours the official ones? Yes, just didn't expect it to happen

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

Le 27/11/2020 à 22:14, José Abílio Matos a écrit : While compiling this on F33 I noticed this warning: client.cpp:73:8: warning: type 'struct LyXRC' violates the C++ One Definition Rule [-Wodr]    73 | struct LyXRC {   |    ^ ../support/./../LyXRC.h:37:7: note: a different type

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:05:04AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > >> Works well here too, I will build betainstallers tomorrow. > > > > You think we are far enough along just to make yours the official > > ones? > > > > Yes, just didn't expect it to happen in 2.3.x. > > I think

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

Am Sa., 28. Nov. 2020 um 16:05 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > On 11/28/20 3:01 AM, Yu Jin wrote: > > Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 23:48 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < > rikih...@lyx.org>: > >> On 11/27/20 2:09 PM, Yu Jin wrote: >> >> Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 19:33 Uhr

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On 11/28/20 3:01 AM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 23:48 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: > > On 11/27/20 2:09 PM, Yu Jin wrote: >> Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 19:33 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda >> mailto:sa...@lyx.org>>: >> >> On Fri, Nov 27,

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 23:48 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > On 11/27/20 2:09 PM, Yu Jin wrote: > > Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 19:33 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda : > >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:29:32PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> > Are here: >> > >> >

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On 11/27/20 2:09 PM, Yu Jin wrote: Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 19:33 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda >: On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:29:32PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Are here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On Friday, November 27, 2020 5:29:32 PM WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Are here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ > > Please let me know if there are any problems, and please prepare > binaries. Thanks, as always, to those who do that work, Stephan, Eugene, > and Enrico, and to

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On Friday, November 27, 2020 5:29:32 PM WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Are here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ > > Please let me know if there are any problems, and please prepare > binaries. Thanks, as always, to those who do that work, Stephan, Eugene, > and Enrico, and to

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 19:33 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda : > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:29:32PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > Are here: > > > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ > > > > Please let me know if there are any problems, and please prepare > binaries. > > Thanks, as

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:29:32PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Are here: > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ > > Please let me know if there are any problems, and please prepare binaries. > Thanks, as always, to those who do that work, Stephan, Eugene, and Enrico, > and to

LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

Are here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ Please let me know if there are any problems, and please prepare binaries. Thanks, as always, to those who do that work, Stephan, Eugene, and Enrico, and to all those both inside and outside the LyX team who produce RPMs, etc. Riki --

Re: LyX 2.3.6

José, I'll probably just upgrade LyX on the Macs I support :-)-O greetings, el On 2020-10-30 11:27 , José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Friday, October 30, 2020 6:44:58 AM WET Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote: > >> Riki, > >> > >> can you make it read 2.4 format? > >> > >> > >> el > > > We reserve

Re: LyX 2.3.6

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:03:58PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Hi, all, > > Now that the development testing release is all but out, it is probably > also time to do another 2.3.x release. We have a few crash fixes, and > the last release was in June. So: Anything anyone wants to get

Re: LyX 2.3.6

Le 29/10/2020 à 23:03, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Hi, all, Now that the development testing release is all but out, it is probably also time to do another 2.3.x release. We have a few crash fixes, and the last release was in June. So: Anything anyone wants to get into 2.3.6 before we

Re: LyX 2.3.6

On Friday, October 30, 2020 6:44:58 AM WET Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote: > Riki, > > can you make it read 2.4 format? > > > el We reserve that for the final 2.3.x version. The rationale is that we just know what is the 2.4 file format after it is released. Of course that as soon as we enter the

Re: LyX 2.3.6

Riki, can you make it read 2.4 format? el On 2020-10-30 00:03 , Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Hi, all, > > Now that the development testing release is all but out, it is probably > also time to do another 2.3.x release. We have a few crash fixes, and > the last release was in June. So:

Re: LyX 2.3.6

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 09:09:24PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 10/29/20 8:39 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:03:58PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > >> So: Anything anyone wants to get into > >> 2.3.6 before we freeze strings? > > Can I backport

Re: LyX 2.3.6

On 10/29/20 8:39 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:03:58PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > >> So: Anything anyone wants to get into >> 2.3.6 before we freeze strings? > Can I backport fe1cbc06 and 334552ad to 2.3.x? I think that Kornel and I > are the only ones who use

Re: LyX 2.3.6

On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 06:03:58PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > So: Anything anyone wants to get into > 2.3.6 before we freeze strings? Can I backport fe1cbc06 and 334552ad to 2.3.x? I think that Kornel and I are the only ones who use the cpack deb feature. Scott signature.asc

LyX 2.3.6

Hi, all, Now that the development testing release is all but out, it is probably also time to do another 2.3.x release. We have a few crash fixes, and the last release was in June. So: Anything anyone wants to get into 2.3.6 before we freeze strings? A couple bugs that have only been fixed in