Liviu Andronic wrote:
Shouldn't we follow up on this idea? lyx.org is being systematically
brought down by users eager to try out LyX, and it would be a good
idea to have a server (or at least a mirror) that can cope with spikes
in demand.
systematically? i remember once, when 2.0.0 was
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Pavel Sanda sa...@lyx.org wrote:
systematically? i remember once, when 2.0.0 was announced. otherwise
i have hard time to remember when this happened.
Personally I have stumbled upon an unresponsive server several times,
not only around releases, but I also hear
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Shouldn't we follow up on this idea? lyx.org is being systematically
> brought down by users eager to try out LyX, and it would be a good
> idea to have a server (or at least a mirror) that can cope with spikes
> in demand.
systematically? i remember once, when 2.0.0 was
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> systematically? i remember once, when 2.0.0 was announced. otherwise
> i have hard time to remember when this happened.
>
Personally I have stumbled upon an unresponsive server several times,
not only around releases, but I also
Dear all
Shouldn't we follow up on this idea? lyx.org is being systematically
brought down by users eager to try out LyX, and it would be a good
idea to have a server (or at least a mirror) that can cope with spikes
in demand.
Any reasons not to do this?
Liviu
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:17 PM,
Dear all
Shouldn't we follow up on this idea? lyx.org is being systematically
brought down by users eager to try out LyX, and it would be a good
idea to have a server (or at least a mirror) that can cope with spikes
in demand.
Any reasons not to do this?
Liviu
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:17 PM,