Am 07.11.2010 um 22:19 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
To be clear: the bug is in 4.6.3 present too.
That's why the patch is needed...
Stephan
Which bug are we talking about here ?
The bug is described in ticket #6706.
It's not in LyX, it's in Qt - therefore the LyX ticket
was closed.
To be clear: the bug is in 4.6.3 present too.
That's why the patch is needed...
Stephan
Which bug are we talking about here ?
The bug is described in ticket #6706.
It's not in LyX, it's in Qt - therefore the LyX ticket
was closed. But the problem is real.
Stephan
I would have left
Am 08.11.2010 um 09:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
To be clear: the bug is in 4.6.3 present too.
That's why the patch is needed...
Stephan
Which bug are we talking about here ?
The bug is described in ticket #6706.
It's not in LyX, it's in Qt - therefore the LyX ticket
was
Yes, later.
But read Bennetts mail in this thread.
Ah yes, sorry.
He says it works. At the cost of nasty font render problems. These were
already
discussed. It depends on the display font how bad the rendering is. The root
cause
may be that the text fragment passed to Qt string draw
Am 08.11.2010 um 09:49 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
... At the cost of nasty font render problems. These were already
discussed. It depends on the display font how bad the rendering is. The root
cause
may be that the text fragment passed to Qt string draw differs from
the text
These problems need to get fixed ;).
Yes. I don't know how difficult it is.
I can tell you when I know what causes it ;).
BTW, is this a problem only on Mac OSX platform?
Well, I haven't seen this yet, so I guess.
Vincent
Am 07.11.2010 um 22:19 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>> To be clear: the bug is in 4.6.3 present too.
>> That's why the patch is needed...
>>
>> Stephan
>>
>
> Which bug are we talking about here ?
The bug is described in ticket #6706.
It's not in LyX, it's in Qt - therefore the LyX ticket
>>> To be clear: the bug is in 4.6.3 present too.
>>> That's why the patch is needed...
>>>
>>> Stephan
>>>
>>
>> Which bug are we talking about here ?
>
> The bug is described in ticket #6706.
> It's not in LyX, it's in Qt - therefore the LyX ticket
> was closed. But the problem is real.
>
>
Am 08.11.2010 um 09:34 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
To be clear: the bug is in 4.6.3 present too.
That's why the patch is needed...
Stephan
>>>
>>> Which bug are we talking about here ?
>>
>> The bug is described in ticket #6706.
>> It's not in LyX, it's in Qt -
> Yes, later.
> But read Bennetts mail in this thread.
Ah yes, sorry.
> He says it works. At the cost of nasty font render problems. These were
> already
> discussed. It depends on the display font how bad the rendering is. The root
> cause
> may be that the text fragment passed to Qt string
Am 08.11.2010 um 09:49 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>> ... At the cost of nasty font render problems. These were already
>> discussed. It depends on the display font how bad the rendering is. The root
>> cause
>> may be that the text fragment passed to Qt string draw differs from
>> the text
>> These problems need to get fixed ;).
>
> Yes. I don't know how difficult it is.
I can tell you when I know what causes it ;).
> BTW, is this a problem only on Mac OSX platform?
>
Well, I haven't seen this yet, so I guess.
Vincent
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:27 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote:
Hi there,
My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not impressed so
far
by MacOS so called legendary user friendlyness but I am trying to get
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:27 PM, BH bewih...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote:
Hi there,
My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not impressed so
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote:
Mac user friendliness is an acquired taste.
Just as Windows or any other desktop then :-)
But it seems that MacOS wants to impose me a way of working and I really
don't like it. I find it particularly irritating that I
Am 06.11.2010 um 23:27 schrieb BH:
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote:
Hi there,
My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not impressed so far
by MacOS so called legendary user friendlyness but I am trying to get used
to it right now.
The
Am 07.11.2010 um 10:58 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote:
Mac user friendliness is an acquired taste.
Just as Windows or any other desktop then :-)
But it seems that MacOS wants to impose me a way of working and I really
don't
Le 7 nov. 10 à 10:21, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
But it seems that MacOS wants to impose me a way of working and I
really don't like it.
I find it particularly irritating that I cannot maximize all windows
the same way.
Safari for example only maximizes vertically. I hope LyX is not
doing
On 07/11/2010 10:58, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Abdelrazak Younesyou...@lyx.org wrote:
Mac user friendliness is an acquired taste.
Just as Windows or any other desktop then :-)
But it seems that MacOS wants to impose me a way of working and I really
Stephan Witt wrote:
I'm using
* self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
into INSTALL.MacOSX?
p
Am 07.11.2010 um 19:52 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I'm using
* self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
into INSTALL.MacOSX?
What exactly?
It's described there already how to make a self compiled Qt library.
Regarding the patch - the link is in
Stephan Witt wrote:
I'm using
* self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
into INSTALL.MacOSX?
What exactly?
we suggest to use lyx with qt 4.6.2?
p
Am 07.11.2010 um 21:54 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I'm using
* self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
into INSTALL.MacOSX?
What exactly?
we suggest to use lyx with qt 4.6.2?
Ah ok, it doesn't make a difference AFAICS.
4.6.2 is working well too
Am 07.11.2010 um 22:02 schrieb Stephan Witt:
Am 07.11.2010 um 21:54 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I'm using
* self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
into INSTALL.MacOSX?
What exactly?
we suggest to use lyx with qt 4.6.2?
Ah ok, it doesn't
To be clear: the bug is in 4.6.3 present too.
That's why the patch is needed...
Stephan
Which bug are we talking about here ?
Vincent
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 07.11.2010 um 19:52 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
Stephan Witt wrote:
I'm using
* self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
into INSTALL.MacOSX?
What exactly?
It's described there already how to make a
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:27 PM, BH wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not impressed so
> far
> > by MacOS so called legendary user friendlyness but I am
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:27 PM, BH wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> > Hi there,
>> > My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Mac user friendliness is an acquired taste.
>
> Just as Windows or any other desktop then :-)
> But it seems that MacOS wants to impose me a way of working and I really
> don't like it. I find it particularly irritating
Am 06.11.2010 um 23:27 schrieb BH:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not impressed so far
>> by MacOS so called legendary user friendlyness but I am trying to get used
>> to it right
Am 07.11.2010 um 10:58 schrieb Liviu Andronic:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>>> Mac user friendliness is an acquired taste.
>>
>> Just as Windows or any other desktop then :-)
>> But it seems that MacOS wants to impose me a way of working and I
Le 7 nov. 10 à 10:21, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
But it seems that MacOS wants to impose me a way of working and I
really don't like it.
I find it particularly irritating that I cannot maximize all windows
the same way.
Safari for example only maximizes vertically. I hope LyX is not
doing
On 07/11/2010 10:58, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Mac user friendliness is an acquired taste.
Just as Windows or any other desktop then :-)
But it seems that MacOS wants to impose me a way of working and I really
Stephan Witt wrote:
> I'm using
> * self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
into INSTALL.MacOSX?
p
Am 07.11.2010 um 19:52 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
>> I'm using
>> * self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
>
> into INSTALL.MacOSX?
What exactly?
It's described there already how to make a self compiled Qt library.
Regarding the patch - the link is
Stephan Witt wrote:
> >> I'm using
> >> * self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
> >
> > into INSTALL.MacOSX?
>
> What exactly?
we suggest to use lyx with qt 4.6.2?
p
Am 07.11.2010 um 21:54 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> Stephan Witt wrote:
I'm using
* self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
>>>
>>> into INSTALL.MacOSX?
>>
>> What exactly?
>
> we suggest to use lyx with qt 4.6.2?
Ah ok, it doesn't make a difference AFAICS.
4.6.2
Am 07.11.2010 um 22:02 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 07.11.2010 um 21:54 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
> I'm using
> * self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
into INSTALL.MacOSX?
>>>
>>> What exactly?
>>
>> we suggest to use lyx with qt
> To be clear: the bug is in 4.6.3 present too.
> That's why the patch is needed...
>
> Stephan
>
Which bug are we talking about here ?
Vincent
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>
> Am 07.11.2010 um 19:52 schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> I'm using
>>> * self compiled Qt 4.6.3 library (because of #6706 is fixed then)
>>
>> into INSTALL.MacOSX?
>
> What exactly?
>
> It's described there
Hi there,
My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not impressed so far
by MacOS so called legendary user friendlyness but I am trying to get used
to it right now.
Anyway, I need to install development stuff. I've downloaded latest XCode
and Qt SDK. Now I need to know if I'd better
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote:
Hi there,
My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not impressed so far
by MacOS so called legendary user friendlyness but I am trying to get used
to it right now.
Anyway, I need to install development stuff.
Hi there,
My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not impressed so far
by MacOS so called legendary user friendlyness but I am trying to get used
to it right now.
Anyway, I need to install development stuff. I've downloaded latest XCode
and Qt SDK. Now I need to know if I'd better
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Hi there,
> My employer just got me a brand new MacBook Pro. I am not impressed so far
> by MacOS so called legendary user friendlyness but I am trying to get used
> to it right now.
> Anyway, I need to install development
44 matches
Mail list logo