Re: OS/2 compile

2000-02-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Allan" == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Allan On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Shigeru Miyata wrote: [...] Sorry if this is already fixed. src/Makefile.am lists bmtable.c while there is only bmtable.C which cannot be Allan I'm sure JMarc has already fixed this in CVS. I think I did. P.S. Is

Re: OS/2 compile

2000-02-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 08-Feb-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Allan gcc-2.8.x should work although it hasn't been tested, JMarc? Allan There may need to be a few minor fixes to libsigc++. I have not yet tried to checkout your work. BTW, what is the best way to checkout a tagged version of lyx-devel under

Re: OS/2 compile

2000-02-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
"Juergen" == Juergen Vigna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Juergen On 08-Feb-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Allan gcc-2.8.x should work although it hasn't been tested, JMarc? Allan There may need to be a few minor fixes to libsigc++. I have not yet tried to checkout your work. BTW, what is the

Re: OS/2 compile

2000-02-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Shigeru Miyata wrote: [...] >> Sorry if this is already fixed. src/Makefile.am lists bmtable.c >> while there is only bmtable.C which cannot be Allan> I'm sure JMarc has already fixed this in CVS. I think I did.

Re: OS/2 compile

2000-02-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 08-Feb-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Allan> gcc-2.8.x should work although it hasn't been tested, JMarc? > Allan> There may need to be a few minor fixes to libsigc++. > > I have not yet tried to checkout your work. BTW, what is the best way > to checkout a tagged version of lyx-devel

Re: OS/2 compile

2000-02-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On 08-Feb-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Allan> gcc-2.8.x should work although it hasn't been tested, JMarc? Allan> There may need to be a few minor fixes to libsigc++. >> I have not yet tried to checkout your work. BTW,

OS/2 compile

2000-02-01 Thread Shigeru Miyata
Sorry for not building LyX (and reporting the result) for such a long time. Here are the list of show stoppers here: In src/support/lyxlib.h mkdir() is prototyped as int mkdir(char const * pathname, unsigned int mode); while in src/support/mkdir.C it is int mkdir(char const * pathname,

Re: OS/2 compile

2000-02-01 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Shigeru Miyata wrote: [...] Sorry if this is already fixed. src/Makefile.am lists bmtable.c while there is only bmtable.C which cannot be I'm sure JMarc has already fixed this in CVS. P.S. Is there any provision for libsigc++ to support gcc 2.8? gcc-2.8.x should

OS/2 compile

2000-02-01 Thread Shigeru Miyata
Sorry for not building LyX (and reporting the result) for such a long time. Here are the list of show stoppers here: In src/support/lyxlib.h mkdir() is prototyped as int mkdir(char const * pathname, unsigned int mode); while in src/support/mkdir.C it is int mkdir(char const * pathname,

Re: OS/2 compile

2000-02-01 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Shigeru Miyata wrote: [...] > Sorry if this is already fixed. src/Makefile.am lists > bmtable.c while there is only bmtable.C which cannot be I'm sure JMarc has already fixed this in CVS. > P.S. Is there any provision for libsigc++ to support > gcc 2.8? gcc-2.8.x