Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On 2015-10-14, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:26:35AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski >> wrote: ... >> > sorry for the long delay - I started to clean up python scripts to >> > make them compatible

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:26:35AM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > > Hi to all, > > > > sorry for the long delay - I started to clean up python scripts to make them > > compatible with both python 2 and 3 so there are

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

Hi to all, sorry for the long delay - I started to clean up python scripts to make them compatible with both python 2 and 3 so there are no more issues with this. I was stopped by lack of time but will start to look at that again - it is not such a big amount of work. Benjamin On Fri, Nov 21,

Re: Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On Friday 19 December 2014 10:40:00 Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: Hi to all, sorry for the long delay - I started to clean up python scripts to make them compatible with both python 2 and 3 so there are no more issues with this. I was stopped by lack of time but will start to look at that again

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski bpiwo...@lyx.org wrote: Hi to all, sorry for the long delay - I started to clean up python scripts to make them compatible with both python 2 and 3 so there are no more issues with this. I was stopped by lack of time but will start to look

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

Hi to all, sorry for the long delay - I started to clean up python scripts to make them compatible with both python 2 and 3 so there are no more issues with this. I was stopped by lack of time but will start to look at that again - it is not such a big amount of work. Benjamin On Fri, Nov 21,

Re: Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On Friday 19 December 2014 10:40:00 Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > Hi to all, > > sorry for the long delay - I started to clean up python scripts to make > them compatible with both python 2 and 3 so there are no more issues with > this. I was stopped by lack of time but will start to look at that

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > Hi to all, > > sorry for the long delay - I started to clean up python scripts to make them > compatible with both python 2 and 3 so there are no more issues with this. I > was stopped by lack of time but will start

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

Ok, let me be splicit. I use extensively Spyder with python 3 for my work, I use also LyX to write my articles. When I installed LyX (on windows) it uses its own bundled python2 and it works fine. The problem arises when I want to import my python graphics into LyX, which should be interpreted

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On 11/21/2014 08:25 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Ok, let me be splicit. I use extensively Spyder with python 3 for my work, I use also LyX to write my articles. When I installed LyX (on windows) it uses its own bundled python2 and it works fine. The problem arises when I want to import my python

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

Am Freitag, 21. November 2014 um 08:55:25, schrieb Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org On 11/21/2014 08:25 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Ok, let me be splicit. I use extensively Spyder with python 3 for my work, I use also LyX to write my articles. When I installed LyX (on windows) it uses its own

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On 11/21/2014 09:23 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Freitag, 21. November 2014 um 08:55:25, schrieb Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org On 11/21/2014 08:25 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Ok, let me be splicit. I use extensively Spyder with python 3 for my work, I use also LyX to write my articles. When I

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

Richard Heck wrote: It might be possible to specify the full path to the python version you want to use in the relevant converter definition. But I am not sure. This is possible. The magic happens only for python -tt. Even specifying only python3 or python3 -tt as the interpreter for self

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

Ok, let me be splicit. I use extensively Spyder with python 3 for my work, I use also LyX to write my articles. When I installed LyX (on windows) it uses its own bundled python2 and it works fine. The problem arises when I want to import my python graphics into LyX, which should be interpreted

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On 11/21/2014 08:25 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Ok, let me be splicit. I use extensively Spyder with python 3 for my work, I use also LyX to write my articles. When I installed LyX (on windows) it uses its own bundled python2 and it works fine. The problem arises when I want to import my python

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

Am Freitag, 21. November 2014 um 08:55:25, schrieb Richard Heck > On 11/21/2014 08:25 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: > > Ok, let me be splicit. I use extensively Spyder with python 3 for my > > work, I use also LyX to write my articles. When I installed LyX (on > > windows) it uses

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On 11/21/2014 09:23 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Freitag, 21. November 2014 um 08:55:25, schrieb Richard Heck On 11/21/2014 08:25 AM, Alex Vergara Gil wrote: Ok, let me be splicit. I use extensively Spyder with python 3 for my work, I use also LyX to write my articles. When I

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

Richard Heck wrote: > It might be possible to specify the full path to the python version you > want to use in > the relevant converter definition. But I am not sure. This is possible. The magic happens only for "python -tt". Even specifying only "python3" or "python3 -tt" as the interpreter

Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

I cleaned RELEASE-NOTES for the master branch. This note is still relevant right? - LyX needs to be run under Python 2 and will not work properly on systems where Python 3 is the default binary. See bug #7030 to know how to fix this properly, since simple sheebang conversion in *.py files

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: I cleaned RELEASE-NOTES for the master branch. This note is still relevant right? - LyX needs to be run under Python 2 and will not work properly on systems where Python 3 is the default binary. See bug #7030 to know

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

The incompatibilities still exist at least in Windows sistems, since LyX installer bundles a python distribution itself and creates a conflict when python3 is the default. Moreover you cannot use python3 within LyX in Windows, because you will beak the system, LyX will not reconfigure anymore!!

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On 11/20/2014 09:55 AM, stefano franchi wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org mailto:skost...@lyx.org wrote: I cleaned RELEASE-NOTES for the master branch. This note is still relevant right? - LyX needs to be run under Python 2 and will not work

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: On 11/20/2014 09:55 AM, stefano franchi wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote: I cleaned RELEASE-NOTES for the master branch. This note is still relevant right? - LyX needs to be

Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

I cleaned RELEASE-NOTES for the master branch. This note is still relevant right? - LyX needs to be run under Python 2 and will not work properly on systems where Python 3 is the default binary. See bug #7030 to know how to fix this properly, since simple sheebang conversion in *.py files

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I cleaned RELEASE-NOTES for the master branch. This note is still > relevant right? > > - LyX needs to be run under Python 2 and will not work properly on systems > where Python 3 is the default binary. See bug #7030

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

The incompatibilities still exist at least in Windows sistems, since LyX installer bundles a python distribution itself and creates a conflict when python3 is the default. Moreover you cannot use python3 within LyX in Windows, because you will beak the system, LyX will not reconfigure anymore!!

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On 11/20/2014 09:55 AM, stefano franchi wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Scott Kostyshak > wrote: I cleaned RELEASE-NOTES for the master branch. This note is still relevant right? - LyX needs to be run under Python 2 and will not

Re: Python 3 incompatibilities still exist right?

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > On 11/20/2014 09:55 AM, stefano franchi wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> I cleaned RELEASE-NOTES for the master branch. This note is still >> relevant right? >> >> -