Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Luis Rivera wrote:
> > I think this is the wrong approach, if there is some way to implement
> > script/macro running right from inside LyX.
> >
> > If Bo Peng is right, he can try turning all shell scripts into python;
> > and if the developers embe
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Bo,
>
> >> > I found that I could convert all the python script to .exe.
> >> > Thus I can remove Pyhthon dependecy.
> >>
> >> Are you sure?
>
> > Also, there are some dynamically generated sh scripts that might be
> > translated to dynamically generated pytho
Luis Rivera wrote:
> I think this is the wrong approach, if there is some way to implement
> script/macro running right from inside LyX.
>
> If Bo Peng is right, he can try turning all shell scripts into python;
> and if the developers embed python within LyX, you don't need to call
> python.exe,
Dear Jean-Marc,
Bo>> convert.exe and aspell.exe should be easy to handle,
> be a static version also. Concerning aspell, the main problem will be
> the dictionaries.
I agree, spellchecking is hard to install It was hard for me to install
aspell, it took few mounth to get it working. It was hard to
Dear Bo,
> Please send the detailed instructions on how to do this to the list.
Ok. Here comes, the detailed how to use it guide.
First we need some general build.bat (or build.cmd) file for running the
packaging:
$ python setup.py py2exe
After running the command script, the package generated
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dears,
>
> I found that I could convert all the python script to .exe.
> Thus I can remove Pyhthon dependecy.
> In case I know well, there are some python script left in the script
> directory.
> I could relocate lyx2lyx here, and convert other scripts to .exe.
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> convert.exe and aspell.exe should be easy to handle,
Well, it seems that convert.exe uses a lot of libraries, but there may
be a static version also. Concerning aspell, the main problem will be
the dictionaries.
Bo> and packing miktex is not
> What will happen if I try to send an attachment to the mailing list?
> Is it allowed?
>
Please send the detailed instructions on how to do this to the list.
After we get rid of perl and mingw and have python scripts compiled
like this, we will be much closer to an everything-included lyx
distrib
Dear Mike,
>> > The downside is that you wind up with one copy of Python installed for
>> > every script. If you've only got one script, this is ok. If you've got
>> > more than one, you probably want to consider another approach.
>> It will be the same, using several scripts, too.
>>
>> I have
Dear Bo,
>> > I found that I could convert all the python script to .exe.
>> > Thus I can remove Pyhthon dependecy.
>>
>> Are you sure?
> Also, there are some dynamically generated sh scripts that might be
> translated to dynamically generated python script later so an
> interpreter is needed.
I
> > I found that I could convert all the python script to .exe.
> > Thus I can remove Pyhthon dependecy.
>
> Are you sure?
Also, there are some dynamically generated sh scripts that might be
translated to dynamically generated python script later so an
interpreter is needed.
Bo
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> > The downside is that you wind up with one copy of Python installed for
> > every script. If you've only got one script, this is ok. If you've got
> > more than one, you probably want to consider another approach.
> It will be the same, using seve
Dear Mike,
> Are you sure? The only way I know of to convert a python script to
> .exe is with py2exe, which does it by creating an executable archive,
> and putting all the scripts that make up the program and the python
> interpreter in the archive. It doesn't remove the Python dependency so
> m
Dear Mike,
> Are you sure? The only way I know of to convert a python script to
> .exe is with py2exe, which does it by creating an executable archive,
> and putting all the scripts that make up the program and the python
> interpreter in the archive. It doesn't remove the Python dependency so
> m
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> Dears,
>
> I found that I could convert all the python script to .exe.
> Thus I can remove Pyhthon dependecy.
Are you sure? The only way I know of to convert a python script to
.exe is with py2exe, which does it by creating an executable archive,
Dears,
I found that I could convert all the python script to .exe.
Thus I can remove Pyhthon dependecy.
In case I know well, there are some python script left in the script directory.
I could relocate lyx2lyx here, and convert other scripts to .exe. Thus all
the converted scripts will reside in th
16 matches
Mail list logo
