Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, John Levon wrote:
>>
>>> 4. Document .layout wizard
>>
> | It would be really nice, if you didn't have to restart LyX every
> | time you change or add a .layout...
>>
> | Or how about not hav
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 12:27:11AM +0200, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, John Levon wrote:
>
> > 4. Document .layout wizard
>
> It would be really nice, if you didn't have to restart LyX every time you
> change or add a .layout...
Or having a .layout as part of the .lyx.
Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, John Levon wrote:
>
>> 4. Document .layout wizard
>
| It would be really nice, if you didn't have to restart LyX every time you
| change or add a .layout...
>
| Or how about not having to restart LyX after doing a re-config
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003, John Levon wrote:
> 4. Document .layout wizard
It would be really nice, if you didn't have to restart LyX every time you
change or add a .layout...
Or how about not having to restart LyX after doing a re-configuration...
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:31:13PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> How about multiple windows/views ?
This is well below rank 10 on _my_ imaginary list implementation-wise,
but's a nice-to-have as concept...
Andre'
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:31:13PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> How about multiple windows/views ?
Sure, if somebody does a top twenty ...
The others are all more important IMHO, I even have arguments for them
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, th
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> How about multiple windows/views ?
Things seem to be slowly evolving towards that too. The frontend code
is pretty well there, as indeed is the code in all the src
subdirectories. Only the code in src itself stands in the way, but
the current core clean-up is looking very pr
On Thursday 16 October 2003 15:35, John Levon wrote:
> > BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
>
> Let's see if somebody can guess :) It's not hard ...
I am dumb, what else? :-)
Thanks to André for elucidating me. :-)
> john
--
José Abílio
LyX and docbook, a perfect match. :-)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:22:07PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>
> Here's the full top ten (that I just made up).
>
> 1. Character styles
> 2. Unicode support
> 3. Outliner
> 4. Document .layout wizard
> 5. Decent support for including code (including GUI labels + xrefs etc.)
> 6. Context menus and
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:04:43PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Any documents in a different encoding won't be in ASCII though :)
>
> | But Jos?© said it was easy to handle, so...
>
> Hmm... but he has to read most of the lyx file header to find out what
> language is it written in and w
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 05:24:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> So you just waited for a decent answer and decided to build your list
> around that?
Nah, not quite, 1. and 2. have been brewing in my mind for a while
now.
> Any of these not mentioned int he list on lyx.devel?
Nope, it's
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:42:45PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> character styles?
>
| You win ! With honorable mention to André for getting the underlyig
| motivation correct.
>
| Here's the full top ten (that I just made up).
So you just waited for a
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:42:45PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> character styles?
You win ! With honorable mention to André for getting the underlyig
motivation correct.
Here's the full top ten (that I just made up).
1. Character styles
2. Unicode support
3. Outliner
4. Document .layout wizar
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:38:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> Your list?
>>
>> qt support
>
| Don't we already have that :)
I thought you crossed that one out, and am are now finished with your
tasks :-)
--
Lgb
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 04:38:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Your list?
>
> qt support
Don't we already have that :)
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
John Levon wrote:
>> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
> Let's see if somebody can guess :) It's not hard ...
Let's start the ball rolling then...
character styles?
--
Angus
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:27:00PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
>
>> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
>
| Let's see if somebody can guess :) It's not hard ...
Your list?
qt support
--
Lgb
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:27:00PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
Let's see if somebody can guess :) It's not hard ...
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:27:00PM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote:
> BTW, what is #1 in the must-have list?
World domination?
Andre'
On Thursday 16 October 2003 15:04, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | Any documents in a different encoding won't be in ASCII though :)
> |
> | But José said it was easy to handle, so...
>
> Hmm... but he has to read most of the lyx file header to find out what
> language is it written in and whet
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> I was hoping that we would be able to do this for 1.4, but I think we
>> should wait for 1.5. Reading and writing utf-8 is the what we should
>> do first imho, especially since standa
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> I was hoping that we would be able to do this for 1.4, but I think we
> should wait for 1.5. Reading and writing utf-8 is the what we should
> do first imho, especially since standard ASCII is utf-8 good as any.
Any documents
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:36:36PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:26:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> >> A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
> >
> | What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
>
> Me. W
On Thursday 16 October 2003 14:41, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
> >
> > What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
>
> This is probably incomplete.
[...]
> o lyx2lyx support for snooping
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| o the ability to read in and write out UTF-8 encoded .lyx files
I was hoping that we would be able to do this for 1.4, but I think we
should wait for 1.5. Reading and writing utf-8 is the what we should
do first imho, especially since standard ASCII is utf
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
>
> What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
This is probably incomplete.
o moving chartype to the agreed upon (I think ?) 32-bit value
o deciding whether wstring is really
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:26:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
>
| What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
Me. We are not doing that now. Let's wait for 1.5 with that.
--
Lgb
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:26:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> A unicoded lyx would solve the latter nicely.
What prevents us currently from going to unicode?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferso
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:55:03PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Were it to work as you suggest, would it also enable russians to type
> latin or greek also? That's the same problem isn't it?
Nope ! There are three things related to this :
1) entering the character. X has locale-specific compos
John Levon wrote:
>> > "Fix exact match for raw mode fonts."
>> >
>> > This may relate to the problem of using latex-xft-fonts in
>> > locales such
>> > as ru_RU.UTF-8. Testers needed ... I forget if we still try a
>> > rawMode load or not...
>>
>> Could you expand a little for the non-initiated
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > "Fix exact match for raw mode fonts."
> >
> > This may relate to the problem of using latex-xft-fonts in locales
> > such
> > as ru_RU.UTF-8. Testers needed ... I forget if we still try a
> > rawMode load or not...
>
> Could you
John Levon wrote:
>
> From the changes :
>
> "Fix exact match for raw mode fonts."
>
> This may relate to the problem of using latex-xft-fonts in locales
> such
> as ru_RU.UTF-8. Testers needed ... I forget if we still try a
> rawMode load or not...
Could you expand a little for the non-initi
>From the changes :
"Fix exact match for raw mode fonts."
This may relate to the problem of using latex-xft-fonts in locales such
as ru_RU.UTF-8. Testers needed ... I forget if we still try a rawMode
load or not...
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, th
33 matches
Mail list logo
