On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 12:43 +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
maybe we should disallow a space after a backslash in math?
or are there situations where this makes sense?
I was using it for a while before I was told about the siunits package.
I still use it sometimes. Please don't forbid that :)
I
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 12:43 +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> maybe we should disallow a space after a backslash in math?
>
> or are there situations where this makes sense?
I was using it for a while before I was told about the siunits package.
I still use it sometimes. Please don't forbid that :)
I
Edwin == Leuven, E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Edwin Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It is completely different: dEPM disallows things that have _no_
meaning to LaTeX (like double space). And empty math inset is
acceptable, even if it is most of the times not wanted.
Edwin sure, perhaps latex
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Edwin sure, perhaps latex permits this but when would you want to
Edwin create an empty math inset?
There are always people who have good reasons to do weird things.
Which should not artificially forbid constructs.
we wouldn't, there is ert
...
signing off on
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:25:16PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
I toss M$ Word because, among other overly clever features, it changes
i to I all the time.
(before we used the big nasty wolf to scare people, now it is the big nasty
M$)
I would object, in general, any *automatic*
> "Edwin" == Leuven, E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Edwin> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> It is completely different: dEPM disallows things that have _no_
>> meaning to LaTeX (like double space). And empty math inset is
>> acceptable, even if it is most of the times not wanted.
Edwin> sure,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Edwin> sure, perhaps latex permits this but when would you want to
Edwin> create an empty math inset?
There are always people who have good reasons to do weird things.
Which should not artificially forbid constructs.
we wouldn't, there is ert
...
signing off on
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 06:25:16PM +0200, Leuven, E. wrote:
> > I toss M$ Word because, among other overly clever features, it changes
> > i to I all the time.
>
> (before we used the big nasty wolf to scare people, now it is the big nasty
> M$)
>
> > I would object, in general, any
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It is completely different: dEPM disallows things that have _no_
meaning to LaTeX (like double space). And empty math inset is
acceptable, even if it is most of the times not wanted.
sure, perhaps latex permits this but when would you want to create an empty
math
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It is completely different: dEPM disallows things that have _no_
> meaning to LaTeX (like double space). And empty math inset is
> acceptable, even if it is most of the times not wanted.
sure, perhaps latex permits this but when would you want to create an empty
Leuven, E. wrote:
I toss M$ Word because, among other overly clever features, it changes
i to I all the time.
(before we used the big nasty wolf to scare people, now it is the big
nasty M$)
I would object, in general, any *automatic*
changes to what I entered without my agreement.
I
Edwin == Leuven, E [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I toss M$ Word because, among other overly clever features, it
changes i to I all the time.
Edwin (before we used the big nasty wolf to scare people, now it is
Edwin the big nasty M$)
I would object, in general, any *automatic* changes to what
Leuven, E. wrote:
>> I toss M$ Word because, among other overly clever features, it changes
>> i to I all the time.
>
> (before we used the big nasty wolf to scare people, now it is the big
> nasty M$)
>
>> I would object, in general, any *automatic*
>> changes to what I entered without my
> "Edwin" == Leuven, E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I toss M$ Word because, among other overly clever features, it
>> changes i to I all the time.
Edwin> (before we used the big nasty wolf to scare people, now it is
Edwin> the big nasty M$)
>> I would object, in general, any *automatic*
14 matches
Mail list logo
