Re: Transition vs 1.1.x (was: support for modern istream in cvs

2000-01-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | A find reveals that there exists a /usr/include/linuxconf/sstream.h | is that of any matter? No, it is a bug/missing feaute in egcs that made this happen. when using std::stringstream; egcs requiers stringstream to be in scope...soemhow. This is fixed

Re: Transition vs 1.1.x (was: support for modern istream in cvs

2000-01-10 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 07-Jan-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It seems that you have a header problem, have you done experiments > with stlport? > No not at all! > stringstream should only be used if you have the sstream hader, > otherwise the strstream should be u

Re: Transition vs 1.1.x (was: support for modern istream in cvs

2000-01-07 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 08:15:40PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | In file included from ../../src/layout.h:21, > | from ../../src/lyxparagraph.h:23, > | from ../../src/undo.h:19, > | from ../../src/buffer.h:29, > | from ../

Re: Transition vs 1.1.x (was: support for modern istream in cvs

2000-01-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > On 7 Jan 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | >> I have put code that I think should make it possible to use lyx with | >> modern istream, but I have also experienced dataloss when trying this | >> outl Note that I have used a C++ lib in alpha state whe

Re: Transition vs 1.1.x (was: support for modern istream in cvs)

2000-01-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> I'm glad I write really long emails. It gives me a chance to Allan> calm down as I get further into the document. I haven't cut or Allan> reworded any of my early comments because I still believe they Allan> need to be said. ;) Allan

RE: Transition vs 1.1.x (was: support for modern istream in cvs

2000-01-07 Thread Juergen Vigna
> On 7 Jan 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> I have put code that I think should make it possible to use lyx with >> modern istream, but I have also experienced dataloss when trying this >> outl Note that I have used a C++ lib in alpha state when doing this, >> so it might be perfect as it is, b