Re: Question on Multiple Render Passes

On 12/01/2022 06:44, Joel Kulesza wrote: LyX Developers, A colleague asked me a question the other day on how LyX operates that I was unsure of, which I hope you can help me with.  He'd read that an approach to "speeding up" multiple render-pass LaTeX compilations is to use draft-mode

Re: Question about trac search

On 1/4/21 4:47 AM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am Mo., 4. Jan. 2021 um 10:39 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin >: > > I am trying to search for bugs in Trac. I have chosen only "new" > status in the filters, but the result also shows fixedinstable, > reopened and even closed bugs in some

Re: Question about trac search

Am Mo., 4. Jan. 2021 um 10:39 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > I am trying to search for bugs in Trac. I have chosen only "new" status in > the filters, but the result also shows fixedinstable, reopened and even > closed bugs in some cases. See attached. > What am I doing wrong? > Ah found, it was (status

Re: Question on undo: Remove a finishUndo() after a recordUndo() ?

On Sat, Feb 01, 2020 at 08:41:12PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 01/02/2020 à 18:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > What would the consequences be of the attached patch? > > > > From what I understand, finishUndo() is meant for when there have been > > som undos of type INSERT or DELETE

Re: Question on undo: Remove a finishUndo() after a recordUndo() ?

Le 01/02/2020 à 18:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : What would the consequences be of the attached patch? From what I understand, finishUndo() is meant for when there have been som undos of type INSERT or DELETE recorded, but PARAGRAPH_MOVE_DOWN itself does not record any INSERTs or DELETEs. What

Re: Question on osuosl.org hosting service(s)

Thanks, Pavel, to taking this responsiblity. On 09/06/2018 10:37 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Hi OSU Open Source Lab, > > I'm one of developers of LyX, open source document processor (www.lyx.org). > Our services (web/bug tracker system/git server/wiki site) used to be kindly > hosted for the past

Re: Question for Guillaume about b30f8d3c and GuiFontMetrics::countExpanders

Le 27/07/2017 à 16:11, Guillaume MM a écrit : The reasoning was that how many expanders there are in a string is toolkit-specific. This implementation was by testing and reading the docs and source code of Qt, and does not correspond to my knowledge to any Unicode standard (say). So, using the

Re: Question for Guillaume about b30f8d3c and GuiFontMetrics::countExpanders

Le 25/07/2017 à 14:36, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Hi Guillaume, The commit log for b30f8d3c says: " CountExpanders() is moved to FontMetrics to fix a discrepancy with the duplicate implementation from 598f7e4a." I interpret that to mean that countExpanders() should be available in

Re: Question on installation of Lyx from distro and/or over internet

On 07/14/2016 11:56 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: Le 14/07/2016 07:13, Buenas Noticias a écrit : Hi Michael: TeXlive can work because each is in a different folder and you are the one you decide on your route which you work (/usr/local/texlive/2013 or 2016). I think that if you have

Re: Question on installation of Lyx from distro and/or over internet

Le 14/07/2016 07:13, Buenas Noticias a écrit : Hi Michael: TeXlive can work because each is in a different folder and you are the one you decide on your route which you work (/usr/local/texlive/2013 or 2016). I think that if you have installed an earlier version of lyx and install later, the

Re: Question on installation of Lyx from distro and/or over internet

Hi Michael: TeXlive can work because each is in a different folder and you are the one you decide on your route which you work (/usr/local/texlive/2013 or 2016). I think that if you have installed an earlier version of lyx and install later, the lyx executable will be overwritten and the

Re: Question for Richard

Le 15/04/15 18:20, Richard Heck a écrit : -docstring const TextClass::emptylayout_ = from_ascii(N_(Plain Layout)); +// This string cannot be translated, because it is a layout identifier. +docstring const TextClass::emptylayout_ = from_ascii(Plain Layout); If you look at TextClass.cpp from

Re: Question for Richard

Le 15/04/15 18:20, Richard Heck a écrit : -docstring const TextClass::emptylayout_ = from_ascii(N_("Plain Layout")); +// This string cannot be translated, because it is a layout identifier. +docstring const TextClass::emptylayout_ = from_ascii("Plain Layout"); If you look at TextClass.cpp from

Re: Question for Richard

On 04/15/2015 05:57 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Hi Richard, I have a question about an old commit (see bleow). Basically, what you do here causes the message machinery to be invoked before the locale is properly set up. It is not a big problem per se, but the patch looks very dubious to

Re: Question for Richard

On 04/15/2015 05:57 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Hi Richard, I have a question about an old commit (see bleow). Basically, what you do here causes the message machinery to be invoked before the locale is properly set up. It is not a big problem per se, but the patch looks very dubious to

Re: Question about Translations for 2.1.3

Richard Heck wrote: Can anyone explain to me exactly I need to do to incorporate new po files into 2.1.x? Uwe usually does this, but it appears he is busy right now. The last time I did it, I messed something up. I think it had to do with not regenerating gmo files, but I'm not sure. IIRC

Re: Question about Translations for 2.1.3

Richard Heck wrote: > Can anyone explain to me exactly I need to do to incorporate new po > files into 2.1.x? Uwe usually does this, but it appears he is busy right > now. The last time I did it, I messed something up. I think it had to do > with not regenerating gmo files, but I'm not sure. IIRC

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am 25.08.2014 um 15:53 schrieb Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net: Since Qt5 the Qt developers decided to not define the Q_WS_ macros anymore. The reasoning is to disable all platform specific code and force the Qt users like us to review all code guarded by Q_WS_ macros. This means all code in LyX

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 16:08:27, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 15:53:14, schrieb Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net Since Qt5 the Qt developers decided to not define the Q_WS_ macros anymore. The reasoning is to disable all platform specific code and force

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 15:53:14, schrieb Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net Since Qt5 the Qt developers decided to not define the Q_WS_ macros anymore. The reasoning is to disable all platform specific code and force the Qt users like us to review all code guarded by Q_WS_ macros. This means

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am 25.08.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org: Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 16:08:27, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 15:53:14, schrieb Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net Since Qt5 the Qt developers decided to not define the Q_WS_ macros anymore.

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:18:02PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 25.08.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org: Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 16:08:27, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org At least on QT4 there is no symbol Q_OS_X11. So this patch would break QT4

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am 25.08.2014 um 17:54 schrieb Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:18:02PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 25.08.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org: Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 16:08:27, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org At least on QT4 there

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:54:08PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:18:02PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 25.08.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org: Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 16:08:27, schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org At least on

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am 25.08.2014 um 19:58 schrieb Enrico Forestieri for...@lyx.org: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:54:08PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:18:02PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: Am 25.08.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Kornel Benko kor...@lyx.org: Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am 25.08.2014 um 15:53 schrieb Stephan Witt : > Since Qt5 the Qt developers decided to not define the Q_WS_ macros anymore. > The reasoning is to disable all platform specific code and force the Qt users > like us to review all code guarded by Q_WS_ macros. This means all code in

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 16:08:27, schrieb Kornel Benko > Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 15:53:14, schrieb Stephan Witt > > Since Qt5 the Qt developers decided to not define the Q_WS_ macros anymore. > > The reasoning is to disable all platform specific code

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 15:53:14, schrieb Stephan Witt > Since Qt5 the Qt developers decided to not define the Q_WS_ macros anymore. > The reasoning is to disable all platform specific code and force the Qt users > like us to review all code guarded by Q_WS_ macros. This

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am 25.08.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 16:08:27, schrieb Kornel Benko >> Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 15:53:14, schrieb Stephan Witt >> >>> Since Qt5 the Qt developers decided to not define the Q_WS_

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:18:02PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > > Am 25.08.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 16:08:27, schrieb Kornel Benko > > > >> At least on QT4 there is no symbol Q_OS_X11. So this patch would break

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am 25.08.2014 um 17:54 schrieb Enrico Forestieri : > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:18:02PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > >> >> Am 25.08.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Kornel Benko : >> >>> Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 16:08:27, schrieb Kornel Benko >>>

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:54:08PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:18:02PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > > > > > Am 25.08.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > Am Montag, 25. August 2014 um 16:08:27, schrieb Kornel Benko > > >

Re: QUESTION: How to enable Qt5 for LyX master

Am 25.08.2014 um 19:58 schrieb Enrico Forestieri : > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:54:08PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 04:18:02PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: >> >>> >>> Am 25.08.2014 um 16:12 schrieb Kornel Benko : >>> Am

Re: Question about project organzation

On 04/16/2014 01:40 AM, Min Ding@ANU wrote: Hi, I have some questions about our project organzation and structure. I'm not sure who we is here, but * Do we have project team leader? Not in any official sense, I do not think. There's a kind of informal hierarchy, largely based upon

Re: Question about project organzation

On 04/16/2014 01:40 AM, Min Ding@ANU wrote: Hi, I have some questions about our project organzation and structure. I'm not sure who "we" is here, but * Do we have project team leader? Not in any official sense, I do not think. There's a kind of informal hierarchy, largely based

Re: Question, small TYPO

On 05/22/2013 04:19 PM, Gordon Watson wrote: 1. Question: No names on the SUPPORTERS list? Any significance in that? I'm not sure what is supposed to be there. 2. Small typo Contributors list: http://www.lyx.org/Credits#toc1 Carmen Kauffmann Original name that is now two characterS shorter

Re: Question, small TYPO

On 05/22/2013 04:19 PM, Gordon Watson wrote: 1. Question: No names on the SUPPORTERS list? Any significance in that? I'm not sure what is supposed to be there. 2. Small typo Contributors list: http://www.lyx.org/Credits#toc1 "Carmen Kauffmann Original name that is now two characterS

Re: Question about Advanced Find and Replace project

On 30/04/13 20:28, Ayrat Khalitov wrote: Hello! Hi, I update my proposal and I have three questions about Advanced Find and Replace module: 1) Which are most important problems in this module available? Describe them in more detail, please (slowness, non-working corner cases... ) . The

Re: Question about Advanced Find and Replace project

On 30/04/13 20:28, Ayrat Khalitov wrote: > Hello! Hi, > I update my proposal and I have three questions about Advanced Find and > Replace module: > 1) Which are most important problems in this module available? Describe them > in more detail, please (slowness, non-working corner cases... ) .

Re: Question about tex2lyx Parser::deparse()

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 26/02/2013 22:23, Georg Baum a écrit : Jean-Marc, many thanks for your noweb improvements! While investigating how your test document could be added to the test suite I stumbled over some encoding warnings that are currently output for CJK.tex. I added this

Re: Question about tex2lyx Parser::deparse()

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 26/02/2013 22:23, Georg Baum a écrit : >> Jean-Marc, >> >> many thanks for your noweb improvements! While investigating how your >> test document could be added to the test suite I stumbled over some >> encoding warnings that are currently output for CJK.tex. I

Re: Question about tex2lyx Parser::deparse()

Le 26/02/2013 22:23, Georg Baum a écrit : Jean-Marc, many thanks for your noweb improvements! While investigating how your test document could be added to the test suite I stumbled over some encoding warnings that are currently output for CJK.tex. I added this warning (in

Re: Question about tex2lyx Parser::deparse()

Le 26/02/2013 22:23, Georg Baum a écrit : Jean-Marc, many thanks for your noweb improvements! While investigating how your test document could be added to the test suite I stumbled over some encoding warnings that are currently output for CJK.tex. I added this warning (in

Re: question about Inset-Info

Le 04/01/2012 08:36, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : BTW the drawback of your approach might be that some binding files (at least aqua.bind, AFAICS) do not use the command-alternatives and will thus not display the shortcut. We could specialize the inset-info code for the case of

Re: question about Inset-Info

Le 04/01/2012 08:36, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : BTW the drawback of your approach might be that some binding files (at least aqua.bind, AFAICS) do not use the command-alternatives and will thus not display the shortcut. We could specialize the inset-info code for the case of

Re: question about Inset-Info

Uwe Stöhr wrote: I want to reference in the UserGuide the shortcut for a protected space Ctrl+Space. Its definition is command-alternatives space-insert protected But when I use this in an Inset-Info I get an empty shortcut. What can I do or is this a bug? if you enter the whole

Re: question about Inset-Info

Am 03.01.2012 09:04, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: if you enter the whole command-alternatives space-insert protected ; math-space it works. Thanks! That was was I needed. I suppose in your case, you do not get an empty shortcut, but a nobreakspace character, since this is what space-insert

Re: question about Inset-Info

Uwe Stöhr wrote: I think it is not a good idea to visualize nobreakspace that way. I want to print the shortcut Ctrl+Space , not \textvisiblespace. And this works now. I was referring to how LyX visualizes nobreakspace. I think this should be changed to something more informative. BTW the

Re: question about Inset-Info

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > I want to reference in the UserGuide the shortcut for a protected space > "Ctrl+Space". Its definition is > > command-alternatives space-insert protected > > But when I use this in an Inset-Info I get an empty shortcut. What can I do > or is this a bug? if you enter the whole

Re: question about Inset-Info

Am 03.01.2012 09:04, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: if you enter the whole command-alternatives space-insert protected ; math-space it works. Thanks! That was was I needed. I suppose in your case, you do not get an empty shortcut, but a nobreakspace character, since this is what

Re: question about Inset-Info

Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> I think it is not a good idea to visualize nobreakspace that way. > > I want to print the shortcut "Ctrl+Space" , not \textvisiblespace. And this > works now. I was referring to how LyX visualizes nobreakspace. I think this should be changed to something more informative.

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: Am 01.11.2011 23:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Set the lyxpipe I cannot set it. In the UserGuide, sec. C.3 Paths, Hartmut wrote an example for me. I have JabRef installed and could test it, but don't know what to

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 01.11.2011 23:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> Set the lyxpipe > > I cannot set it. In the UserGuide, sec. C.3 Paths, Hartmut wrote an example > for me. I have JabRef installed and could test it, but don't know what

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Op 1-11-2011 1:54, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 31.10.2011 04:02, schrieb PhilipPirrip: Tools Preferences Look Feel User Interface second from below Single instance checkbox Thanks! I have overseen it as it is permanently greyed out. But clear, lyxpipe doesn't work on Windows. I will update

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Am 01.11.2011 08:54, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: lyxpipe also works on Windows: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg154614.html Not for me, but perhaps another problem with my SCons build - definitively time to switch to CMake. But do you have a quick recipe to test

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Set the lyxpipe Check single instance Restart lyx Doubleclick lyx file ... it should open in the already open lyx instance. Vincent Op 1 nov. 2011 19:57 schreef Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de het volgende: Am 01.11.2011 08:54, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: lyxpipe also works on Windows:

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Am 01.11.2011 23:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Set the lyxpipe I cannot set it. In the UserGuide, sec. C.3 Paths, Hartmut wrote an example for me. I have JabRef installed and could test it, but don't know what to insert in the LyX Server-pipe field. Check single instance This

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Op 2 nov. 2011 00:01 schreef Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de het volgende: Am 01.11.2011 23:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Set the lyxpipe I cannot set it. In the UserGuide, sec. C.3 Paths, Hartmut wrote an example for me. I have JabRef installed and could test it, but don't know what to

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Op 1-11-2011 1:54, Uwe Stöhr schreef: Am 31.10.2011 04:02, schrieb PhilipPirrip: Tools > Preferences > Look & Feel > User Interface > second from below "Single instance" checkbox Thanks! I have overseen it as it is permanently greyed out. But clear, lyxpipe doesn't work on Windows. I will

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Am 01.11.2011 08:54, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: lyxpipe also works on Windows: http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg154614.html Not for me, but perhaps another problem with my SCons build -> definitively time to switch to CMake. But do you have a quick recipe to test

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Set the lyxpipe Check single instance Restart lyx Doubleclick lyx file ... it should open in the already open lyx instance. Vincent Op 1 nov. 2011 19:57 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" het volgende: > Am 01.11.2011 08:54, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > > lyxpipe also works on Windows:

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Am 01.11.2011 23:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Set the lyxpipe I cannot set it. In the UserGuide, sec. C.3 Paths, Hartmut wrote an example for me. I have JabRef installed and could test it, but don't know what to insert in the LyX Server-pipe field. Check single instance This

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Op 2 nov. 2011 00:01 schreef "Uwe Stöhr" het volgende: > > Am 01.11.2011 23:53, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: > >> Set the lyxpipe > > > I cannot set it. In the UserGuide, sec. C.3 Paths, Hartmut wrote an example for me. I have JabRef installed and could test it, but don't

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Am 31.10.2011 04:02, schrieb PhilipPirrip: Tools Preferences Look Feel User Interface second from below Single instance checkbox Thanks! I have overseen it as it is permanently greyed out. But clear, lyxpipe doesn't work on Windows. I will update the UserGuide accordingly now.

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

Am 31.10.2011 04:02, schrieb PhilipPirrip: Tools > Preferences > Look & Feel > User Interface > second from below "Single instance" checkbox Thanks! I have overseen it as it is permanently greyed out. But clear, lyxpipe doesn't work on Windows. I will update the UserGuide accordingly now.

Re: question about roff command in LyX's preferences

Op 30-10-2011 4:09, Uwe Stöhr schreef: In LyX 1.6.x we had in the preferences under Output-Plain text a field for the roff command. Where is this gone in LyX 2.0? I cannot find anything about it in the preferences and also not in the document settings. The description of this feature was:

Re: question about roff command in LyX's preferences

Am 30.10.2011 23:08, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Can anybody please point me to it? http://www.lyx.org/trac/search?q=roffnoquickjump=1changeset=on Thank you! regards Uwe

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

On 10/31/2011 03:15 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: But I cannot find a checkbox named Single instance. Can you please point me to it? Tools Preferences Look Feel User Interface second from below Single instance checkbox (at least in my LyX v2.0.1)

Re: question about roff command in LyX's preferences

Op 30-10-2011 4:09, Uwe Stöhr schreef: In LyX 1.6.x we had in the preferences under Output->Plain text a field for the "roff command". Where is this gone in LyX 2.0? I cannot find anything about it in the preferences and also not in the document settings. The description of this feature was:

Re: question about roff command in LyX's preferences

Am 30.10.2011 23:08, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Can anybody please point me to it? http://www.lyx.org/trac/search?q=roff=1=on Thank you! regards Uwe

Re: Question about the new lyxpipe feature

On 10/31/2011 03:15 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: But I cannot find a checkbox named "Single instance". Can you please point me to it? Tools > Preferences > Look & Feel > User Interface > second from below "Single instance" checkbox (at least in my LyX v2.0.1)

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 04:25:26AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 15.10.2011 23:46, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: I don't know what grammar errors you are referring to, What is so difficult to have a look at my initial post of this thread. Yes, I saw it, but I still don't know what grammar

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

Am 16.10.2011 11:18, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: What is so difficult to have a look at my initial post of this thread. Yes, I saw it, but I still don't know what grammar errors you are referring to. When replaced by If.

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 04:54:11PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 16.10.2011 11:18, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: What is so difficult to have a look at my initial post of this thread. Yes, I saw it, but I still don't know what grammar errors you are referring to. When replaced by If. And,

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

Am 16.10.2011 19:29, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: When replaced by If. And, according to you, that's the grammar error? Our docs were during the last year kindly reviewed by Mr. Hudson - a lector in a publishing company. He corrected almost all my when to if for the case that when was to

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:55:51PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 16.10.2011 19:29, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: When replaced by If. And, according to you, that's the grammar error? Our docs were during the last year kindly reviewed by Mr. Hudson - a lector in a publishing company. He

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 04:25:26AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 15.10.2011 23:46, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >I don't know what grammar errors you are referring to, > > What is so difficult to have a look at my initial post of this thread. Yes, I saw it, but I still don't know what grammar

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

Am 16.10.2011 11:18, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: What is so difficult to have a look at my initial post of this thread. Yes, I saw it, but I still don't know what grammar errors you are referring to. When replaced by If.

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 04:54:11PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 16.10.2011 11:18, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >>What is so difficult to have a look at my initial post of this thread. > > > >Yes, I saw it, but I still don't know what grammar errors you are > >referring to. > > When replaced

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

Am 16.10.2011 19:29, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: When replaced by If. And, according to you, that's the grammar error? Our docs were during the last year kindly reviewed by Mr. Hudson - a lector in a publishing company. He corrected almost all my when to if for the case that when was to

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:55:51PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 16.10.2011 19:29, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >>When replaced by If. > > > >And, according to you, that's the grammar error? > > Our docs were during the last year kindly reviewed by Mr. Hudson - a > lector in a publishing

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 04:18:39AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a _prefix_? Because TEXINPUTS may already be set in the environment, in which case its content should be

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

Am 15.10.2011 19:31, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a _prefix_? Because TEXINPUTS may already be set in the environment, I must admit that I then did not yet understand

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:13:34PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 15.10.2011 19:31, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a _prefix_? Because TEXINPUTS may already be set in the

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

Am 15.10.2011 22:41, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_variable#Local_to_process So it is only available while LyX is executed (as if I use the command set in a batch file). But then it is no prefix to an existing variable, but the variable itself. That was

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 15.10.2011 22:41, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_variable#Local_to_process So it is only available while LyX is executed (as if I use the command set in a batch file). But then it is no

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

Am 15.10.2011 23:46, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: I'm giving up, but you should try yourself to answer the following question. What happens if TEXINPUTS is already set in the environment when LyX is launched? Then it would be a prefix. But this is not the case except I add this variable

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 04:18:39AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment > variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a > _prefix_? Because TEXINPUTS may already be set in the environment, in which case its content should be

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

Am 15.10.2011 19:31, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a _prefix_? Because TEXINPUTS may already be set in the environment, I must admit that I then did not yet understand

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:13:34PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 15.10.2011 19:31, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >>As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment > >>variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a > >>_prefix_? > > > >Because TEXINPUTS may already

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

Am 15.10.2011 22:41, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_variable#Local_to_process So it is only available while LyX is executed (as if I use the command "set" in a batch file). But then it is no prefix to an existing variable, but the variable itself. That

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 15.10.2011 22:41, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_variable#Local_to_process > > So it is only available while LyX is executed (as if I use the > command "set" in a batch file). But then it

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

Am 15.10.2011 23:46, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: I'm giving up, but you should try yourself to answer the following question. What happens if TEXINPUTS is already set in the environment when LyX is launched? Then it would be a prefix. But this is not the case except I add this variable

Re: question to update to docs

Le 14/10/2011 06:05, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Another question: what does the preferences option Use Mac-style for cursor moving between words do? Is this platform-specific? I cannot see a difference but I never had a Mac. IIRC, the difference is whether your cursor ends up at the end of

Re: question to update to docs

Am 14.10.2011 10:28, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: what does the preferences option Use Mac-style for cursor moving between words do? Is this platform-specific? I cannot see a difference but I never had a Mac. IIRC, the difference is whether your cursor ends up at the end of current word

Re: question to update to docs

Le 14/10/2011 06:05, Uwe Stöhr a écrit : Another question: what does the preferences option Use Mac-style for cursor moving between words do? Is this platform-specific? I cannot see a difference but I never had a Mac. IIRC, the difference is whether your cursor ends up at the end of

Re: question to update to docs

Am 14.10.2011 10:28, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: what does the preferences option Use Mac-style for cursor moving between words do? Is this platform-specific? I cannot see a difference but I never had a Mac. IIRC, the difference is whether your cursor ends up at the end of current word

Re: Question regarding Cursor::normalize()

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: While looking at #7209 I stumbled over Cursor::normalize(). Is it really a good idea to use the cursor inset as math whithout any check to write it to debug output? No. It's not, but it's a relic of the path. Besides, it

Re: Question regarding Cursor::normalize()

Am 06.01.2011 um 10:08 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net wrote: While looking at #7209 I stumbled over Cursor::normalize(). Is it really a good idea to use the cursor inset as math whithout any check to write it to debug output?

Re: Question regarding Cursor::normalize()

Am 06.01.2011 um 10:49 schrieb Stephan Witt: Am 06.01.2011 um 10:08 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn: Second, we should not have a broken cursor. You mean one should call Cursor::fixIfBroken() if a broken cursor is possible? It gets broken after a replace operation of last word in paragraph

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >