Am Montag, 22. August 2016 um 20:02:01, schrieb Guillaume Munch
> Le 20/08/2016 à 15:31, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 02:25:16PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> >> Le 08/08/2016 à 17:40, Richard Heck a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> (We did not do a format change for
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 08:02:01PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 20/08/2016 à 15:31, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 02:25:16PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> > > Le 08/08/2016 à 17:40, Richard Heck a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > (We did not do a format change for that.)
>
Le 20/08/2016 à 15:31, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 02:25:16PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
Le 08/08/2016 à 17:40, Richard Heck a écrit :
(We did not do a format change for that.)
I am worried at the idea of certain commits introducing hidden file
format changes. Is
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 02:25:16PM +0100, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 08/08/2016 à 17:40, Richard Heck a écrit :
> >
> > (We did not do a format change for that.)
>
>
> I am worried at the idea of certain commits introducing hidden file
> format changes. Is there a test somewhere that I could
Le 08/08/2016 à 17:40, Richard Heck a écrit :
(We did not do a format change for that.)
I am worried at the idea of certain commits introducing hidden file
format changes. Is there a test somewhere that I could use, to check
that lyx writes the files identically as it does in earlier stable
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 12:40:29PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> All right, so I ran "make updatetests", and I see a whole ton of errors
> about layouts. But the diff that is produced is presumably all right,
> since there are no branches to do anything with:
From what I understand, this is
All right, so I ran "make updatetests", and I see a whole ton of errors
about layouts. But the diff that is produced is presumably all right,
since there are no branches to do anything with: All I see is the change
of format. Except in one case, where we have:
diff --git
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:29:31PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 08/07/2016 03:24 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 05:57:41AM +0200, Richard Heck wrote:
> >> commit 5df323a0dd564f00c5ab085a3570957ad76b21d3
> >> Author: Richard Heck
> >> Date: Mon Jul 11
On 08/07/2016 03:24 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 05:57:41AM +0200, Richard Heck wrote:
>> commit 5df323a0dd564f00c5ab085a3570957ad76b21d3
>> Author: Richard Heck
>> Date: Mon Jul 11 23:56:32 2016 -0400
>>
>> Introduce "inverted" branch insets: These
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 05:57:41AM +0200, Richard Heck wrote:
> commit 5df323a0dd564f00c5ab085a3570957ad76b21d3
> Author: Richard Heck
> Date: Mon Jul 11 23:56:32 2016 -0400
>
> Introduce "inverted" branch insets: These are branches whose content
> is output when a
10 matches
Mail list logo