Re: [LyX/master] support for all default colors of the package xcolor

Am 15.05.2015 um 05:14 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Is there a reason why White is the only one that is not alphabetized? Note that it was like this before your patch but this just seems a convenient place to bring this up. You are right, there is no reason to treat white differently. I am aware

Re: [LyX/master] support for all default colors of the package xcolor

Am 15.05.2015 um 05:14 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: Is there a reason why "White" is the only one that is not alphabetized? Note that it was like this before your patch but this just seems a convenient place to bring this up. You are right, there is no reason to treat white differently. I am

Re: [LyX/master] support for all default colors of the package xcolor

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org wrote: commit e35bb3126a70384544b315771288db116f894926 Author: Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org Date: Thu May 14 22:23:44 2015 +0200 support for all default colors of the package xcolor fileformat change Is there a reason

Re: [LyX/master] support for all default colors of the package xcolor

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > commit e35bb3126a70384544b315771288db116f894926 > Author: Uwe Stöhr > Date: Thu May 14 22:23:44 2015 +0200 > > support for all default colors of the package xcolor > > fileformat change Is there